Berke Buyuktuncel
Nebraska · 2025–26 · 33 available game logs · Speculative compensation · Model-implied values by season · Linked seasons and observed career performance
Logged performance
806:01 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 33
- Minutes per game
- 24:25
- Points per game
- 6.5
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 5.6 / 1.9
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 6.5 | 5.6 | 1.9 | 0.9 | 1.0 | 1.2 | 1.8 |
| Per 40 minutes | 10.7 | 9.1 | 3.1 | 1.4 | 1.7 | 1.9 | 2.9 |
| Season totals | 216 | 184 | 62 | 29 | 34 | 38 | 59 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 81–173 | 46.8% | 5.2 | 8.6 |
| 2P | 68–119 | 57.1% | 3.6 | 5.9 |
| 3P | 13–54 | 24.1% | 1.6 | 2.7 |
| FT | 41–67 | 61.2% | 2.0 | 3.3 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 50.6% | 53.3% | 31.2% | 38.7% | 1.63 |
Accepted logged appearances only; absent games are not zeroes. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
Nebraska · Power 4 · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $415K
- 80% range $255K to $645K
- Median share of team pool
- 11.7%
- team pool $3.60M, 80% range $2.60M to $4.95M
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $415K in all four
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $27K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 57.8%
- Sufficient evidence
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. House-settlement $20.5M cap (College Sports Commission, 2026-10-01) times a modelled utilisation of about 97 percent times a men's basketball share of about 18 percent (school statements and an industry study); Power 4 schools are at or near the cap nationally.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
Nebraska: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ
Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Nebraska | $415Kspeculative | $255K to $645K | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | +4.5 | +3.1 to +5.7 | Sufficient evidence | -0.1 | +4.6 | +5.2range +4.6 to +5.8 | 2,638 | Season detail | |
| 2025 | Nebraska | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | +1.5 | +0.1 to +3.2 | Sufficient evidence | -0.6 | +2.2 | +2.8range +2.4 to +3.4 | 1,950 | Season detail | |
| 2024 | UCLA | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | -0.7 | -2.1 to +0.7 | Sufficient evidence | -1.3 | +0.6 | +1.2range +0.9 to +1.6 | 1,276 | Season detail |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology
Game log
| Measure | Graphic | Last five | Listed games | Range |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minutes | 26:09 | 24:25 | 18:18–35:11 | |
| Points | 6.8 | 6.5 | 0.0–16.0 | |
| Game eFG% | 52.4% | 51.6% | 0.0%–100.0% |
| Date | Opponent | Result | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF | FG | 3P | FT | eFG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-26 | Iowa | L 71–77 | 27:31 | 2 | 10 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1-7 | 0-4 | 0-0 | 14.3% |
| 2026-03-21 | Vanderbilt | W 74–72 | 27:45 | 12 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 5-6 | 2-2 | 0-1 | 100.0% |
| 2026-03-19 | Troy | W 76–47 | 26:16 | 9 | 7 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 4-7 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 64.3% |
| 2026-03-13 | Purdue | L 58–74 | 20:04 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 1-4 | 33.3% |
| 2026-03-08 | Iowa | W 84–75 | 29:10 | 8 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2-4 | 0-1 | 4-6 | 50.0% |
| 2026-03-03 | UCLA | L 52–72 | 18:49 | 2 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1-3 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 33.3% |
| 2026-02-28 | Southern California | W 82–67 | 24:41 | 9 | 6 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 4-7 | 0-0 | 1-1 | 57.1% |
| 2026-02-25 | Maryland | W 74–61 | 21:55 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 4-7 | 100.0% |
| 2026-02-17 | Iowa | L 52–57 | 20:24 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2-4 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 50.0% |
| 2026-02-14 | Northwestern | W 68–49 | 26:32 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 33.3% |
| 2026-02-10 | Purdue | L 77–80 | 23:42 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2-4 | 0-2 | 1-4 | 50.0% |
| 2026-02-07 | Rutgers | W 80–68 | 18:18 | 4 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 66.7% |
| 2026-02-01 | Illinois | L 69–78 | 24:54 | 3 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 1-4 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 37.5% |
| 2026-01-27 | Michigan | L 72–75 | 35:11 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 2-9 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 27.8% |
| 2026-01-24 | Minnesota | W 76–57 | 27:23 | 8 | 7 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 4-6 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 66.7% |
| 2026-01-21 | Washington | W 76–66 | 27:35 | 8 | 7 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 4-6 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 66.7% |
| 2026-01-17 | Northwestern | W 77–58 | 27:29 | 4 | 5 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 0-2 | 50.0% |
| 2026-01-13 | Oregon | W 90–55 | 22:39 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1-4 | 0-1 | 2-2 | 25.0% |
| 2026-01-10 | Indiana | W 83–77 | 25:17 | 8 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 3-5 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 80.0% |
| 2026-01-05 | Ohio St. | W 72–69 | 21:14 | 8 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 4-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 100.0% |
| 2026-01-02 | Michigan St. | W 58–56 | 23:55 | 0 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0-4 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0.0% |
| 2025-12-30 | New Hampshire | W 86–55 | 21:10 | 14 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 4-7 | 1-2 | 5-5 | 64.3% |
| 2025-12-21 | North Dakota | W 78–55 | 27:04 | 12 | 11 | 10 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 5-7 | 1-3 | 1-2 | 78.6% |
| 2025-12-13 | Illinois | W 83–80 | 26:24 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 1-4 | 0-1 | 1-2 | 25.0% |
| 2025-12-10 | Wisconsin | W 90–60 | 19:13 | 14 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4-5 | 2-2 | 4-4 | 100.0% |
| 2025-12-07 | Creighton | W 71–50 | 29:31 | 6 | 13 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1-6 | 0-2 | 4-8 | 16.7% |
| 2025-11-29 | USC Upstate | W 72–63 | 20:23 | 4 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2-6 | 0-3 | 0-0 | 33.3% |
| 2025-11-21 | Kansas St. | W 86–85 | 21:16 | 5 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 2-9 | 0-5 | 1-2 | 22.2% |
| 2025-11-20 | New Mexico | W 84–72 | 21:10 | 5 | 7 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 2-4 | 0-2 | 1-2 | 50.0% |
| 2025-11-15 | Oklahoma | W 105–99 | 32:04 | 16 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 5-7 | 1-1 | 5-6 | 78.6% |
| 2025-11-11 | UMES | W 69–50 | 24:50 | 8 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2-8 | 0-3 | 4-5 | 25.0% |
| 2025-11-08 | FIU | W 96–66 | 20:07 | 11 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 4-7 | 1-3 | 2-4 | 64.3% |
| 2025-11-03 | West Ga. | W 86–53 | 22:05 | 4 | 7 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2-5 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 40.0% |