Ace Flagg
Maine · 2025–26 · 31 available game logs · Speculative compensation · Model-implied values by season · Linked seasons and observed career performance
Logged performance
757:00 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 31
- Minutes per game
- 24:25
- Points per game
- 6.7
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 4.1 / 1.4
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 6.7 | 4.1 | 1.4 | 1.4 | 0.4 | 1.6 | 3.1 |
| Per 40 minutes | 11.0 | 6.7 | 2.3 | 2.3 | 0.7 | 2.6 | 5.1 |
| Season totals | 209 | 127 | 43 | 43 | 13 | 49 | 97 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 71–162 | 43.8% | 5.2 | 8.6 |
| 2P | 50–103 | 48.5% | 3.3 | 5.4 |
| 3P | 21–59 | 35.6% | 1.9 | 3.1 |
| FT | 46–66 | 69.7% | 2.1 | 3.5 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 50.3% | 54.7% | 36.4% | 40.7% | 0.88 |
Accepted logged appearances only; absent games are not zeroes. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
Maine · Low and other · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $20K
- 80% range $2K to $82K
- Median share of team pool
- 11.0%
- team pool $225K, 80% range $83K to $595K
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $19K to $20K
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $2K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 59.4%
- Sufficient evidence
- Range driven by assumption, not data
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. Tier prior from anonymous surveys and sources, scaled so that all non-Power budgets sum to the national total the College Sports Commission reported paid for 2025-26 ($1,770,453,776 over 307 schools) less the Power 4 total, times a men's basketball share; weak anchor.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
Maine: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ
Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Maine | $20Kspeculative | $2K to $82K | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | -0.9 | -2.1 to +0.5 | Sufficient evidence | -1.2 | +0.3 | +2.9range +2.5 to +3.4 | 2,249 | Season detail |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology
Game log
| Measure | Graphic | Last five | Listed games | Range |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minutes | 30:28 | 24:25 | 12:17–35:09 | |
| Points | 14.4 | 6.7 | 0.0–22.0 | |
| Game eFG% | 69.9% | 47.9% | 0.0%–150.0% |
| Date | Opponent | Result | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF | FG | 3P | FT | eFG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-07 | NJIT | L 58–60 | 33:58 | 14 | 8 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 5-9 | 2-4 | 2-3 | 66.7% |
| 2026-03-03 | UMass Lowell | L 56–67 | 29:29 | 9 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 2-6 | 1-3 | 4-6 | 41.7% |
| 2026-02-28 | Binghamton | L 67–74 | 30:31 | 12 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 4-9 | 0-1 | 4-6 | 44.4% |
| 2026-02-26 | UAlbany | W 70–59 | 34:48 | 22 | 7 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 8-9 | 4-4 | 2-2 | 111.1% |
| 2026-02-21 | New Hampshire | W 61–58 | 23:32 | 15 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 5-7 | 2-3 | 3-4 | 85.7% |
| 2026-02-14 | NJIT | L 58–67 | 34:13 | 11 | 6 | 1 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 4-10 | 0-4 | 3-4 | 40.0% |
| 2026-02-12 | UMBC | L 62–78 | 18:35 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0.0% |
| 2026-02-07 | Bryant | L 67–73 | 30:40 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 1-3 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 50.0% |
| 2026-02-05 | Vermont | W 76–70 | 15:36 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 1-1 | 1-1 | 0-1 | 150.0% |
| 2026-01-31 | UMass Lowell | L 77–91 | 31:46 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 2-7 | 0-2 | 1-1 | 28.6% |
| 2026-01-24 | Binghamton | W 79–63 | 26:25 | 11 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 4-9 | 3-4 | 0-1 | 61.1% |
| 2026-01-22 | UAlbany | W 52–49 | 33:37 | 12 | 8 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 4-7 | 1-1 | 3-4 | 64.3% |
| 2026-01-19 | New Hampshire | L 48–65 | 16:03 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 0-5 | 0-2 | 4-4 | 0.0% |
| 2026-01-15 | Vermont | L 62–67 | 12:17 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-3 | 0-1 | 2-2 | 0.0% |
| 2026-01-10 | NJIT | W 74–70 | 20:32 | 10 | 7 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 3-3 | 1-1 | 3-3 | 116.7% |
| 2026-01-08 | UMBC | L 62–69 | 35:09 | 6 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 3-7 | 0-2 | 0-2 | 42.9% |
| 2026-01-03 | Bryant | L 51–56 | 22:20 | 3 | 7 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 1-6 | 0-1 | 1-2 | 16.7% |
| 2025-12-21 | Drexel | L 56–74 | 17:49 | 8 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 3-5 | 0-0 | 2-3 | 60.0% |
| 2025-12-13 | Canisius | L 43–70 | 17:28 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 1-4 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 37.5% |
| 2025-12-10 | Boston U. | W 69–59 | 13:04 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 1-3 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 50.0% |
| 2025-12-06 | Miami (OH) | L 61–93 | 16:35 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 2-5 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 50.0% |
| 2025-12-03 | Ohio | L 57–79 | 19:33 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1-5 | 1-2 | 1-2 | 30.0% |
| 2025-11-30 | Siena | L 60–64 | 29:24 | 7 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 5 | 3-4 | 1-2 | 0-1 | 87.5% |
| 2025-11-29 | Longwood | L 61–65 | 23:20 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0-2 | 0-1 | 1-2 | 0.0% |
| 2025-11-28 | American | L 61–74 | 21:36 | 4 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 1-2 | 0-1 | 2-2 | 50.0% |
| 2025-11-23 | Brown | L 53–58 | 28:07 | 4 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 1-3 | 0-1 | 2-4 | 33.3% |
| 2025-11-19 | Merrimack | L 65–72 | 21:08 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 4-5 | 0.0% |
| 2025-11-16 | Quinnipiac | L 64–70 | 19:23 | 0 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0-5 | 0-3 | 0-0 | 0.0% |
| 2025-11-10 | Rutgers | L 60–72 | 21:08 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 3-5 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 60.0% |
| 2025-11-08 | Stony Brook | L 60–71 | 29:31 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 4-7 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 57.1% |
| 2025-11-03 | George Washington | L 47–67 | 29:23 | 10 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 4-8 | 0-2 | 2-2 | 50.0% |