Kyle Pulliam
William & Mary · 2025–26 · 28 available game logs · Speculative compensation · Model-implied values by season · Linked seasons and observed career performance
Logged performance
698:06 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 28
- Minutes per game
- 24:56
- Points per game
- 10.5
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 3.5 / 1.9
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 10.5 | 3.5 | 1.9 | 1.2 | 0.5 | 1.1 | 2.6 |
| Per 40 minutes | 16.8 | 5.6 | 3.0 | 1.9 | 0.7 | 1.8 | 4.1 |
| Season totals | 293 | 97 | 53 | 33 | 13 | 31 | 72 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 85–194 | 43.8% | 6.9 | 11.1 |
| 2P | 59–107 | 55.1% | 3.8 | 6.1 |
| 3P | 26–87 | 29.9% | 3.1 | 5.0 |
| FT | 97–119 | 81.5% | 4.3 | 6.8 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 50.5% | 59.5% | 44.8% | 61.3% | 1.71 |
Accepted logged appearances only; absent games are not zeroes. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
William & Mary · Low and other · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $23K
- 80% range $5K to $71K
- Median share of team pool
- 9.7%
- team pool $280K, 80% range $105K to $765K
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $20K to $24K
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $2K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 60.5%
- Sufficient evidence
- Range driven by assumption, not data
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. Tier prior from anonymous surveys and sources, scaled so that all non-Power budgets sum to the national total the College Sports Commission reported paid for 2025-26 ($1,770,453,776 over 307 schools) less the Power 4 total, times a men's basketball share; weak anchor.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
William & Mary: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ
Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | William & Mary | $23Kspeculative | $5K to $71K | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | +0.4 | -0.7 to +1.5 | Sufficient evidence | +0.7 | -0.3 | +4.3range +3.8 to +4.8 | 2,417 | Season detail | |
| 2025 | William & Mary | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | -1.7 | -2.7 to -0.5 | Sufficient evidence | +0.3 | -2.0 | +1.3range +1.0 to +1.8 | 1,269 | Season detail |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology
Game log
| Measure | Graphic | Last five | Listed games | Range |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minutes | 20:43 | 24:56 | 2:18–32:41 | |
| Points | 7.0 | 10.5 | 2.0–22.0 | |
| Game eFG% | 42.0% | 50.0% | 20.0%–92.9% |
| Date | Opponent | Result | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF | FG | 3P | FT | eFG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-08 · NCAA | Hofstra | L 61–92 | 20:00 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 1-5 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 20.0% |
| 2026-03-07 | Elon | W 72–62 | 22:52 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 1-5 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 20.0% |
| 2026-03-03 | Hampton | W 94–85 | 24:38 | 10 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3-8 | 1-3 | 3-4 | 43.8% |
| 2026-02-28 | N.C. A&T | W 91–88 | 8:16 | 10 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4-6 | 2-3 | 0-0 | 83.3% |
| 2026-02-26 | Northeastern | W 84–77 | 27:51 | 11 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3-7 | 0-2 | 5-6 | 42.9% |
| 2026-02-19 | Campbell | L 83–84 | 28:05 | 12 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 4 | 2-5 | 0-3 | 8-10 | 40.0% |
| 2026-02-14 | Elon | L 78–81 | 30:40 | 18 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 6-11 | 3-8 | 3-4 | 68.2% |
| 2026-02-12 · NCAA | Northeastern | W 94–67 | 25:42 | 8 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 3-8 | 0-3 | 2-4 | 37.5% |
| 2026-02-07 | Hampton | L 74–77 | 31:26 | 13 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3-8 | 0-3 | 7-8 | 37.5% |
| 2026-02-05 | UNCW | W 85–78 | 32:41 | 10 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 3-8 | 2-3 | 2-3 | 50.0% |
| 2026-01-31 | Campbell | L 96–104 | 27:39 | 13 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 4-10 | 0-3 | 5-5 | 40.0% |
| 2026-01-29 | Elon | L 76–79 | 26:53 | 8 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2-5 | 1-1 | 3-4 | 50.0% |
| 2026-01-24 | Hofstra | W 89–82 | 27:17 | 8 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2-8 | 2-7 | 2-2 | 37.5% |
| 2026-01-22 | UNCW | W 77–70 | 27:34 | 16 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 4-7 | 1-3 | 7-8 | 64.3% |
| 2026-01-15 | N.C. A&T | W 97–89 | 16:59 | 6 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 2-4 | 0-1 | 2-2 | 50.0% |
| 2026-01-10 | Drexel | L 58–64 | 27:11 | 10 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 4-7 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 71.4% |
| 2026-01-08 | Monmouth | L 70–81 | 25:55 | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2-7 | 0-4 | 1-2 | 28.6% |
| 2026-01-05 | Col. of Charleston | L 79–88 | 25:08 | 9 | 7 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 2-8 | 1-3 | 4-5 | 31.3% |
| 2025-12-31 | Stony Brook | W 76–57 | 27:03 | 17 | 6 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 5-7 | 2-3 | 5-5 | 85.7% |
| 2025-12-29 | Towson | W 84–70 | 27:27 | 12 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4-7 | 1-3 | 3-4 | 64.3% |
| 2025-12-18 | Radford | W 96–83 | 27:23 | 22 | 7 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 6-7 | 1-1 | 9-10 | 92.9% |
| 2025-12-06 | George Washington | L 86–99 | 17:13 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 1-4 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 25.0% |
| 2025-11-25 · NCAA | Abilene Christian | W 92–58 | 2:18 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 2-2 | — |
| 2025-11-24 | UTEP | W 74–63 | 25:12 | 16 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 6-11 | 1-3 | 3-4 | 59.1% |
| 2025-11-19 | Bowling Green | W 82–74 | 30:08 | 13 | 7 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2-4 | 1-3 | 8-8 | 62.5% |
| 2025-11-15 | St. John's (NY) | L 60–93 | 30:46 | 8 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 3-11 | 2-5 | 0-0 | 36.4% |
| 2025-11-11 | Richmond | L 86–90 | 25:44 | 16 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 4-9 | 1-5 | 7-9 | 50.0% |
| 2025-11-08 | Norfolk St. | W 81–78 | 28:05 | 14 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 3-7 | 2-5 | 6-10 | 57.1% |