Darryn Peterson
Kansas · 2025–26 · 24 available game logs · Speculative compensation · Model-implied values by season · Linked seasons and observed career performance
Logged performance
699:06 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 24
- Minutes per game
- 29:08
- Points per game
- 20.2
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 4.2 / 1.6
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 20.2 | 4.2 | 1.6 | 1.4 | 0.6 | 1.6 | 1.5 |
| Per 40 minutes | 27.7 | 5.8 | 2.2 | 1.9 | 0.9 | 2.2 | 2.1 |
| Season totals | 484 | 101 | 38 | 34 | 15 | 38 | 37 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 156–356 | 43.8% | 14.8 | 20.4 |
| 2P | 93–191 | 48.7% | 8.0 | 10.9 |
| 3P | 63–165 | 38.2% | 6.9 | 9.4 |
| FT | 109–132 | 82.6% | 5.5 | 7.6 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 52.7% | 58.4% | 46.3% | 37.1% | 1.00 |
Accepted logged appearances only; absent games are not zeroes. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
Kansas · Power 4 · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $300K
- 80% range $140K to $475K
- Median share of team pool
- 9.0%
- team pool $3.55M, 80% range $2.55M to $4.95M
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $300K in all four
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $23K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 51.8%
- Sufficient evidence
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. House-settlement $20.5M cap (College Sports Commission, 2026-10-01) times a modelled utilisation of about 97 percent times a men's basketball share of about 18 percent (school statements and an industry study); Power 4 schools are at or near the cap nationally.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
Kansas: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ
Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Kansas | $300Kspeculative | $140K to $475K | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | +2.8 | +1.5 to +4.3 | Sufficient evidence | +1.6 | +1.2 | +4.7range +4.0 to +5.3 | 2,428 | Season detail |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology
Game log
| Measure | Graphic | Last five | Listed games | Range |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minutes | 33:00 | 29:08 | 18:12–36:52 | |
| Points | 22.8 | 20.2 | 10.0–32.0 | |
| Game eFG% | 47.2% | 54.3% | 22.2%–93.8% |
| Date | Opponent | Result | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF | FG | 3P | FT | eFG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-22 | St. John's (NY) | L 65–67 | 34:52 | 21 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 5-15 | 3-8 | 8-10 | 43.3% |
| 2026-03-20 | California Baptist | W 68–60 | 36:52 | 28 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 11-24 | 4-11 | 2-2 | 54.2% |
| 2026-03-13 | Houston | L 47–69 | 27:37 | 14 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 3-11 | 2-5 | 6-6 | 36.4% |
| 2026-03-12 | TCU | W 78–73 | 36:41 | 24 | 8 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 5-17 | 1-4 | 13-16 | 32.4% |
| 2026-03-07 | Kansas St. | W 104–85 | 29:00 | 27 | 5 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 10-15 | 1-2 | 6-7 | 70.0% |
| 2026-03-03 | Arizona St. | L 60–70 | 33:37 | 15 | 10 | 4 | 5 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3-18 | 2-11 | 7-8 | 22.2% |
| 2026-02-28 | Arizona | L 61–84 | 30:35 | 24 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 8-21 | 3-8 | 5-5 | 45.2% |
| 2026-02-23 | Houston | W 69–56 | 29:56 | 14 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 5-14 | 2-7 | 2-2 | 42.9% |
| 2026-02-21 | Cincinnati | L 68–84 | 31:49 | 17 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 7-17 | 1-7 | 2-3 | 44.1% |
| 2026-02-18 | Oklahoma St. | W 81–69 | 18:12 | 23 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 7-12 | 6-10 | 3-4 | 83.3% |
| 2026-02-14 | Iowa St. | L 56–74 | 23:31 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 3-10 | 2-6 | 2-2 | 40.0% |
| 2026-02-07 | Utah | W 71–59 | 33:48 | 14 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 5-12 | 1-5 | 3-5 | 45.8% |
| 2026-02-02 | Texas Tech | W 64–61 | 34:38 | 19 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 5-14 | 3-7 | 6-8 | 46.4% |
| 2026-01-31 | BYU | W 90–82 | 20:12 | 18 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 6-8 | 3-5 | 3-4 | 93.8% |
| 2026-01-20 | Colorado | W 75–69 | 31:38 | 16 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 6-15 | 3-5 | 1-2 | 50.0% |
| 2026-01-16 | Baylor | W 80–62 | 22:15 | 26 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 11-13 | 2-4 | 2-4 | 92.3% |
| 2026-01-13 | Iowa St. | W 84–63 | 27:18 | 16 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 6-15 | 2-7 | 2-2 | 46.7% |
| 2026-01-10 | West Virginia | L 75–86 | 31:01 | 23 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 6-17 | 3-9 | 8-8 | 44.1% |
| 2026-01-06 | TCU | W 104–100 | 32:04 | 32 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 8-18 | 3-8 | 13-15 | 52.8% |
| 2026-01-03 | UCF | L 75–81 | 23:07 | 26 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 8-17 | 5-10 | 5-6 | 61.8% |
| 2025-12-13 | NC State | W 77–76 | 36:01 | 17 | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 7-14 | 2-5 | 1-2 | 57.1% |
| 2025-12-07 | Missouri | W 80–60 | 23:35 | 17 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6-14 | 3-9 | 2-2 | 53.6% |
| 2025-11-07 | North Carolina | L 74–87 | 28:33 | 22 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 8-14 | 3-5 | 3-5 | 67.9% |
| 2025-11-03 | Green Bay | W 94–51 | 22:14 | 21 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 7-11 | 3-7 | 4-4 | 77.3% |