Algosys College Basketball

Search teams and players

Type a team or player name. Results are alphabetical; players show their 2026 team. Up and Down move, Enter opens the highlighted result or the first one, Esc closes.

Malik Mack

Georgetown · 2025–26 · 33 available game logs · Speculative compensation · Model-implied values by season · Linked seasons and observed career performance

Logged performance

1066:29 minutes logged

Games logged
33
Minutes per game
32:19
Points per game
13.5
Rebounds / assists per game
2.8 / 4.2
Box line on three bases
BasisPtsRebAstStlBlkTOPF
Per game13.52.84.20.80.12.01.7
Per 40 minutes16.73.55.31.00.22.42.1
Season totals444941402746556
Shooting with attempts
ShotMade–att.PctAtt/GAtt/40
FG149–39038.2%11.814.6
2P96–21145.5%6.47.9
3P53–17929.6%5.46.7
FT93–11580.9%3.54.3
Derived rates (computed here from the box line, not published statistics)
eFG%Estimated TS%3PA / FGAFTA / FGAAST / TO
45.0%50.4%45.9%29.5%2.15

Accepted logged appearances only; absent games are not zeroes. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions

Speculative compensation · 2025–26β

Georgetown · Big East and Gonzaga · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.

Speculative best guess
$670K
80% range $330K to $1.30M
Median share of team pool
17.7%
team pool $3.65M, 80% range $2.05M to $6.35M
Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
$655K to $675K
the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
Floor part
$23K
shared by every player with possessions
Possession share
81.2%
Sufficient evidence
Point and 80% range on the team table's axis. Open circle: limited evidence or floor only.

Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.

Budget anchor. Tier prior from anonymous surveys and sources, scaled so that all non-Power budgets sum to the national total the College Sports Commission reported paid for 2025-26 ($1,770,453,776 over 307 schools) less the Power 4 total, times a men's basketball share; weak anchor.

Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks

Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.

Georgetown: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player

No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.

What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ

Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.

Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ

Net points per 100 possessions by season, newest first. The speculative compensation best guess for 2025–26 only sits right after the team, so it is the first figure after the season. Ordered by season, not by value or dollars. Compensation is a best guess of a share of the school’s own revenue-sharing budget, not observed pay.
SeasonTeamSpeculative compensation (best guess)Compensation 80% rangeSplit roleNetRangeEvidenceRange graphic. Position on one axisOffenseDefenseWins above replacementOn-court possessionsSample and flags
2026Georgetown$670Kspeculative$330K to $1.30Mdescriptive: not used in fit or gates+2.0+1.0 to +2.9Sufficient evidence+1.9+0.1+6.0range +5.3 to +6.53,296Season detail
2025GeorgetownNone: no budget that season—evaluation: examined, post hoc+0.1-0.7 to +1.1Sufficient evidence+0.7-0.6+3.6range +3.2 to +4.33,107Season detail
2024HarvardNone: no budget that season—evaluation: examined, post hoc+1.4+0.5 to +2.3Sufficient evidence+1.4-0.0+3.0range +2.6 to +3.52,304Season detail

Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology

Game log

Game log, box line per game. eFG% is computed for the game from field goals and three-pointers; it is blank without a field-goal attempt.
DateOpponentResultMinPtsRebAstStlBlkTOPFFG3PFTeFG
2026-03-13UConnL 51–6731:4795100224-110-31-236.4%
2026-03-12VillanovaW 78–6437:00123600214-153-71-236.7%
2026-03-11DePaulW 63–5634:13166400426-120-34-450.0%
2026-03-07ProvidenceW 80–7939:01112430134-110-33-536.4%
2026-03-03St. John's (NY)L 69–7233:29155501527-130-31-253.8%
2026-02-28XavierL 84–9137:20173320425-105-102-275.0%
2026-02-24MarquetteL 60–7636:0991510004-160-61-225.0%
2026-02-21Seton HallL 47–5132:3991231223-71-42-450.0%
2026-02-18ButlerL 89–9329:09102710023-62-42-266.7%
2026-02-14UConnL 75–7927:0080200343-82-30-050.0%
2026-02-07VillanovaL 73–8030:59213300317-153-94-556.7%
2026-02-04CreightonW 76–6830:25206220114-102-610-1150.0%
2026-01-31ButlerW 77–6425:39140600115-122-72-250.0%
2026-01-28DePaulW 70–6130:01162700123-80-210-1037.5%
2026-01-24ProvidenceW 81–7835:05132310016-121-50-054.2%
2026-01-21VillanovaL 51–6627:5952510211-141-92-210.7%
2026-01-17UConnL 62–6429:42112300334-101-42-245.0%
2026-01-13CreightonL 83–8632:56172400337-101-32-275.0%
2026-01-10Seton HallL 67–7634:46145201324-161-65-728.1%
2026-01-06DePaulL 50–5632:4593110232-120-35-616.7%
2025-12-31St. John's (NY)L 83–9538:13183810017-154-70-060.0%
2025-12-22Coppin St.W 97–6729:2976510212-91-72-227.8%
2025-12-20XavierL 77–8032:39212310108-193-102-550.0%
2025-12-17MarquetteW 78–6933:55133510315-121-32-245.8%
2025-12-13Saint Peter'sW 76–6829:5875400541-51-24-530.0%
2025-12-07North CarolinaL 61–8128:4991400223-171-72-220.6%
2025-12-03UMBCW 90–8131:31152730316-103-50-175.0%
2025-11-28Miami (FL)L 65–7833:29163710113-112-68-1036.4%
2025-11-27DaytonL 79–8444:01244420219-204-122-255.0%
2025-11-22 · NCAAWagnerW 92–7528:54182501006-154-72-253.3%
2025-11-15ClemsonW 79–7436:33163710235-92-54-566.7%
2025-11-12BinghamtonW 83–7026:58133210125-111-32-250.0%
2025-11-03Morgan St.W 87–7023:56112400113-91-54-538.9%