Kohl Rosario
Kansas · 2025–26 · 29 available game logs · Speculative compensation · Model-implied values by season · Linked seasons and observed career performance
Logged performance
334:56 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 29
- Minutes per game
- 11:33
- Points per game
- 3.4
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 1.3 / 0.4
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 3.4 | 1.3 | 0.4 | 0.3 | 0.2 | 0.4 | 1.4 |
| Per 40 minutes | 11.7 | 4.5 | 1.6 | 1.0 | 0.6 | 1.4 | 5.0 |
| Season totals | 98 | 38 | 13 | 8 | 5 | 12 | 42 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 37–87 | 42.5%† | 3.0 | 10.4 |
| 2P | 19–24 | 79.2%† | 0.8 | 2.9 |
| 3P | 18–63 | 28.6% | 2.2 | 7.5 |
| FT | 6–8 | 75.0%† | 0.3 | 1.0 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 52.9%† | 54.1%† | 72.4%† | 9.2%† | 1.08 |
Accepted logged appearances only; absent games are not zeroes. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25); the field-goal floor applies to the derived rates above. Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
Kansas · Power 4 · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $84K
- 80% range $27K to $160K
- Median share of team pool
- 2.5%
- team pool $3.55M, 80% range $2.55M to $4.95M
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $84K in all four
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $23K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 22.7%
- Sufficient evidence
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. House-settlement $20.5M cap (College Sports Commission, 2026-10-01) times a modelled utilisation of about 97 percent times a men's basketball share of about 18 percent (school statements and an industry study); Power 4 schools are at or near the cap nationally.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
Kansas: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ
Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Kansas | $84Kspeculative | $27K to $160K | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | +0.5 | -0.5 to +1.4 | Sufficient evidence | +0.0 | +0.4 | +1.6range +1.4 to +1.8 | 1,063 | Season detail |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology
Game log
| Measure | Graphic | Last five | Listed games | Range |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minutes | 8:38 | 11:33 | 0:27–25:00 | |
| Points | 4.0 | 3.4 | 0.0–16.0 | |
| Game eFG% | 76.0% | 45.7% | 0.0%–125.0% |
| Date | Opponent | Result | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF | FG | 3P | FT | eFG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-22 | St. John's (NY) | L 65–67 | 9:50 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2-2 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 125.0% |
| 2026-03-13 | Houston | L 47–69 | 10:56 | 8 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3-5 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 80.0% |
| 2026-03-07 | Kansas St. | W 104–85 | 7:42 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 2-2 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 125.0% |
| 2026-03-03 | Arizona St. | L 60–70 | 7:31 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1-2 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 50.0% |
| 2026-02-28 | Arizona | L 61–84 | 7:12 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0.0% |
| 2026-02-23 | Houston | W 69–56 | 0:27 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | — |
| 2026-02-21 | Cincinnati | L 68–84 | 3:59 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 100.0% |
| 2026-02-18 | Oklahoma St. | W 81–69 | 5:28 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1-2 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 75.0% |
| 2026-02-14 | Iowa St. | L 56–74 | 9:33 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 2-2 | 0.0% |
| 2026-02-09 | Arizona | W 82–78 | 5:26 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0.0% |
| 2026-02-07 | Utah | W 71–59 | 6:04 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0.0% |
| 2026-02-02 | Texas Tech | W 64–61 | 8:21 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0-2 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0.0% |
| 2026-01-16 | Baylor | W 80–62 | 1:38 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0.0% |
| 2026-01-10 | West Virginia | L 75–86 | 4:49 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | — |
| 2026-01-06 | TCU | W 104–100 | 6:47 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0.0% |
| 2026-01-03 | UCF | L 75–81 | 19:21 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0-2 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0.0% |
| 2025-12-22 | Davidson | W 90–61 | 19:28 | 13 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 5-10 | 3-7 | 0-0 | 65.0% |
| 2025-12-16 | Towson | W 73–49 | 17:19 | 3 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 1-6 | 1-6 | 0-0 | 25.0% |
| 2025-12-13 | NC State | W 77–76 | 7:31 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 100.0% |
| 2025-12-07 | Missouri | W 80–60 | 3:12 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0.0% |
| 2025-12-02 | UConn | L 56–61 | 5:11 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1-2 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 50.0% |
| 2025-11-26 | Tennessee | W 81–76 | 13:28 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2-6 | 1-5 | 0-0 | 41.7% |
| 2025-11-25 | Syracuse | W 71–60 | 20:10 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 3-4 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 87.5% |
| 2025-11-24 | Notre Dame | W 71–61 | 19:46 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0.0% |
| 2025-11-18 | Duke | L 66–78 | 25:00 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2-7 | 0-5 | 0-0 | 28.6% |
| 2025-11-15 | Princeton | W 76–57 | 23:34 | 6 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 2-3 | 2-3 | 0-0 | 100.0% |
| 2025-11-11 | A&M-Corpus Christi | W 77–46 | 24:03 | 16 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 6-10 | 2-6 | 2-2 | 70.0% |
| 2025-11-07 | North Carolina | L 74–87 | 20:18 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2-4 | 2-4 | 1-2 | 75.0% |
| 2025-11-03 | Green Bay | W 94–51 | 20:52 | 6 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2-7 | 1-6 | 1-2 | 35.7% |