Caleb Williams
Georgetown · 2025–26 · 32 available game logs · Speculative compensation · Model-implied values by season · Linked seasons and observed career performance
Logged performance
959:49 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 32
- Minutes per game
- 30:00
- Points per game
- 8.6
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 5.0 / 1.5
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 8.6 | 5.0 | 1.5 | 0.6 | 0.2 | 0.9 | 2.3 |
| Per 40 minutes | 11.5 | 6.6 | 2.0 | 0.8 | 0.2 | 1.2 | 3.0 |
| Season totals | 276 | 159 | 49 | 18 | 5 | 28 | 72 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 97–220 | 44.1% | 6.9 | 9.2 |
| 2P | 55–108 | 50.9% | 3.4 | 4.5 |
| 3P | 42–112 | 37.5% | 3.5 | 4.7 |
| FT | 40–53 | 75.5% | 1.7 | 2.2 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 53.6% | 56.7% | 50.9% | 24.1% | 1.75 |
Accepted logged appearances only; absent games are not zeroes. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
Georgetown · Big East and Gonzaga · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $340K
- 80% range $69K to $700K
- Median share of team pool
- 10.7%
- team pool $3.65M, 80% range $2.05M to $6.35M
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $335K to $345K
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $23K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 71.9%
- Sufficient evidence
- Range driven by assumption, not data
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. Tier prior from anonymous surveys and sources, scaled so that all non-Power budgets sum to the national total the College Sports Commission reported paid for 2025-26 ($1,770,453,776 over 307 schools) less the Power 4 total, times a men's basketball share; weak anchor.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
Georgetown: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ
Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Georgetown | $340Kspeculative | $69K to $700K | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | +0.3 | -0.6 to +1.2 | Sufficient evidence | +0.1 | +0.1 | +4.7range +4.2 to +5.2 | 2,916 | Season detail | |
| 2025 | Georgetown | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | +1.1 | -0.0 to +2.1 | Sufficient evidence | -0.7 | +1.8 | +2.1range +1.8 to +2.5 | 1,593 | Season detail |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology
Game log
| Measure | Graphic | Last five | Listed games | Range |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minutes | 27:38 | 30:00 | 21:00–40:42 | |
| Points | 6.2 | 8.6 | 2.0–23.0 | |
| Game eFG% | 47.9% | 53.7% | 0.0%–133.3% |
| Date | Opponent | Result | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF | FG | 3P | FT | eFG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-13 | UConn | L 51–67 | 33:12 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2-5 | 1-4 | 0-2 | 50.0% |
| 2026-03-12 | Villanova | W 78–64 | 22:26 | 11 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 4-6 | 2-4 | 1-2 | 83.3% |
| 2026-03-11 | DePaul | W 63–56 | 30:21 | 2 | 7 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1-5 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 20.0% |
| 2026-03-07 | Providence | W 80–79 | 31:10 | 11 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 4-9 | 3-6 | 0-0 | 61.1% |
| 2026-03-03 | St. John's (NY) | L 69–72 | 21:00 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 1-4 | 0-3 | 0-0 | 25.0% |
| 2026-02-28 | Xavier | L 84–91 | 28:13 | 9 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 4-9 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 50.0% |
| 2026-02-24 | Marquette | L 60–76 | 29:31 | 5 | 6 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2-8 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 31.3% |
| 2026-02-21 | Seton Hall | L 47–51 | 32:51 | 7 | 7 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 2-8 | 0-4 | 3-4 | 25.0% |
| 2026-02-18 | Butler | L 89–93 | 33:10 | 16 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5-8 | 3-5 | 3-4 | 81.3% |
| 2026-02-14 | UConn | L 75–79 | 22:42 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 50.0% |
| 2026-02-07 | Villanova | L 73–80 | 31:12 | 5 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1-7 | 1-5 | 2-4 | 21.4% |
| 2026-02-04 | Creighton | W 76–68 | 36:57 | 7 | 10 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 3-9 | 1-4 | 0-0 | 38.9% |
| 2026-01-31 | Butler | W 77–64 | 29:19 | 8 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 3-3 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 133.3% |
| 2026-01-28 | DePaul | W 70–61 | 34:13 | 10 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 4-8 | 2-3 | 0-0 | 62.5% |
| 2026-01-24 | Providence | W 81–78 | 32:27 | 8 | 7 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3-7 | 1-4 | 1-2 | 50.0% |
| 2026-01-21 | Villanova | L 51–66 | 33:28 | 9 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3-6 | 3-5 | 0-0 | 75.0% |
| 2026-01-17 | UConn | L 62–64 | 28:37 | 6 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2-6 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 50.0% |
| 2026-01-13 | Creighton | L 83–86 | 29:53 | 12 | 5 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4-4 | 2-2 | 2-2 | 125.0% |
| 2026-01-10 | Seton Hall | L 67–76 | 30:09 | 10 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3-5 | 2-3 | 2-2 | 80.0% |
| 2026-01-06 | DePaul | L 50–56 | 24:57 | 2 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 0-4 | 0-3 | 2-3 | 0.0% |
| 2025-12-31 | St. John's (NY) | L 83–95 | 28:32 | 9 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 2-6 | 0-1 | 5-5 | 33.3% |
| 2025-12-20 | Xavier | L 77–80 | 34:58 | 5 | 6 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 1-3 | 0-2 | 3-4 | 33.3% |
| 2025-12-17 | Marquette | W 78–69 | 24:59 | 11 | 6 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 4-8 | 1-4 | 2-2 | 56.3% |
| 2025-12-13 | Saint Peter's | W 76–68 | 40:42 | 14 | 8 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 4-8 | 2-5 | 4-4 | 62.5% |
| 2025-12-07 | North Carolina | L 61–81 | 30:05 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 1-4 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 25.0% |
| 2025-12-03 | UMBC | W 90–81 | 32:55 | 18 | 8 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 8-16 | 2-6 | 0-0 | 56.3% |
| 2025-11-28 | Miami (FL) | L 65–78 | 29:59 | 23 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 8-14 | 5-10 | 2-2 | 75.0% |
| 2025-11-27 | Dayton | L 79–84 | 23:02 | 4 | 9 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 5 | 1-3 | 1-1 | 1-2 | 50.0% |
| 2025-11-22 · NCAA | Wagner | W 92–75 | 37:06 | 15 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 4-9 | 1-3 | 6-6 | 50.0% |
| 2025-11-15 | Clemson | W 79–74 | 34:50 | 13 | 6 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 5-14 | 3-7 | 0-0 | 46.4% |
| 2025-11-12 | Binghamton | W 83–70 | 22:33 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3-5 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 60.0% |
| 2025-11-03 | Morgan St. | W 87–70 | 24:20 | 9 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 4-7 | 0-2 | 1-2 | 57.1% |