Cameron Carr
Baylor · 2025–26 · 32 available game logs · Speculative compensation · Model-implied values by season · Linked seasons and observed career performance
Logged performance
1081:35 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 32
- Minutes per game
- 33:48
- Points per game
- 18.8
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 5.8 / 2.5
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 18.8 | 5.8 | 2.5 | 0.9 | 1.3 | 2.3 | 1.9 |
| Per 40 minutes | 22.2 | 6.8 | 2.9 | 1.0 | 1.6 | 2.7 | 2.2 |
| Season totals | 600 | 184 | 79 | 28 | 43 | 74 | 60 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 202–411 | 49.1% | 12.8 | 15.2 |
| 2P | 130–220 | 59.1% | 6.9 | 8.1 |
| 3P | 72–191 | 37.7% | 6.0 | 7.1 |
| FT | 124–155 | 80.0% | 4.8 | 5.7 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 57.9% | 62.6% | 46.5% | 37.7% | 1.07 |
Accepted logged appearances only; absent games are not zeroes. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
Baylor · Power 4 · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $925K
- 80% range $575K to $1.65M
- Median share of team pool
- 24.9%
- team pool $3.60M, 80% range $2.60M to $4.95M
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $925K in all four
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $29K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 84.6%
- Sufficient evidence
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. House-settlement $20.5M cap (College Sports Commission, 2026-10-01) times a modelled utilisation of about 97 percent times a men's basketball share of about 18 percent (school statements and an industry study); Power 4 schools are at or near the cap nationally.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
Baylor: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ
Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Baylor | $925Kspeculative | $575K to $1.65M | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | +4.3 | +2.6 to +5.9 | Sufficient evidence | +3.0 | +1.3 | +7.1range +6.3 to +7.9 | 3,504 | Season detail |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology
Game log
| Measure | Graphic | Last five | Listed games | Range |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minutes | 36:09 | 33:48 | 23:07–39:59 | |
| Points | 17.4 | 18.8 | 4.0–28.0 | |
| Game eFG% | 65.2% | 59.7% | 9.1%–112.5% |
| Date | Opponent | Result | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF | FG | 3P | FT | eFG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-04-04 | Oklahoma | L 69–82 | 37:13 | 14 | 12 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 4-18 | 2-11 | 4-6 | 27.8% |
| 2026-04-01 | Minnesota | W 67–48 | 37:06 | 15 | 9 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 6-15 | 1-7 | 2-2 | 43.3% |
| 2026-03-07 | Utah | W 101–75 | 33:08 | 21 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 9-13 | 3-5 | 0-0 | 80.8% |
| 2026-03-04 | Houston | L 64–77 | 35:47 | 11 | 7 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 3-4 | 3-4 | 2-2 | 112.5% |
| 2026-02-28 | UCF | W 87–86 | 37:29 | 26 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 6-13 | 4-8 | 10-10 | 61.5% |
| 2026-02-24 | Arizona | L 80–87 | 36:43 | 26 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 11-19 | 2-7 | 2-3 | 63.2% |
| 2026-02-21 | Arizona St. | W 73–68 | 33:51 | 13 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 5-10 | 1-5 | 2-2 | 55.0% |
| 2026-02-17 | Kansas St. | L 74–90 | 35:30 | 12 | 5 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 7 | 4 | 5-12 | 0-5 | 2-2 | 41.7% |
| 2026-02-14 | Louisville | L 71–82 | 34:39 | 5 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 1 | 1-11 | 1-7 | 2-2 | 13.6% |
| 2026-02-10 | BYU | L 94–99 | 35:07 | 24 | 8 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 9-15 | 3-7 | 3-3 | 70.0% |
| 2026-02-07 | Iowa St. | L 69–72 | 39:59 | 24 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 8-15 | 5-10 | 3-4 | 70.0% |
| 2026-02-04 | Colorado | W 86–67 | 35:34 | 19 | 8 | 6 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 6-12 | 3-6 | 4-5 | 62.5% |
| 2026-01-31 | West Virginia | W 63–53 | 37:02 | 16 | 12 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 7 | 2 | 6-11 | 2-5 | 2-3 | 63.6% |
| 2026-01-28 | Cincinnati | L 57–67 | 32:54 | 4 | 7 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 1-11 | 0-4 | 2-2 | 9.1% |
| 2026-01-24 | TCU | L 90–97 | 35:54 | 20 | 6 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 7-13 | 0-3 | 6-7 | 53.8% |
| 2026-01-20 | Texas Tech | L 73–92 | 36:36 | 18 | 9 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 7-12 | 1-4 | 3-4 | 62.5% |
| 2026-01-16 | Kansas | L 62–80 | 30:39 | 24 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 8-17 | 5-8 | 3-4 | 61.8% |
| 2026-01-13 | Oklahoma St. | W 94–79 | 26:33 | 17 | 2 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 6-12 | 5-8 | 0-0 | 70.8% |
| 2026-01-10 | Houston | L 55–77 | 33:51 | 18 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 3-9 | 3-6 | 9-16 | 50.0% |
| 2026-01-07 | Iowa St. | L 60–70 | 33:07 | 17 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 5-13 | 2-6 | 5-7 | 46.2% |
| 2026-01-03 | TCU | L 63–69 | 35:36 | 17 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 6-12 | 1-5 | 4-5 | 54.2% |
| 2025-12-21 | Southern U. | W 111–67 | 33:29 | 22 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 7-17 | 3-10 | 5-6 | 50.0% |
| 2025-12-19 | Alcorn | W 113–56 | 25:19 | 24 | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 8-9 | 2-3 | 6-6 | 100.0% |
| 2025-12-10 | Norfolk St. | W 97–67 | 29:13 | 19 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 9-11 | 0-2 | 1-1 | 81.8% |
| 2025-12-06 | Memphis | L 71–78 | 31:20 | 13 | 10 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 3-15 | 2-9 | 5-5 | 26.7% |
| 2025-12-02 | Sacramento St. | W 110–88 | 30:19 | 25 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 10-16 | 2-7 | 3-5 | 68.8% |
| 2025-11-26 | San Diego St. | W 91–81 | 35:30 | 17 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 5-11 | 2-4 | 5-6 | 54.5% |
| 2025-11-25 | St. John's (NY) | L 81–96 | 35:40 | 27 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 8-15 | 5-8 | 6-7 | 70.0% |
| 2025-11-24 | Creighton | W 81–74 | 34:03 | 21 | 9 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 7-16 | 0-0 | 7-8 | 43.8% |
| 2025-11-14 | Tarleton St. | W 94–81 | 34:57 | 27 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 10-13 | 3-6 | 4-5 | 88.5% |
| 2025-11-09 | Washington | W 78–69 | 23:07 | 16 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 4-7 | 3-5 | 5-8 | 78.6% |
| 2025-11-03 | UTRGV | W 96–81 | 34:20 | 28 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 9-14 | 3-6 | 7-9 | 75.0% |