Flory Bidunga
Kansas · 2025–26 · 35 available game logs · Speculative compensation · Model-implied values by season · Linked seasons and observed career performance
Logged performance
1100:18 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 35
- Minutes per game
- 31:26
- Points per game
- 13.3
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 9.0 / 1.5
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 13.3 | 9.0 | 1.5 | 0.7 | 2.6 | 1.5 | 2.4 |
| Per 40 minutes | 16.9 | 11.4 | 1.9 | 0.9 | 3.3 | 2.0 | 3.0 |
| Season totals | 464 | 314 | 52 | 26 | 91 | 54 | 83 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 197–308 | 64.0% | 8.8 | 11.2 |
| 2P | 197–306 | 64.4% | 8.7 | 11.1 |
| 3P | 0–2 | 0.0%† | 0.1 | 0.1 |
| FT | 70–107 | 65.4% | 3.1 | 3.9 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 64.0% | 65.3% | 0.6% | 34.7% | 0.96 |
Accepted logged appearances only; absent games are not zeroes. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
Kansas · Power 4 · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $1.05M
- 80% range $650K to $2.05M
- Median share of team pool
- 29.0%
- team pool $3.55M, 80% range $2.55M to $4.95M
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $1.05M in all four
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $23K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 78.4%
- Sufficient evidence
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. House-settlement $20.5M cap (College Sports Commission, 2026-10-01) times a modelled utilisation of about 97 percent times a men's basketball share of about 18 percent (school statements and an industry study); Power 4 schools are at or near the cap nationally.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
Kansas: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ
Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Kansas | $1.05Mspeculative | $650K to $2.05M | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | +7.6 | +5.9 to +9.4 | Sufficient evidence | +2.1 | +5.4 | +9.6range +8.5 to +10.7 | 3,674 | Season detail | |
| 2025 | Kansas | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | +2.5 | +0.8 to +4.0 | Sufficient evidence | +0.5 | +2.0 | +2.7range +2.2 to +3.2 | 1,844 | Season detail |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology
Game log
| Measure | Graphic | Last five | Listed games | Range |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minutes | 28:41 | 31:26 | 19:08–40:31 | |
| Points | 9.8 | 13.3 | 2.0–25.0 | |
| Game eFG% | 65.0% | 64.5% | 20.0%–100.0% |
| Date | Opponent | Result | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF | FG | 3P | FT | eFG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-22 | St. John's (NY) | L 65–67 | 30:44 | 12 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 6-9 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 66.7% |
| 2026-03-20 | California Baptist | W 68–60 | 29:58 | 6 | 7 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 2-6 | 0-0 | 2-4 | 33.3% |
| 2026-03-13 | Houston | L 47–69 | 30:57 | 5 | 12 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 1-4 | 0-0 | 3-6 | 25.0% |
| 2026-03-12 | TCU | W 78–73 | 26:01 | 13 | 10 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 5-5 | 0-0 | 3-4 | 100.0% |
| 2026-03-07 | Kansas St. | W 104–85 | 25:45 | 13 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 6-6 | 0-0 | 1-3 | 100.0% |
| 2026-03-03 | Arizona St. | L 60–70 | 37:27 | 14 | 13 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 6-14 | 0-0 | 2-3 | 42.9% |
| 2026-02-28 | Arizona | L 61–84 | 32:02 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 1-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 20.0% |
| 2026-02-23 | Houston | W 69–56 | 35:18 | 4 | 7 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 33.3% |
| 2026-02-21 | Cincinnati | L 68–84 | 33:58 | 18 | 12 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 8-10 | 0-0 | 2-2 | 80.0% |
| 2026-02-18 | Oklahoma St. | W 81–69 | 32:07 | 8 | 11 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 4-10 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 40.0% |
| 2026-02-14 | Iowa St. | L 56–74 | 34:15 | 11 | 13 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 5-13 | 0-1 | 1-2 | 38.5% |
| 2026-02-09 | Arizona | W 82–78 | 33:47 | 23 | 10 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 8-11 | 0-0 | 7-9 | 72.7% |
| 2026-02-07 | Utah | W 71–59 | 30:40 | 17 | 10 | 3 | 0 | 7 | 1 | 2 | 7-8 | 0-0 | 3-4 | 87.5% |
| 2026-02-02 | Texas Tech | W 64–61 | 35:12 | 14 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 7-8 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 87.5% |
| 2026-01-31 | BYU | W 90–82 | 33:01 | 16 | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 5-7 | 0-0 | 6-11 | 71.4% |
| 2026-01-24 | Kansas St. | W 86–62 | 33:12 | 21 | 10 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 10-13 | 0-0 | 1-4 | 76.9% |
| 2026-01-20 | Colorado | W 75–69 | 32:54 | 11 | 9 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 4-5 | 0-0 | 3-3 | 80.0% |
| 2026-01-16 | Baylor | W 80–62 | 30:52 | 23 | 11 | 1 | 2 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 11-14 | 0-0 | 1-1 | 78.6% |
| 2026-01-13 | Iowa St. | W 84–63 | 31:45 | 10 | 7 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 5-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 83.3% |
| 2026-01-10 | West Virginia | L 75–86 | 28:42 | 8 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 4-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 66.7% |
| 2026-01-06 | TCU | W 104–100 | 40:31 | 16 | 9 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 6-7 | 0-0 | 4-6 | 85.7% |
| 2026-01-03 | UCF | L 75–81 | 28:30 | 8 | 9 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 4 | 3-5 | 0-0 | 2-4 | 60.0% |
| 2025-12-22 | Davidson | W 90–61 | 26:40 | 18 | 8 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 8-11 | 0-0 | 2-2 | 72.7% |
| 2025-12-16 | Towson | W 73–49 | 26:47 | 18 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 7-8 | 0-0 | 4-7 | 87.5% |
| 2025-12-13 | NC State | W 77–76 | 31:50 | 8 | 11 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 4-7 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 57.1% |
| 2025-12-07 | Missouri | W 80–60 | 25:45 | 10 | 11 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 4-9 | 0-0 | 2-2 | 44.4% |
| 2025-12-02 | UConn | L 56–61 | 37:01 | 11 | 12 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 4-9 | 0-0 | 3-6 | 44.4% |
| 2025-11-26 | Tennessee | W 81–76 | 37:48 | 13 | 7 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 5-15 | 0-0 | 3-4 | 33.3% |
| 2025-11-25 | Syracuse | W 71–60 | 34:23 | 13 | 14 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 7 | 2 | 5-8 | 0-1 | 3-3 | 62.5% |
| 2025-11-24 | Notre Dame | W 71–61 | 33:57 | 18 | 9 | 5 | 0 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 8-15 | 0-0 | 2-3 | 53.3% |
| 2025-11-18 | Duke | L 66–78 | 31:52 | 14 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 7-10 | 0-0 | 0-2 | 70.0% |
| 2025-11-15 | Princeton | W 76–57 | 27:28 | 25 | 10 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 10-11 | 0-0 | 5-6 | 90.9% |
| 2025-11-11 | A&M-Corpus Christi | W 77–46 | 19:08 | 12 | 8 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 6-7 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 85.7% |
| 2025-11-07 | North Carolina | L 74–87 | 35:28 | 8 | 7 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 4-9 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 44.4% |
| 2025-11-03 | Green Bay | W 94–51 | 24:33 | 23 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 9-11 | 0-0 | 5-6 | 81.8% |