Jayden Hastings
Boston College · 2025–26 · 31 available game logs · Speculative compensation · Model-implied values by season · Linked seasons and observed career performance
Logged performance
708:54 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 31
- Minutes per game
- 22:52
- Points per game
- 6.7
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 5.6 / 0.7
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 6.7 | 5.6 | 0.7 | 0.6 | 1.5 | 1.0 | 3.3 |
| Per 40 minutes | 11.7 | 9.9 | 1.3 | 1.0 | 2.7 | 1.8 | 5.8 |
| Season totals | 207 | 175 | 23 | 18 | 47 | 32 | 102 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 80–131 | 61.1% | 4.2 | 7.4 |
| 2P | 80–128 | 62.5% | 4.1 | 7.2 |
| 3P | 0–3 | 0.0%† | 0.1 | 0.2 |
| FT | 47–94 | 50.0% | 3.0 | 5.3 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 61.1% | 60.0% | 2.3% | 71.8% | 0.72 |
Accepted logged appearances only; absent games are not zeroes. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
Boston College · Power 4 · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $830K
- 80% range $440K to $2.20M
- Median share of team pool
- 22.2%
- team pool $3.55M, 80% range $2.60M to $4.95M
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $830K in all four
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $27K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 56.3%
- Sufficient evidence
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. House-settlement $20.5M cap (College Sports Commission, 2026-10-01) times a modelled utilisation of about 97 percent times a men's basketball share of about 18 percent (school statements and an industry study); Power 4 schools are at or near the cap nationally.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
Boston College: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ
Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Boston College | $830Kspeculative | $440K to $2.20M | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | +3.0 | +1.9 to +4.2 | Sufficient evidence | +0.2 | +2.8 | +4.0range +3.6 to +4.4 | 2,124 | Season detail | |
| 2025 | Boston College | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | +0.1 | -1.1 to +1.3 | Sufficient evidence | -0.8 | +0.8 | +1.5range +1.2 to +1.8 | 1,196 | Season detail |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology
Game log
| Measure | Graphic | Last five | Listed games | Range |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minutes | 23:54 | 22:52 | 10:37–39:00 | |
| Points | 8.0 | 6.7 | 0.0–12.0 | |
| Game eFG% | 70.0% | 58.3% | 0.0%–100.0% |
| Date | Opponent | Result | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF | FG | 3P | FT | eFG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-07 | Notre Dame | W 77–69 | 21:57 | 12 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2-3 | 0-0 | 8-9 | 66.7% |
| 2026-03-03 | Virginia Tech | L 63–72 | 24:46 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 2-4 | 50.0% |
| 2026-02-28 | Miami (FL) | L 54–76 | 30:28 | 11 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 5-6 | 0-1 | 1-4 | 83.3% |
| 2026-02-25 | Wake Forest | W 68–67 | 15:37 | 4 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 100.0% |
| 2026-02-21 | SMU | L 70–94 | 26:42 | 7 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 3-6 | 50.0% |
| 2026-02-17 | Florida St. | L 72–80 | 23:36 | 2 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 0-4 | 33.3% |
| 2026-02-14 | California | L 75–86 | 32:52 | 12 | 8 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 5-9 | 0-0 | 2-6 | 55.6% |
| 2026-02-11 | Stanford | L 64–70 | 19:20 | 10 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 5 | 4-7 | 0-0 | 2-3 | 57.1% |
| 2026-02-07 | Miami (FL) | L 68–74 | 22:39 | 7 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 4 | 3-5 | 0-0 | 1-1 | 60.0% |
| 2026-02-03 | Duke | L 49–67 | 33:22 | 4 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 1-7 | 0-1 | 2-4 | 14.3% |
| 2026-01-31 | Virginia | L 66–73 | 19:02 | 12 | 6 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 5-6 | 0-0 | 2-5 | 83.3% |
| 2026-01-24 | Notre Dame | L 64–68 | 24:04 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 4 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 1-3 | 0.0% |
| 2026-01-21 | Pittsburgh | W 65–62 | 11:26 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0.0% |
| 2026-01-17 | Syracuse | W 81–73 | 39:00 | 10 | 13 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 4-4 | 0-0 | 2-5 | 100.0% |
| 2026-01-13 | Clemson | L 50–74 | 27:38 | 9 | 7 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 1 | 5 | 4-5 | 0-0 | 1-4 | 80.0% |
| 2026-01-10 | Louisville | L 62–75 | 14:11 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 50.0% |
| 2026-01-06 | NC State | L 71–79 | 26:17 | 7 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 3-3 | 0-0 | 1-2 | 100.0% |
| 2026-01-03 | Georgia Tech | L 53–65 | 18:28 | 9 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 4-7 | 0-0 | 1-3 | 57.1% |
| 2025-12-28 | Le Moyne | W 72–64 | 27:43 | 8 | 6 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 4 | 4-7 | 0-0 | 0-2 | 57.1% |
| 2025-12-22 | FDU | W 72–61 | 16:58 | 4 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2-4 | 0-1 | 0-3 | 50.0% |
| 2025-12-10 | Massachusetts | L 74–76 | 22:32 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0.0% |
| 2025-12-06 | New Haven | W 67–63 | 28:04 | 7 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 5-6 | 50.0% |
| 2025-12-03 | LSU | L 69–78 | 31:14 | 9 | 10 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 4-6 | 0-0 | 1-2 | 66.7% |
| 2025-11-26 | Harvard | W 73–60 | 14:53 | 10 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3-6 | 0-0 | 4-4 | 50.0% |
| 2025-11-23 | Tulane | L 90–93 | 22:48 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 2-4 | 50.0% |
| 2025-11-21 | Davidson | L 49–59 | 24:49 | 11 | 10 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 5-6 | 0-0 | 1-2 | 83.3% |
| 2025-11-18 | Hampton | W 63–52 | 16:03 | 4 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 66.7% |
| 2025-11-15 | Temple | W 76–71 | 10:37 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 50.0% |
| 2025-11-11 | Central Conn. St. | L 59–60 | 22:56 | 8 | 8 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 3-4 | 0-0 | 2-2 | 75.0% |
| 2025-11-06 | The Citadel | W 76–47 | 18:28 | 6 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 2-3 | 0-0 | 2-3 | 66.7% |
| 2025-11-03 | Fla. Atlantic | L 78–83 | 20:24 | 7 | 6 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 3-3 | 0-0 | 1-2 | 100.0% |