Seydou Traore
Utah · 2025–26 · 31 available game logs · Speculative compensation · Model-implied values by season · Linked seasons and observed career performance
Logged performance
888:48 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 31
- Minutes per game
- 28:40
- Points per game
- 9.0
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 3.4 / 2.0
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 9.0 | 3.4 | 2.0 | 1.2 | 0.5 | 1.8 | 2.3 |
| Per 40 minutes | 12.6 | 4.8 | 2.7 | 1.7 | 0.7 | 2.5 | 3.2 |
| Season totals | 279 | 106 | 61 | 38 | 15 | 56 | 72 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 98–254 | 38.6% | 8.2 | 11.4 |
| 2P | 55–125 | 44.0% | 4.0 | 5.6 |
| 3P | 43–129 | 33.3% | 4.2 | 5.8 |
| FT | 40–55 | 72.7% | 1.8 | 2.5 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 47.0% | 50.1% | 50.8% | 21.7% | 1.09 |
Accepted logged appearances only; absent games are not zeroes. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
Utah · Power 4 · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $320K
- 80% range $29K to $570K
- Median share of team pool
- 10.0%
- team pool $3.55M, 80% range $2.55M to $4.95M
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $320K in all four
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $26K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 69.6%
- Sufficient evidence
- Range driven by assumption, not data
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. House-settlement $20.5M cap (College Sports Commission, 2026-10-01) times a modelled utilisation of about 97 percent times a men's basketball share of about 18 percent (school statements and an industry study); Power 4 schools are at or near the cap nationally.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
Utah: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ
Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Utah | $320Kspeculative | $29K to $570K | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | -0.4 | -1.6 to +0.5 | Sufficient evidence | -0.2 | -0.1 | +3.5range +2.9 to +3.9 | 2,662 | Season detail | |
| 2025 | Iowa | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | -0.6 | -2.0 to +1.0 | Sufficient evidence | -0.7 | +0.1 | +1.4range +1.1 to +1.8 | 1,341 | Season detail | |
| 2024 | Manhattan | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | +0.0 | -1.0 to +1.2 | Sufficient evidence | +0.0 | -0.0 | +2.1range +1.7 to +2.5 | 1,662 | Season detail |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology
Game log
| Measure | Graphic | Last five | Listed games | Range |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minutes | 29:54 | 28:40 | 17:22–35:21 | |
| Points | 7.2 | 9.0 | 0.0–23.0 | |
| Game eFG% | 43.6% | 45.0% | 0.0%–82.1% |
| Date | Opponent | Result | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF | FG | 3P | FT | eFG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-10 | Cincinnati | L 66–73 | 35:09 | 12 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 5-11 | 2-5 | 0-0 | 54.5% |
| 2026-03-07 | Baylor | L 75–101 | 23:22 | 7 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 1-5 | 1-3 | 4-4 | 30.0% |
| 2026-03-03 | Colorado | L 78–92 | 28:26 | 9 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 2-4 | 2-2 | 3-4 | 75.0% |
| 2026-02-28 | Arizona St. | L 60–73 | 29:04 | 5 | 6 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2-7 | 0-3 | 1-1 | 28.6% |
| 2026-02-24 | Iowa St. | L 59–75 | 33:27 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1-5 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 30.0% |
| 2026-02-21 | UCF | L 71–73 | 29:47 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 1-8 | 0-4 | 0-0 | 12.5% |
| 2026-02-18 | West Virginia | W 61–56 | 34:43 | 17 | 6 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 6-13 | 3-4 | 2-5 | 57.7% |
| 2026-02-15 | Cincinnati | L 65–69 | 33:55 | 10 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 3-8 | 2-3 | 2-2 | 50.0% |
| 2026-02-10 | Houston | L 52–66 | 31:52 | 12 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 5-9 | 1-3 | 1-2 | 61.1% |
| 2026-02-07 | Kansas | L 59–71 | 35:21 | 5 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 1-5 | 0-3 | 3-4 | 20.0% |
| 2026-02-04 | Arizona St. | L 63–71 | 31:44 | 16 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 6-13 | 4-9 | 0-2 | 61.5% |
| 2026-01-31 | Oklahoma St. | L 69–81 | 27:11 | 10 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3-9 | 1-6 | 3-4 | 38.9% |
| 2026-01-24 | BYU | L 78–91 | 27:44 | 7 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3-11 | 1-7 | 0-0 | 31.8% |
| 2026-01-20 | Kansas St. | L 78–81 | 29:52 | 15 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 7-12 | 1-4 | 0-0 | 62.5% |
| 2026-01-17 | TCU | W 82–79 | 32:57 | 11 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 4-10 | 2-6 | 1-2 | 50.0% |
| 2026-01-14 | Texas Tech | L 74–88 | 28:27 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1-8 | 0-3 | 1-1 | 12.5% |
| 2026-01-10 | BYU | L 84–89 | 22:44 | 9 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 3-7 | 0-3 | 3-4 | 42.9% |
| 2026-01-07 | Colorado | L 73–85 | 17:22 | 7 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2-7 | 1-3 | 2-2 | 35.7% |
| 2026-01-03 | Arizona | L 78–97 | 19:17 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 2-4 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 62.5% |
| 2025-12-29 | Washington | L 65–74 | 28:47 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 2-8 | 0-4 | 0-0 | 25.0% |
| 2025-12-20 | Eastern Wash. | W 101–77 | 26:50 | 10 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 4-8 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 62.5% |
| 2025-12-13 | Mississippi St. | L 74–82 | 32:36 | 4 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 1-5 | 1-3 | 1-2 | 30.0% |
| 2025-12-02 | California | L 72–79 | 28:45 | 14 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 4-9 | 1-3 | 5-5 | 50.0% |
| 2025-11-27 | Ole Miss | W 75–74 | 22:29 | 6 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 5 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 2-2 | 50.0% |
| 2025-11-26 | Grand Canyon | L 58–68 | 27:25 | 7 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 5 | 3-9 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 38.9% |
| 2025-11-20 | Cal Poly | L 85–92 | 23:52 | 9 | 5 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 6 | 5 | 3-8 | 2-6 | 1-2 | 50.0% |
| 2025-11-18 | Purdue Fort Wayne | W 85–77 | 28:12 | 17 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 5-9 | 4-8 | 3-4 | 77.8% |
| 2025-11-15 | Sam Houston | W 85–79 | 28:35 | 10 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 4-8 | 2-3 | 0-0 | 62.5% |
| 2025-11-10 | Holy Cross | W 87–69 | 26:24 | 10 | 8 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 3-8 | 2-4 | 2-2 | 50.0% |
| 2025-11-08 | Weber St. | W 92–89 | 34:41 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 0-8 | 0-7 | 0-0 | 0.0% |
| 2025-11-03 | San Jose St. | W 84–75 | 27:48 | 23 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 9-14 | 5-8 | 0-1 | 82.1% |