Brandon Williams
UCLA · 2025–26 · 33 available game logs · Speculative compensation · Model-implied values by season · Linked seasons and observed career performance
Logged performance
404:14 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 33
- Minutes per game
- 12:15
- Points per game
- 2.7
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 1.8 / 0.3
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 2.7 | 1.8 | 0.3 | 0.4 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 1.3 |
| Per 40 minutes | 8.9 | 5.9 | 1.1 | 1.4 | 0.7 | 0.8 | 4.2 |
| Season totals | 90 | 60 | 11 | 14 | 7 | 8 | 42 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 32–76 | 42.1%† | 2.3 | 7.5 |
| 2P | 26–51 | 51.0%† | 1.5 | 5.0 |
| 3P | 6–25 | 24.0%† | 0.8 | 2.5 |
| FT | 20–31 | 64.5% | 0.9 | 3.1 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 46.1%† | 50.2%† | 32.9%† | 40.8%† | 1.38 |
Accepted logged appearances only; absent games are not zeroes. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25); the field-goal floor applies to the derived rates above. Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
UCLA · Power 4 · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $145K
- 80% range $42K to $250K
- Median share of team pool
- 4.3%
- team pool $3.60M, 80% range $2.60M to $4.95M
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $145K in all four
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $27K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 29.0%
- Sufficient evidence
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. House-settlement $20.5M cap (College Sports Commission, 2026-10-01) times a modelled utilisation of about 97 percent times a men's basketball share of about 18 percent (school statements and an industry study); Power 4 schools are at or near the cap nationally.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
UCLA: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ
Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | UCLA | $145Kspeculative | $42K to $250K | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | +1.1 | -0.5 to +2.5 | Sufficient evidence | +0.3 | +0.8 | +1.9range +1.6 to +2.2 | 1,310 | Season detail | |
| 2024 | UCLA | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | -1.5 | -2.8 to -0.3 | Sufficient evidence | -1.2 | -0.3 | +1.4range +1.0 to +1.8 | 1,728 | Season detail |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology
Game log
| Measure | Graphic | Last five | Listed games | Range |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minutes | 15:10 | 12:15 | 1:28–25:03 | |
| Points | 4.6 | 2.7 | 0.0–11.0 | |
| Game eFG% | 56.7% | 44.7% | 0.0%–150.0% |
| Date | Opponent | Result | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF | FG | 3P | FT | eFG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-22 | UConn | L 57–73 | 10:41 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 3-4 | 0.0% |
| 2026-03-14 | Purdue | L 66–73 | 20:09 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 1-2 | 0-1 | 1-2 | 50.0% |
| 2026-03-13 | Michigan St. | W 88–84 | 19:09 | 9 | 4 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3-4 | 0-0 | 3-4 | 75.0% |
| 2026-03-12 | Rutgers | W 72–59 | 9:15 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 33.3% |
| 2026-03-07 | Southern California | W 89–68 | 16:38 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2-2 | 1-1 | 1-2 | 125.0% |
| 2026-03-03 | Nebraska | W 72–52 | 11:31 | 6 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 2-2 | 100.0% |
| 2026-02-24 | Southern California | W 81–62 | 4:28 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 100.0% |
| 2026-02-21 | Illinois | W 95–94 | 1:28 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | — |
| 2026-02-17 | Michigan St. | L 59–82 | 13:07 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 0-2 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0.0% |
| 2026-02-14 | Michigan | L 56–86 | 7:28 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0.0% |
| 2026-02-07 | Washington | W 77–73 | 17:24 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 1-2 | — |
| 2026-02-03 | Rutgers | W 98–66 | 14:54 | 5 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1-5 | 0-1 | 3-3 | 20.0% |
| 2026-01-31 | Indiana | L 97–98 | 16:12 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1-1 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 150.0% |
| 2026-01-28 | Oregon | W 73–57 | 16:09 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1-2 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 50.0% |
| 2026-01-24 | Northwestern | W 71–64 | 5:49 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0.0% |
| 2026-01-20 | Purdue | W 69–67 | 4:32 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0.0% |
| 2026-01-17 | Ohio St. | L 74–86 | 8:13 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 100.0% |
| 2026-01-14 | Penn St. | W 71–60 | 9:21 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1-3 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 33.3% |
| 2026-01-06 | Wisconsin | L 72–80 | 17:33 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2-4 | 0-2 | 2-2 | 50.0% |
| 2026-01-03 | Iowa | L 61–74 | 17:34 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 50.0% |
| 2025-12-23 | UC Riverside | W 97–65 | 18:34 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 1-3 | 1-1 | 0-2 | 50.0% |
| 2025-12-19 | Cal Poly | W 108–87 | 15:33 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1-2 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 50.0% |
| 2025-12-17 | Arizona St. | W 90–77 | 20:26 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2-3 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 83.3% |
| 2025-12-13 | Gonzaga | L 72–82 | 5:22 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 66.7% |
| 2025-12-06 | Oregon | W 74–63 | 6:13 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | — |
| 2025-12-03 | Washington | W 82–80 | 10:48 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0.0% |
| 2025-11-25 | California | L 72–80 | 11:37 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3-5 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 60.0% |
| 2025-11-21 | Presbyterian | W 86–46 | 25:03 | 11 | 7 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 4-7 | 1-2 | 2-2 | 64.3% |
| 2025-11-18 | Sacramento St. | W 79–48 | 18:02 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1-5 | 1-2 | 2-5 | 30.0% |
| 2025-11-14 | Arizona | L 65–69 | 7:28 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0-3 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0.0% |
| 2025-11-10 | West Ga. | W 83–62 | 8:05 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0-3 | 0-3 | 0-0 | 0.0% |
| 2025-11-07 | Pepperdine | W 74–63 | 7:21 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-2 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0.0% |
| 2025-11-03 | Eastern Wash. | W 80–74 | 8:07 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0.0% |