Terrence Brown
Utah · 2025–26 · 32 available game logs · Speculative compensation · Model-implied values by season · Linked seasons and observed career performance
Logged performance
1010:44 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 32
- Minutes per game
- 31:35
- Points per game
- 19.9
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 2.4 / 3.8
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 19.9 | 2.4 | 3.8 | 1.4 | 0.1 | 2.4 | 1.6 |
| Per 40 minutes | 25.2 | 3.0 | 4.9 | 1.7 | 0.1 | 3.1 | 2.0 |
| Season totals | 636 | 77 | 123 | 44 | 3 | 78 | 51 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 223–492 | 45.3% | 15.4 | 19.5 |
| 2P | 191–394 | 48.5% | 12.3 | 15.6 |
| 3P | 32–98 | 32.7% | 3.1 | 3.9 |
| FT | 158–204 | 77.5% | 6.4 | 8.1 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 48.6% | 54.7% | 19.9% | 41.5% | 1.58 |
Accepted logged appearances only; absent games are not zeroes. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
Utah · Power 4 · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $610K
- 80% range $280K to $1.10M
- Median share of team pool
- 16.9%
- team pool $3.55M, 80% range $2.55M to $4.95M
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $610K in all four
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $26K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 80.0%
- Sufficient evidence
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. House-settlement $20.5M cap (College Sports Commission, 2026-10-01) times a modelled utilisation of about 97 percent times a men's basketball share of about 18 percent (school statements and an industry study); Power 4 schools are at or near the cap nationally.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
Utah: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ
Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Utah | $610Kspeculative | $280K to $1.10M | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | +0.8 | -0.3 to +1.7 | Sufficient evidence | +1.6 | -0.9 | +4.4range +3.9 to +4.8 | 3,062 | Season detail |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology
Game log
| Measure | Graphic | Last five | Listed games | Range |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minutes | 29:38 | 31:35 | 25:17–37:24 | |
| Points | 18.0 | 19.9 | 6.0–36.0 | |
| Game eFG% | 52.1% | 48.0% | 12.5%–73.3% |
| Date | Opponent | Result | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF | FG | 3P | FT | eFG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-10 | Cincinnati | L 66–73 | 33:41 | 22 | 2 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 7-19 | 0-0 | 8-9 | 36.8% |
| 2026-03-07 | Baylor | L 75–101 | 27:00 | 16 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 7-11 | 0-1 | 2-2 | 63.6% |
| 2026-03-03 | Colorado | L 78–92 | 29:17 | 26 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 10-17 | 1-1 | 5-8 | 61.8% |
| 2026-02-28 | Arizona St. | L 60–73 | 25:17 | 8 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 4-12 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 33.3% |
| 2026-02-24 | Iowa St. | L 59–75 | 32:56 | 18 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 1 | 6-10 | 1-2 | 5-7 | 65.0% |
| 2026-02-21 | UCF | L 71–73 | 29:32 | 21 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 9-15 | 1-3 | 2-2 | 63.3% |
| 2026-02-18 | West Virginia | W 61–56 | 33:37 | 16 | 8 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 6-15 | 0-2 | 4-7 | 40.0% |
| 2026-02-15 | Cincinnati | L 65–69 | 30:36 | 11 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 4-14 | 0-3 | 3-5 | 28.6% |
| 2026-02-10 | Houston | L 52–66 | 30:52 | 12 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 3-8 | 0-2 | 6-8 | 37.5% |
| 2026-02-07 | Kansas | L 59–71 | 33:26 | 16 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 6-17 | 0-2 | 4-6 | 35.3% |
| 2026-02-04 | Arizona St. | L 63–71 | 30:26 | 6 | 5 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 2 | 2-16 | 0-4 | 2-2 | 12.5% |
| 2026-01-31 | Oklahoma St. | L 69–81 | 33:55 | 20 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 8-16 | 0-1 | 4-7 | 50.0% |
| 2026-01-24 | BYU | L 78–91 | 32:51 | 22 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 7-14 | 4-4 | 4-4 | 64.3% |
| 2026-01-20 | Kansas St. | L 78–81 | 31:53 | 33 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 6 | 4 | 14-24 | 4-7 | 1-2 | 66.7% |
| 2026-01-17 | TCU | W 82–79 | 33:13 | 26 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 9-15 | 4-5 | 4-5 | 73.3% |
| 2026-01-14 | Texas Tech | L 74–88 | 29:03 | 17 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 6-13 | 1-4 | 4-4 | 50.0% |
| 2026-01-10 | BYU | L 84–89 | 35:32 | 25 | 3 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 10-21 | 0-2 | 5-5 | 47.6% |
| 2026-01-07 | Colorado | L 73–85 | 32:35 | 16 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 5-17 | 0-2 | 6-8 | 29.4% |
| 2026-01-03 | Arizona | L 78–97 | 33:41 | 26 | 4 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 10-20 | 1-1 | 5-5 | 52.5% |
| 2025-12-29 | Washington | L 65–74 | 31:51 | 21 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 5 | 2 | 8-19 | 0-4 | 5-7 | 42.1% |
| 2025-12-20 | Eastern Wash. | W 101–77 | 32:36 | 20 | 3 | 11 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 6-13 | 0-3 | 8-10 | 46.2% |
| 2025-12-13 | Mississippi St. | L 74–82 | 29:53 | 22 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 7-15 | 1-4 | 7-8 | 50.0% |
| 2025-12-06 | California Baptist | W 91–85 | 33:28 | 27 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 9-16 | 2-3 | 7-8 | 62.5% |
| 2025-12-02 | California | L 72–79 | 31:08 | 15 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 5-13 | 1-4 | 4-6 | 42.3% |
| 2025-11-27 | Ole Miss | W 75–74 | 28:20 | 14 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 3-11 | 2-4 | 6-8 | 36.4% |
| 2025-11-26 | Grand Canyon | L 58–68 | 29:01 | 9 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 3-11 | 1-1 | 2-5 | 31.8% |
| 2025-11-20 | Cal Poly | L 85–92 | 35:32 | 29 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 11-18 | 2-5 | 5-6 | 66.7% |
| 2025-11-18 | Purdue Fort Wayne | W 85–77 | 31:03 | 27 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 7-14 | 5-8 | 8-8 | 67.9% |
| 2025-11-15 | Sam Houston | W 85–79 | 28:48 | 26 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 6-16 | 1-6 | 13-15 | 40.6% |
| 2025-11-10 | Holy Cross | W 87–69 | 29:42 | 21 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 8-16 | 0-3 | 5-8 | 50.0% |
| 2025-11-08 | Weber St. | W 92–89 | 37:24 | 36 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 13-23 | 0-2 | 10-15 | 56.5% |
| 2025-11-03 | San Jose St. | W 84–75 | 32:35 | 12 | 3 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 4-13 | 0-4 | 4-4 | 30.8% |