Andrej Stojakovic
Illinois · 2025–26 · 33 available game logs · Speculative compensation · Model-implied values by season · Linked seasons and observed career performance
Logged performance
866:48 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 33
- Minutes per game
- 26:16
- Points per game
- 13.6
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 4.5 / 0.9
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 13.6 | 4.5 | 0.9 | 0.4 | 0.5 | 1.2 | 1.5 |
| Per 40 minutes | 20.8 | 6.9 | 1.4 | 0.6 | 0.7 | 1.9 | 2.2 |
| Season totals | 450 | 149 | 31 | 13 | 15 | 41 | 48 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 164–326 | 50.3% | 9.9 | 15.0 |
| 2P | 145–247 | 58.7% | 7.5 | 11.4 |
| 3P | 19–79 | 24.1% | 2.4 | 3.6 |
| FT | 103–127 | 81.1% | 3.8 | 5.9 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 53.2% | 58.9% | 24.2% | 39.0% | 0.76 |
Accepted logged appearances only; absent games are not zeroes. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
Illinois · Power 4 · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $340K
- 80% range $195K to $520K
- Median share of team pool
- 10.0%
- team pool $3.55M, 80% range $2.55M to $4.95M
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $340K in all four
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $27K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 59.0%
- Sufficient evidence
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. House-settlement $20.5M cap (College Sports Commission, 2026-10-01) times a modelled utilisation of about 97 percent times a men's basketball share of about 18 percent (school statements and an industry study); Power 4 schools are at or near the cap nationally.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
Illinois: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ
Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Illinois | $340Kspeculative | $195K to $520K | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | +3.8 | +2.5 to +5.1 | Sufficient evidence | +3.2 | +0.6 | +4.9range +4.4 to +5.5 | 2,657 | Season detail | |
| 2025 | California | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | +1.5 | +0.6 to +2.4 | Sufficient evidence | +1.5 | +0.0 | +4.5range +3.9 to +5.1 | 715 | Season detail | |
| 2024 | Stanford | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | -1.0 | -2.7 to +0.6 | Sufficient evidence | -0.6 | -0.4 | +2.0range +1.3 to +2.7 | 2,407 | Season detail |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology
Game log
| Measure | Graphic | Last five | Listed games | Range |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minutes | 24:20 | 26:16 | 12:18–37:00 | |
| Points | 13.8 | 13.6 | 0.0–30.0 | |
| Game eFG% | 57.7% | 49.2% | 0.0%–92.9% |
| Date | Opponent | Result | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF | FG | 3P | FT | eFG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-04-04 | UConn | L 62–71 | 28:38 | 9 | 8 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 4-10 | 0-0 | 1-4 | 40.0% |
| 2026-03-28 | Iowa | W 71–59 | 25:49 | 17 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 7-9 | 0-0 | 3-4 | 77.8% |
| 2026-03-26 | Houston | W 65–55 | 22:42 | 13 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 5-8 | 1-3 | 2-2 | 68.8% |
| 2026-03-21 | VCU | W 76–55 | 25:18 | 21 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 7-12 | 0-2 | 7-9 | 58.3% |
| 2026-03-19 | Penn | W 105–70 | 19:11 | 9 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3-8 | 1-2 | 2-3 | 43.8% |
| 2026-03-13 | Wisconsin | L 88–91 | 32:20 | 17 | 7 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 6-13 | 1-2 | 4-6 | 50.0% |
| 2026-03-08 | Maryland | W 78–72 | 18:37 | 8 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2-6 | 0-2 | 4-6 | 33.3% |
| 2026-03-03 | Oregon | W 80–54 | 20:14 | 21 | 12 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7-12 | 0-2 | 7-7 | 58.3% |
| 2026-02-27 | Michigan | L 70–84 | 12:18 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0.0% |
| 2026-02-21 | UCLA | L 94–95 | 26:55 | 8 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1-5 | 0-3 | 6-9 | 20.0% |
| 2026-02-18 | Southern California | W 101–65 | 17:35 | 22 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 6-7 | 1-1 | 9-9 | 92.9% |
| 2026-02-07 | Michigan St. | L 82–85 | 34:44 | 17 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 8-14 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 60.7% |
| 2026-02-04 | Northwestern | W 84–44 | 28:20 | 17 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4-8 | 0-2 | 9-10 | 50.0% |
| 2026-02-01 | Nebraska | W 78–69 | 27:55 | 8 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2-7 | 0-2 | 4-4 | 28.6% |
| 2026-01-29 | Washington | W 75–66 | 33:12 | 8 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 4-11 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 36.4% |
| 2026-01-24 | Purdue | W 88–82 | 37:00 | 5 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 2-9 | 0-3 | 1-2 | 22.2% |
| 2026-01-21 | Maryland | W 89–70 | 33:30 | 30 | 9 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 9-18 | 4-7 | 8-8 | 61.1% |
| 2026-01-17 | Minnesota | W 77–67 | 22:06 | 7 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2-5 | 1-2 | 2-2 | 50.0% |
| 2026-01-14 | Northwestern | W 79–68 | 23:45 | 4 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2-5 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 40.0% |
| 2026-01-11 | Iowa | W 75–69 | 32:39 | 17 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 7-16 | 1-5 | 2-3 | 46.9% |
| 2026-01-08 | Rutgers | W 81–55 | 25:04 | 12 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 4-6 | 1-2 | 3-4 | 75.0% |
| 2026-01-03 | Penn St. | W 73–65 | 32:05 | 12 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 4-9 | 0-2 | 4-4 | 44.4% |
| 2025-12-29 | Southern U. | W 90–55 | 22:49 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1-5 | 0-3 | 4-4 | 20.0% |
| 2025-12-22 | Missouri | W 91–48 | 25:25 | 16 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 5-8 | 2-4 | 4-4 | 75.0% |
| 2025-12-13 | Nebraska | L 80–83 | 26:34 | 19 | 10 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 8-16 | 0-3 | 3-3 | 50.0% |
| 2025-12-09 | Ohio St. | W 88–80 | 26:46 | 17 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 5-10 | 0-3 | 7-7 | 50.0% |
| 2025-12-06 | Tennessee | W 75–62 | 20:45 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2-5 | 0-1 | 1-2 | 40.0% |
| 2025-11-28 | UConn | L 61–74 | 25:01 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1-7 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 21.4% |
| 2025-11-24 | UTRGV | W 87–73 | 30:53 | 24 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 11-17 | 1-5 | 1-1 | 67.6% |
| 2025-11-22 | LIU | W 98–58 | 24:45 | 20 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 10-15 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 66.7% |
| 2025-11-19 | Alabama | L 86–90 | 30:32 | 26 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 2 | 11-16 | 2-3 | 2-5 | 75.0% |
| 2025-11-14 | Colgate | W 84–65 | 27:53 | 9 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3-11 | 1-6 | 2-3 | 31.8% |
| 2025-11-11 | Texas Tech | W 81–77 | 25:28 | 23 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 11-16 | 0-1 | 1-2 | 68.8% |