Keon Thompson
SFA · 2025–26 · 32 available game logs · Speculative compensation · Model-implied values by season · Linked seasons and observed career performance
Logged performance
968:29 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 32
- Minutes per game
- 30:16
- Points per game
- 18.6
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 4.8 / 4.4
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 18.6 | 4.8 | 4.4 | 1.1 | 0.1 | 2.8 | 2.5 |
| Per 40 minutes | 24.6 | 6.4 | 5.8 | 1.5 | 0.2 | 3.6 | 3.3 |
| Season totals | 595 | 154 | 141 | 36 | 4 | 88 | 81 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 217–438 | 49.5% | 13.7 | 18.1 |
| 2P | 192–358 | 53.6% | 11.2 | 14.8 |
| 3P | 25–80 | 31.3% | 2.5 | 3.3 |
| FT | 136–196 | 69.4% | 6.1 | 8.1 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 52.4% | 56.7% | 18.3% | 44.7% | 1.60 |
Accepted logged appearances only; absent games are not zeroes. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
SF Austin · Low and other · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $28K
- 80% range $9K to $83K
- Median share of team pool
- 13.5%
- team pool $230K, 80% range $85K to $625K
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $27K to $29K
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $2K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 76.3%
- Sufficient evidence
- Range driven by assumption, not data
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. Tier prior from anonymous surveys and sources, scaled so that all non-Power budgets sum to the national total the College Sports Commission reported paid for 2025-26 ($1,770,453,776 over 307 schools) less the Power 4 total, times a men's basketball share; weak anchor.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
SF Austin: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ
Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | SF Austin | $28Kspeculative | $9K to $83K | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | +1.7 | +1.0 to +2.5 | Sufficient evidence | +1.8 | -0.1 | +5.6range +5.1 to +6.2 | 2,530 | Season detail | |
| 2025 | SF Austin | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | -1.6 | -2.7 to -0.5 | Sufficient evidence | -0.5 | -1.1 | +1.9range +1.5 to +2.5 | 1,729 | Season detail | |
| 2024 | Massachusetts | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | +2.3 | +0.9 to +3.7 | Sufficient evidence | +1.0 | +1.4 | +3.9range +3.2 to +4.7 | 2,079 | Season detail | |
| 2023 | Massachusetts | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | -0.6 | -1.6 to +0.6 | Sufficient evidence | -0.5 | -0.1 | +1.9range +1.4 to +2.4 | 1,651 | Season detail |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology
Game log
| Measure | Graphic | Last five | Listed games | Range |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minutes | 31:57 | 30:16 | 18:42–36:03 | |
| Points | 19.6 | 18.6 | 8.0–32.0 | |
| Game eFG% | 56.6% | 52.0% | 30.0%–90.0% |
| Date | Opponent | Result | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF | FG | 3P | FT | eFG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-17 | Tulsa | L 84–89 | 35:25 | 27 | 6 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 12-18 | 1-3 | 2-4 | 69.4% |
| 2026-03-11 | McNeese | L 59–76 | 29:44 | 18 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 7-17 | 1-3 | 3-4 | 44.1% |
| 2026-03-10 | A&M-Corpus Christi | W 60–58 | 35:39 | 24 | 6 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 10-16 | 1-1 | 3-4 | 65.6% |
| 2026-03-02 | UIW | W 76–68 | 33:04 | 12 | 3 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 6-12 | 0-1 | 0-2 | 50.0% |
| 2026-02-28 | Houston Christian | W 77–56 | 25:51 | 17 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 7-14 | 1-5 | 2-3 | 53.6% |
| 2026-02-23 | LSU New Orleans | L 73–77 | 32:44 | 19 | 1 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 7-18 | 1-2 | 4-6 | 41.7% |
| 2026-02-21 | Nicholls | W 81–78 | 32:25 | 16 | 3 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 3 | 4-9 | 2-4 | 6-8 | 55.6% |
| 2026-02-16 | A&M-Corpus Christi | W 78–68 | 29:30 | 18 | 5 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 5-12 | 0-2 | 8-12 | 41.7% |
| 2026-02-14 | UTRGV | W 66–57 | 31:40 | 32 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 12-18 | 1-3 | 7-9 | 69.4% |
| 2026-02-09 | East Texas A&M | W 74–70 | 30:34 | 17 | 6 | 7 | 2 | 0 | 5 | 3 | 5-16 | 0-2 | 7-13 | 31.3% |
| 2026-02-07 | Lamar University | W 84–74 | 31:26 | 19 | 5 | 8 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 5-12 | 1-3 | 8-8 | 45.8% |
| 2026-02-02 | McNeese | W 67–60 | 33:08 | 21 | 7 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 6-17 | 1-3 | 8-10 | 38.2% |
| 2026-01-31 | Southeastern La. | W 85–58 | 20:36 | 15 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 5-8 | 1-2 | 4-4 | 68.8% |
| 2026-01-27 | Northwestern St. | W 69–67 | 31:06 | 27 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 3 | 11-17 | 0-1 | 5-7 | 64.7% |
| 2026-01-24 | Lamar University | W 88–81 | 35:49 | 26 | 6 | 5 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 10-18 | 1-3 | 5-8 | 58.3% |
| 2026-01-19 | Nicholls | W 79–62 | 18:42 | 20 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 8-10 | 2-2 | 2-4 | 90.0% |
| 2026-01-17 | LSU New Orleans | W 84–79 | 36:03 | 15 | 7 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 5-11 | 0-2 | 5-8 | 45.5% |
| 2026-01-12 | UIW | W 56–46 | 22:31 | 15 | 7 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 6-11 | 0-0 | 3-6 | 54.5% |
| 2026-01-10 | Houston Christian | W 85–67 | 23:43 | 16 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 6-12 | 0-1 | 4-4 | 50.0% |
| 2026-01-05 | McNeese | L 64–66 | 32:13 | 8 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 2 | 3-10 | 0-3 | 2-3 | 30.0% |
| 2026-01-03 | Southeastern La. | W 73–63 | 25:30 | 17 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 5-12 | 1-4 | 6-8 | 45.8% |
| 2025-12-31 | Northwestern St. | W 74–64 | 31:28 | 21 | 2 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 7-13 | 1-3 | 6-9 | 57.7% |
| 2025-12-29 | East Texas A&M | W 75–48 | 27:58 | 15 | 5 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 6-12 | 1-2 | 2-4 | 54.2% |
| 2025-12-17 | A&M-Corpus Christi | W 69–60 | 29:43 | 15 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 5-10 | 0-0 | 5-12 | 50.0% |
| 2025-12-07 · NCAA | ULM | W 96–76 | 27:00 | 25 | 5 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 9-14 | 1-3 | 6-8 | 67.9% |
| 2025-12-03 | UTRGV | W 73–60 | 26:08 | 9 | 7 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 2-6 | 0-2 | 5-6 | 33.3% |
| 2025-11-29 | UT Arlington | L 61–66 | 32:49 | 20 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 8-21 | 1-1 | 3-3 | 40.5% |
| 2025-11-21 | Pepperdine | W 63–60 | 34:27 | 10 | 8 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 5-12 | 0-5 | 0-0 | 41.7% |
| 2025-11-18 | Fresno St. | L 78–80 | 33:18 | 13 | 8 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 5-16 | 1-4 | 2-2 | 34.4% |
| 2025-11-14 | Abilene Christian | W 76–66 | 35:59 | 15 | 12 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 4-12 | 0-0 | 7-10 | 33.3% |
| 2025-11-11 | Rice | W 81–69 | 30:29 | 27 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 10-17 | 2-4 | 5-6 | 64.7% |
| 2025-11-07 | Arkansas St. | W 90–65 | 31:47 | 26 | 5 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 11-17 | 3-6 | 1-1 | 73.5% |