Tounde Yessoufou
Baylor · 2025–26 · 32 available game logs · Speculative compensation · Model-implied values by season · Linked seasons and observed career performance
Logged performance
1043:35 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 32
- Minutes per game
- 32:37
- Points per game
- 17.6
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 5.8 / 1.5
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 17.6 | 5.8 | 1.5 | 1.9 | 0.6 | 1.9 | 2.3 |
| Per 40 minutes | 21.6 | 7.1 | 1.8 | 2.3 | 0.7 | 2.4 | 2.8 |
| Season totals | 563 | 186 | 47 | 60 | 19 | 62 | 74 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 208–455 | 45.7% | 14.2 | 17.4 |
| 2P | 155–283 | 54.8% | 8.8 | 10.8 |
| 3P | 53–172 | 30.8% | 5.4 | 6.6 |
| FT | 94–126 | 74.6% | 3.9 | 4.8 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 51.5% | 55.1% | 37.8% | 27.7% | 0.76 |
Accepted logged appearances only; absent games are not zeroes. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
Baylor · Power 4 · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $460K
- 80% range $135K to $745K
- Median share of team pool
- 13.6%
- team pool $3.60M, 80% range $2.60M to $4.95M
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $460K in all four
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $29K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 82.0%
- Sufficient evidence
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. House-settlement $20.5M cap (College Sports Commission, 2026-10-01) times a modelled utilisation of about 97 percent times a men's basketball share of about 18 percent (school statements and an industry study); Power 4 schools are at or near the cap nationally.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
Baylor: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ
Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Baylor | $460Kspeculative | $135K to $745K | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | +1.5 | +0.0 to +3.0 | Sufficient evidence | +1.5 | +0.0 | +5.6range +4.7 to +6.5 | 3,399 | Season detail |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology
Game log
| Measure | Graphic | Last five | Listed games | Range |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minutes | 34:51 | 32:37 | 21:56–40:00 | |
| Points | 17.8 | 17.6 | 9.0–37.0 | |
| Game eFG% | 48.8% | 51.1% | 31.8%–76.3% |
| Date | Opponent | Result | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF | FG | 3P | FT | eFG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-04-04 | Oklahoma | L 69–82 | 37:47 | 15 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 5-12 | 1-5 | 4-5 | 45.8% |
| 2026-04-01 | Minnesota | W 67–48 | 35:12 | 19 | 7 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 8-20 | 0-4 | 3-4 | 40.0% |
| 2026-03-07 | Utah | W 101–75 | 31:15 | 26 | 5 | 4 | 6 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 10-16 | 2-5 | 4-5 | 68.8% |
| 2026-03-04 | Houston | L 64–77 | 37:51 | 20 | 12 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 7-13 | 1-5 | 5-6 | 57.7% |
| 2026-02-28 | UCF | W 87–86 | 32:09 | 9 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3-11 | 1-4 | 2-2 | 31.8% |
| 2026-02-24 | Arizona | L 80–87 | 33:11 | 12 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 5-15 | 2-5 | 0-2 | 40.0% |
| 2026-02-21 | Arizona St. | W 73–68 | 35:28 | 16 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 6-14 | 2-7 | 2-7 | 50.0% |
| 2026-02-17 | Kansas St. | L 74–90 | 37:00 | 14 | 7 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 6-14 | 1-4 | 1-1 | 46.4% |
| 2026-02-14 | Louisville | L 71–82 | 35:20 | 16 | 4 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 5-16 | 1-7 | 5-6 | 34.4% |
| 2026-02-10 | BYU | L 94–99 | 40:00 | 37 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 12-19 | 5-8 | 8-8 | 76.3% |
| 2026-02-07 | Iowa St. | L 69–72 | 39:59 | 17 | 3 | 1 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 6-16 | 2-8 | 3-4 | 43.8% |
| 2026-02-04 | Colorado | W 86–67 | 37:44 | 27 | 7 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 10-16 | 4-7 | 3-4 | 75.0% |
| 2026-01-31 | West Virginia | W 63–53 | 32:12 | 11 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 5-16 | 1-5 | 0-0 | 34.4% |
| 2026-01-28 | Cincinnati | L 57–67 | 35:38 | 16 | 7 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 6-14 | 2-6 | 2-3 | 50.0% |
| 2026-01-24 | TCU | L 90–97 | 26:01 | 21 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 5 | 7-10 | 1-2 | 6-9 | 75.0% |
| 2026-01-20 | Texas Tech | L 73–92 | 34:00 | 9 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4-14 | 1-7 | 0-0 | 32.1% |
| 2026-01-16 | Kansas | L 62–80 | 37:05 | 20 | 7 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 7-17 | 3-8 | 3-4 | 50.0% |
| 2026-01-13 | Oklahoma St. | W 94–79 | 30:33 | 23 | 5 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 11-17 | 1-4 | 0-1 | 67.6% |
| 2026-01-10 | Houston | L 55–77 | 27:15 | 11 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 3 | 3-6 | 1-3 | 4-4 | 58.3% |
| 2026-01-07 | Iowa St. | L 60–70 | 31:40 | 10 | 8 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 4-13 | 1-5 | 1-3 | 34.6% |
| 2026-01-03 | TCU | L 63–69 | 31:40 | 10 | 5 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 4-12 | 2-7 | 0-0 | 41.7% |
| 2025-12-21 | Southern U. | W 111–67 | 28:39 | 28 | 8 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 8-14 | 3-6 | 9-10 | 67.9% |
| 2025-12-19 | Alcorn | W 113–56 | 25:45 | 17 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 7-13 | 1-5 | 2-2 | 57.7% |
| 2025-12-10 | Norfolk St. | W 97–67 | 27:56 | 17 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 7-16 | 1-3 | 2-2 | 46.9% |
| 2025-12-06 | Memphis | L 71–78 | 34:12 | 22 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 8-15 | 4-8 | 2-4 | 66.7% |
| 2025-12-02 | Sacramento St. | W 110–88 | 28:30 | 27 | 6 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 11-15 | 0-1 | 5-6 | 73.3% |
| 2025-11-26 | San Diego St. | W 91–81 | 30:57 | 18 | 7 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 7-14 | 1-5 | 3-5 | 53.6% |
| 2025-11-25 | St. John's (NY) | L 81–96 | 31:52 | 15 | 9 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 5-17 | 3-9 | 2-2 | 38.2% |
| 2025-11-24 | Creighton | W 81–74 | 32:33 | 11 | 5 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 4-12 | 2-4 | 1-3 | 41.7% |
| 2025-11-14 | Tarleton St. | W 94–81 | 21:56 | 12 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 3-9 | 0-4 | 6-6 | 33.3% |
| 2025-11-09 | Washington | W 78–69 | 32:07 | 13 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 4-13 | 1-6 | 4-5 | 34.6% |
| 2025-11-03 | UTRGV | W 96–81 | 30:08 | 24 | 7 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 10-16 | 2-5 | 2-3 | 68.8% |