DeJuan Campbell
California · 2025–26 · 22 available game logs · Speculative compensation · Model-implied values by season · Linked seasons and observed career performance
Logged performance
333:08 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 22
- Minutes per game
- 15:09
- Points per game
- 3.3
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 1.8 / 0.8
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 3.3 | 1.8 | 0.8 | 0.5 | 0.1 | 0.5 | 0.9 |
| Per 40 minutes | 8.8 | 4.8 | 2.2 | 1.2 | 0.4 | 1.4 | 2.4 |
| Season totals | 73 | 40 | 18 | 10 | 3 | 12 | 20 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 27–75 | 36.0%† | 3.4 | 9.0 |
| 2P | 15–46 | 32.6%† | 2.1 | 5.5 |
| 3P | 12–29 | 41.4%† | 1.3 | 3.5 |
| FT | 7–16 | 43.8%† | 0.7 | 1.9 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 44.0%† | 44.5%† | 38.7%† | 21.3%† | 1.50 |
Accepted logged appearances only; absent games are not zeroes. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25); the field-goal floor applies to the derived rates above. Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
California · Power 4 · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $68K
- 80% range $17K to $155K
- Median share of team pool
- 2.0%
- team pool $3.60M, 80% range $2.60M to $4.95M
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $68K in all four
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $22K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 24.6%
- Sufficient evidence
- Range driven by assumption, not data
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. House-settlement $20.5M cap (College Sports Commission, 2026-10-01) times a modelled utilisation of about 97 percent times a men's basketball share of about 18 percent (school statements and an industry study); Power 4 schools are at or near the cap nationally.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
California: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ
Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | California | $68Kspeculative | $17K to $155K | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | -1.3 | -2.8 to +0.4 | Sufficient evidence | -0.8 | -0.5 | +1.4range +1.1 to +1.7 | 1,099 | Season detail |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology
Game log
| Measure | Graphic | Last five | Listed games | Range |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minutes | 15:58 | 15:09 | 6:28–25:45 | |
| Points | 3.8 | 3.3 | 0.0–8.0 | |
| Game eFG% | 49.3% | 45.6% | 0.0%–150.0% |
| Date | Opponent | Result | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF | FG | 3P | FT | eFG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-22 | Saint Joseph's | L 75–76 | 16:28 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1-3 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 50.0% |
| 2026-03-18 | UIC | W 91–73 | 17:07 | 6 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2-4 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 75.0% |
| 2026-03-11 | Florida St. | L 89–95 | 14:34 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1-4 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 25.0% |
| 2026-03-07 | Wake Forest | L 73–80 | 15:25 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | — |
| 2026-03-04 | Georgia Tech | W 76–65 | 16:17 | 8 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3-10 | 0-3 | 2-2 | 30.0% |
| 2026-02-28 | Pittsburgh | L 56–72 | 23:26 | 8 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3-6 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 66.7% |
| 2026-02-21 | Stanford | W 72–66 | 7:06 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0.0% |
| 2026-02-14 | Boston College | W 86–75 | 6:28 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0-2 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0.0% |
| 2026-02-11 | Syracuse | L 100–107 | 15:12 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 0-2 | 33.3% |
| 2026-02-07 | Clemson | L 55–77 | 18:26 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 1-2 | — |
| 2026-02-04 | Georgia Tech | W 90–85 | 16:07 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2-6 | 2-5 | 0-0 | 50.0% |
| 2026-01-31 | Miami (FL) | W 86–85 | 10:49 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1-1 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 150.0% |
| 2026-01-28 | Florida St. | L 61–63 | 16:29 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1-4 | 0-0 | 3-3 | 25.0% |
| 2026-01-24 | Stanford | W 78–66 | 10:54 | 7 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3-3 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 116.7% |
| 2026-01-17 | North Carolina | W 84–78 | 15:07 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2-3 | 1-1 | 0-1 | 83.3% |
| 2026-01-14 | Duke | L 56–71 | 13:48 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2-3 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 66.7% |
| 2026-01-10 | Virginia Tech | L 75–78 | 13:41 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1-4 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 37.5% |
| 2026-01-07 | Virginia | L 60–84 | 10:09 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0.0% |
| 2025-12-13 | Northwestern St. | W 79–70 | 13:39 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0.0% |
| 2025-12-06 | Pacific | W 67–61 | 25:45 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1-3 | 0-1 | 1-6 | 33.3% |
| 2025-12-02 | Utah | W 79–72 | 21:10 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1-5 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 30.0% |
| 2025-11-25 | UCLA | W 80–72 | 15:01 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 2-5 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 40.0% |