Trent Perry
UCLA · 2025–26 · 34 available game logs · Speculative compensation · Model-implied values by season · Linked seasons and observed career performance
Logged performance
1003:41 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 34
- Minutes per game
- 29:31
- Points per game
- 12.5
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 2.9 / 2.9
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 12.5 | 2.9 | 2.9 | 0.9 | 0.1 | 1.4 | 1.7 |
| Per 40 minutes | 16.9 | 4.0 | 3.9 | 1.3 | 0.2 | 1.8 | 2.4 |
| Season totals | 425 | 100 | 97 | 32 | 4 | 46 | 59 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 126–286 | 44.1% | 8.4 | 11.4 |
| 2P | 79–170 | 46.5% | 5.0 | 6.8 |
| 3P | 47–116 | 40.5% | 3.4 | 4.6 |
| FT | 126–145 | 86.9% | 4.3 | 5.8 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 52.3% | 60.7% | 40.6% | 50.7% | 2.11 |
Accepted logged appearances only; absent games are not zeroes. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
UCLA · Power 4 · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $395K
- 80% range $185K to $615K
- Median share of team pool
- 11.7%
- team pool $3.60M, 80% range $2.60M to $4.95M
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $395K in all four
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $27K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 69.9%
- Sufficient evidence
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. House-settlement $20.5M cap (College Sports Commission, 2026-10-01) times a modelled utilisation of about 97 percent times a men's basketball share of about 18 percent (school statements and an industry study); Power 4 schools are at or near the cap nationally.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
UCLA: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ
Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | UCLA | $395Kspeculative | $185K to $615K | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | +2.0 | +0.9 to +3.0 | Sufficient evidence | +2.3 | -0.4 | +5.0range +4.4 to +5.6 | 3,156 | Season detail | |
| 2025 | UCLA | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | +0.5 | -0.6 to +1.7 | Sufficient evidence | -0.1 | +0.6 | +1.3range +1.0 to +1.5 | 1,042 | Season detail |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology
Game log
| Measure | Graphic | Last five | Listed games | Range |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minutes | 32:48 | 29:31 | 9:02–45:00 | |
| Points | 12.4 | 12.5 | 0.0–30.0 | |
| Game eFG% | 42.7% | 52.4% | 0.0%–100.0% |
| Date | Opponent | Result | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF | FG | 3P | FT | eFG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-22 | UConn | L 57–73 | 32:05 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 2-8 | 0-2 | 1-2 | 25.0% |
| 2026-03-14 | Purdue | L 66–73 | 40:00 | 15 | 3 | 9 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 4-12 | 1-4 | 6-6 | 37.5% |
| 2026-03-13 | Michigan St. | W 88–84 | 30:04 | 22 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 6-10 | 4-8 | 6-6 | 80.0% |
| 2026-03-12 | Rutgers | W 72–59 | 33:19 | 12 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 2-8 | 2-5 | 6-7 | 37.5% |
| 2026-03-07 | Southern California | W 89–68 | 28:31 | 8 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2-6 | 0-3 | 4-4 | 33.3% |
| 2026-03-03 | Nebraska | W 72–52 | 38:03 | 20 | 7 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 8-15 | 3-6 | 1-2 | 63.3% |
| 2026-02-28 | Minnesota | L 73–78 | 26:24 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0-7 | 0-5 | 0-0 | 0.0% |
| 2026-02-24 | Southern California | W 81–62 | 33:57 | 13 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 6-9 | 0-0 | 1-1 | 66.7% |
| 2026-02-21 | Illinois | W 95–94 | 45:00 | 17 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 4-9 | 2-4 | 7-7 | 55.6% |
| 2026-02-17 | Michigan St. | L 59–82 | 25:15 | 9 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 2-7 | 1-3 | 4-4 | 35.7% |
| 2026-02-14 | Michigan | L 56–86 | 32:50 | 14 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 5-9 | 1-2 | 3-4 | 61.1% |
| 2026-02-07 | Washington | W 77–73 | 36:33 | 23 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 5-9 | 3-3 | 10-11 | 72.2% |
| 2026-02-03 | Rutgers | W 98–66 | 31:08 | 10 | 7 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4-6 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 83.3% |
| 2026-01-31 | Indiana | L 97–98 | 42:48 | 25 | 7 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 6-16 | 3-6 | 10-10 | 46.9% |
| 2026-01-28 | Oregon | W 73–57 | 34:58 | 12 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3-10 | 2-5 | 4-4 | 40.0% |
| 2026-01-24 | Northwestern | W 71–64 | 34:46 | 18 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 6-12 | 0-4 | 6-7 | 50.0% |
| 2026-01-20 | Purdue | W 69–67 | 37:41 | 11 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 4-7 | 3-5 | 0-0 | 78.6% |
| 2026-01-17 | Ohio St. | L 74–86 | 38:32 | 7 | 4 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2-9 | 1-2 | 2-2 | 27.8% |
| 2026-01-14 | Penn St. | W 71–60 | 38:04 | 30 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 7-13 | 4-8 | 12-12 | 69.2% |
| 2026-01-10 | Maryland | W 67–55 | 34:55 | 16 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 5-10 | 2-5 | 4-6 | 60.0% |
| 2026-01-06 | Wisconsin | L 72–80 | 31:04 | 15 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 4-12 | 1-3 | 6-6 | 37.5% |
| 2026-01-03 | Iowa | L 61–74 | 23:08 | 7 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 2-9 | 1-3 | 2-2 | 27.8% |
| 2025-12-23 | UC Riverside | W 97–65 | 24:13 | 14 | 3 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3-6 | 1-1 | 7-8 | 58.3% |
| 2025-12-19 | Cal Poly | W 108–87 | 19:40 | 12 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 3-7 | 2-5 | 4-4 | 57.1% |
| 2025-12-17 | Arizona St. | W 90–77 | 13:24 | 8 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 3-5 | 1-2 | 1-3 | 70.0% |
| 2025-12-13 | Gonzaga | L 72–82 | 12:42 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0-2 | 0-1 | 3-4 | 0.0% |
| 2025-12-06 | Oregon | W 74–63 | 9:02 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 50.0% |
| 2025-11-25 | California | L 72–80 | 24:09 | 17 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 5-9 | 1-2 | 6-9 | 61.1% |
| 2025-11-21 | Presbyterian | W 86–46 | 24:13 | 9 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 3-6 | 1-1 | 2-2 | 58.3% |
| 2025-11-18 | Sacramento St. | W 79–48 | 26:33 | 11 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 4-7 | 2-3 | 1-1 | 71.4% |
| 2025-11-14 | Arizona | L 65–69 | 17:39 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 1-2 | 100.0% |
| 2025-11-10 | West Ga. | W 83–62 | 37:13 | 17 | 5 | 9 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 5-11 | 2-5 | 5-6 | 54.5% |
| 2025-11-07 | Pepperdine | W 74–63 | 20:40 | 9 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 4-9 | 0-4 | 1-2 | 44.4% |
| 2025-11-03 | Eastern Wash. | W 80–74 | 25:08 | 11 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 5-8 | 1-4 | 0-1 | 68.8% |