Jordan Crawford
South Dakota · 2025–26 · 28 available game logs · Speculative compensation · Model-implied values by season · Linked seasons and observed career performance
Logged performance
886:57 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 28
- Minutes per game
- 31:41
- Points per game
- 14.6
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 2.6 / 1.4
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 14.6 | 2.6 | 1.4 | 1.1 | 0.1 | 1.3 | 1.8 |
| Per 40 minutes | 18.4 | 3.3 | 1.7 | 1.4 | 0.1 | 1.6 | 2.3 |
| Season totals | 409 | 73 | 38 | 30 | 3 | 36 | 50 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 137–335 | 40.9% | 12.0 | 15.1 |
| 2P | 66–145 | 45.5% | 5.2 | 6.5 |
| 3P | 71–190 | 37.4% | 6.8 | 8.6 |
| FT | 64–86 | 74.4% | 3.1 | 3.9 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 51.5% | 54.8% | 56.7% | 25.7% | 1.06 |
Accepted logged appearances only; absent games are not zeroes. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
South Dakota · Low and other · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $14K
- 80% range $1K to $62K
- Median share of team pool
- 10.3%
- team pool $225K, 80% range $85K to $600K
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $13K to $15K
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $1K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 79.3%
- Sufficient evidence
- Range driven by assumption, not data
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. Tier prior from anonymous surveys and sources, scaled so that all non-Power budgets sum to the national total the College Sports Commission reported paid for 2025-26 ($1,770,453,776 over 307 schools) less the Power 4 total, times a men's basketball share; weak anchor.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
South Dakota: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ
Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | South Dakota | $14Kspeculative | $1K to $62K | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | -1.2 | -2.1 to -0.2 | Sufficient evidence | +0.1 | -1.4 | +3.6range +3.2 to +4.1 | 2,750 | Season detail | |
| 2025 | E Kentucky | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | -0.6 | -1.6 to +0.4 | Sufficient evidence | -0.1 | -0.5 | +1.9range +1.6 to +2.3 | 1,586 | Season detail | |
| 2024 | Col Charleston | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | -1.1 | -2.0 to +0.1 | Sufficient evidence | +0.3 | -1.4 | +0.9range +0.7 to +1.2 | 1,168 | Season detail |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology
Game log
| Measure | Graphic | Last five | Listed games | Range |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minutes | 36:34 | 31:41 | 16:47–43:14 | |
| Points | 15.4 | 14.6 | 3.0–33.0 | |
| Game eFG% | 50.3% | 50.5% | 18.8%–91.7% |
| Date | Opponent | Result | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF | FG | 3P | FT | eFG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-06 | Omaha | L 62–76 | 39:56 | 13 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 4-15 | 3-8 | 2-4 | 36.7% |
| 2026-02-28 | South Dakota St. | W 75–70 | 37:16 | 17 | 3 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 4-10 | 1-4 | 8-9 | 45.0% |
| 2026-02-25 | Omaha | W 89–72 | 38:29 | 26 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 8-12 | 5-7 | 5-6 | 87.5% |
| 2026-02-21 | Oral Roberts | L 62–67 | 38:04 | 9 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 3-13 | 1-7 | 2-6 | 26.9% |
| 2026-02-19 | Denver | L 70–90 | 29:03 | 12 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4-9 | 2-4 | 2-3 | 55.6% |
| 2026-02-11 | North Dakota | L 71–72 | 36:48 | 12 | 4 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 4-13 | 1-8 | 3-5 | 34.6% |
| 2026-02-07 | South Dakota St. | W 68–67 | 39:35 | 19 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 7-22 | 5-14 | 0-0 | 43.2% |
| 2026-02-04 | Kansas City | W 82–75 | 38:43 | 16 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 4-16 | 4-10 | 4-6 | 37.5% |
| 2026-01-31 | North Dakota St. | L 84–89 | 43:14 | 33 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 11-19 | 7-15 | 4-4 | 76.3% |
| 2026-01-29 | Oral Roberts | W 77–69 | 32:51 | 11 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 4-12 | 1-3 | 2-4 | 37.5% |
| 2026-01-24 | St. Thomas (MN) | L 78–90 | 39:06 | 22 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 8-16 | 3-7 | 3-4 | 59.4% |
| 2026-01-21 | Omaha | W 68–64 | 38:49 | 27 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 5 | 1 | 10-16 | 5-10 | 2-2 | 78.1% |
| 2026-01-17 | North Dakota | L 80–96 | 34:11 | 24 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 8-12 | 6-8 | 2-2 | 91.7% |
| 2026-01-15 · NCAA | Kansas City | W 99–83 | 31:18 | 16 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 5-9 | 4-8 | 2-2 | 77.8% |
| 2026-01-10 | Denver | W 82–72 | 32:19 | 13 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 5-11 | 3-7 | 0-0 | 59.1% |
| 2026-01-07 | St. Thomas (MN) | L 86–99 | 24:04 | 7 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 2-5 | 1-4 | 2-2 | 50.0% |
| 2025-12-31 | North Dakota St. | L 61–84 | 32:03 | 8 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 3-11 | 2-8 | 0-0 | 36.4% |
| 2025-12-20 | Kansas St. | L 76–106 | 21:36 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1-8 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 18.8% |
| 2025-12-13 | Prairie View | W 97–85 | 24:56 | 12 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3-11 | 2-8 | 4-4 | 36.4% |
| 2025-12-09 | Wyoming | L 79–106 | 26:49 | 8 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3-7 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 57.1% |
| 2025-12-06 | Northern Colo. | L 87–89 | 29:26 | 14 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 5-9 | 1-3 | 3-3 | 61.1% |
| 2025-12-03 | Portland St. | L 71–77 | 30:19 | 9 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4-13 | 1-5 | 0-1 | 34.6% |
| 2025-11-23 | South Carolina St. | W 82–81 | 29:01 | 25 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 9-14 | 3-7 | 4-5 | 75.0% |
| 2025-11-20 | Missouri | L 68–102 | 27:26 | 18 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 7-15 | 3-9 | 1-2 | 56.7% |
| 2025-11-16 | Western Mich. | W 83–78 | 23:21 | 7 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3-9 | 0-5 | 1-1 | 33.3% |
| 2025-11-12 | Southern Ind. | W 89–74 | 16:47 | 6 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2-8 | 0-2 | 2-4 | 25.0% |
| 2025-11-05 | Creighton | L 76–92 | 25:41 | 14 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 4-9 | 3-4 | 3-3 | 61.1% |
| 2025-11-03 | Utah Tech | L 79–81 | 25:46 | 8 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2-11 | 1-8 | 3-4 | 22.7% |