Eric Dailey Jr.
UCLA · 2025–26 · 34 available game logs · Speculative compensation · Model-implied values by season · Linked seasons and observed career performance
Logged performance
913:01 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 34
- Minutes per game
- 26:51
- Points per game
- 11.4
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 5.8 / 1.3
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 11.4 | 5.8 | 1.3 | 0.9 | 0.2 | 1.4 | 2.1 |
| Per 40 minutes | 16.9 | 8.6 | 2.0 | 1.3 | 0.3 | 2.1 | 3.2 |
| Season totals | 386 | 197 | 45 | 29 | 7 | 47 | 72 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 147–302 | 48.7% | 8.9 | 13.2 |
| 2P | 118–210 | 56.2% | 6.2 | 9.2 |
| 3P | 29–92 | 31.5% | 2.7 | 4.0 |
| FT | 63–91 | 69.2% | 2.7 | 4.0 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 53.5% | 56.4% | 30.5% | 30.1% | 0.96 |
Accepted logged appearances only; absent games are not zeroes. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
UCLA · Power 4 · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $430K
- 80% range $185K to $730K
- Median share of team pool
- 12.3%
- team pool $3.60M, 80% range $2.60M to $4.95M
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $430K in all four
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $27K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 65.5%
- Sufficient evidence
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. House-settlement $20.5M cap (College Sports Commission, 2026-10-01) times a modelled utilisation of about 97 percent times a men's basketball share of about 18 percent (school statements and an industry study); Power 4 schools are at or near the cap nationally.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
UCLA: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ
Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | UCLA | $430Kspeculative | $185K to $730K | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | +2.4 | +0.4 to +4.1 | Sufficient evidence | +2.3 | +0.1 | +4.9range +4.0 to +5.7 | 2,954 | Season detail | |
| 2025 | UCLA | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | +4.2 | +2.8 to +5.5 | Sufficient evidence | +2.2 | +2.0 | +4.4range +3.7 to +5.1 | 2,393 | Season detail | |
| 2024 | Oklahoma St | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | +1.8 | +0.7 to +2.9 | Sufficient evidence | +1.0 | +0.8 | +2.4range +2.0 to +2.8 | 2,075 | Season detail |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology
Game log
| Measure | Graphic | Last five | Listed games | Range |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minutes | 28:14 | 26:51 | 14:22–35:31 | |
| Points | 13.2 | 11.4 | 0.0–20.0 | |
| Game eFG% | 56.4% | 52.1% | 0.0%–116.7% |
| Date | Opponent | Result | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF | FG | 3P | FT | eFG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-22 | UConn | L 57–73 | 25:29 | 12 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 5-12 | 1-2 | 1-3 | 45.8% |
| 2026-03-14 | Purdue | L 66–73 | 33:26 | 11 | 10 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 5-12 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 45.8% |
| 2026-03-13 | Michigan St. | W 88–84 | 34:17 | 14 | 10 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 5-7 | 2-3 | 2-4 | 85.7% |
| 2026-03-12 | Rutgers | W 72–59 | 25:19 | 10 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3-7 | 0-1 | 4-6 | 42.9% |
| 2026-03-07 | Southern California | W 89–68 | 22:39 | 19 | 8 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 7-13 | 2-4 | 3-5 | 61.5% |
| 2026-03-03 | Nebraska | W 72–52 | 30:51 | 14 | 8 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 6-9 | 1-3 | 1-2 | 72.2% |
| 2026-02-28 | Minnesota | L 73–78 | 31:21 | 18 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 8-10 | 1-1 | 1-1 | 85.0% |
| 2026-02-24 | Southern California | W 81–62 | 18:35 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0-4 | 0-3 | 1-2 | 0.0% |
| 2026-02-21 | Illinois | W 95–94 | 28:37 | 20 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 8-13 | 3-6 | 1-2 | 73.1% |
| 2026-02-17 | Michigan St. | L 59–82 | 20:10 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1-2 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 75.0% |
| 2026-02-14 | Michigan | L 56–86 | 14:39 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1-5 | 0-0 | 1-2 | 20.0% |
| 2026-02-07 | Washington | W 77–73 | 30:00 | 14 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 5-12 | 2-4 | 2-2 | 50.0% |
| 2026-02-03 | Rutgers | W 98–66 | 29:21 | 17 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 5-10 | 0-2 | 7-8 | 50.0% |
| 2026-01-31 | Indiana | L 97–98 | 35:31 | 15 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 6-11 | 0-1 | 3-3 | 54.5% |
| 2026-01-28 | Oregon | W 73–57 | 33:33 | 14 | 11 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 5-13 | 1-2 | 3-3 | 42.3% |
| 2026-01-24 | Northwestern | W 71–64 | 29:57 | 11 | 8 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 4-10 | 1-3 | 2-4 | 45.0% |
| 2026-01-20 | Purdue | W 69–67 | 34:15 | 12 | 7 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 6-11 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 54.5% |
| 2026-01-17 | Ohio St. | L 74–86 | 19:05 | 12 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 6-12 | 0-3 | 0-3 | 50.0% |
| 2026-01-14 | Penn St. | W 71–60 | 14:22 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0-3 | 0-3 | 2-2 | 0.0% |
| 2026-01-10 | Maryland | W 67–55 | 24:43 | 15 | 9 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5-14 | 1-4 | 4-4 | 39.3% |
| 2026-01-06 | Wisconsin | L 72–80 | 30:51 | 18 | 8 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 5 | 9-17 | 0-5 | 0-1 | 52.9% |
| 2026-01-03 | Iowa | L 61–74 | 29:57 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2-5 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 40.0% |
| 2025-12-23 | UC Riverside | W 97–65 | 21:59 | 13 | 9 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 5-7 | 0-1 | 3-3 | 71.4% |
| 2025-12-19 | Cal Poly | W 108–87 | 33:33 | 10 | 6 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3-6 | 0-3 | 4-4 | 50.0% |
| 2025-12-17 | Arizona St. | W 90–77 | 20:00 | 4 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0-6 | 0-2 | 4-4 | 0.0% |
| 2025-12-13 | Gonzaga | L 72–82 | 34:07 | 6 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 3-8 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 37.5% |
| 2025-12-06 | Oregon | W 74–63 | 29:45 | 18 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 6-9 | 2-4 | 4-4 | 77.8% |
| 2025-12-03 | Washington | W 82–80 | 15:43 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0-3 | 0-1 | 0-2 | 0.0% |
| 2025-11-25 | California | L 72–80 | 34:34 | 17 | 7 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 7-15 | 3-7 | 0-1 | 56.7% |
| 2025-11-21 | Presbyterian | W 86–46 | 17:23 | 7 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 3-3 | 1-1 | 0-2 | 116.7% |
| 2025-11-18 | Sacramento St. | W 79–48 | 29:51 | 15 | 10 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 5-10 | 0-4 | 5-6 | 50.0% |
| 2025-11-14 | Arizona | L 65–69 | 32:19 | 13 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 5-10 | 3-5 | 0-0 | 65.0% |
| 2025-11-10 | West Ga. | W 83–62 | 21:27 | 14 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 5-9 | 1-2 | 3-4 | 61.1% |
| 2025-11-07 | Pepperdine | W 74–63 | 25:22 | 10 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3-4 | 2-3 | 2-3 | 100.0% |