Jonathan Powell
North Carolina · 2025–26 · 33 available game logs · Speculative compensation · Model-implied values by season · Linked seasons and observed career performance
Logged performance
531:43 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 33
- Minutes per game
- 16:07
- Points per game
- 4.8
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 2.4 / 0.7
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 4.8 | 2.4 | 0.7 | 0.5 | 0.1 | 0.3 | 1.3 |
| Per 40 minutes | 11.9 | 5.9 | 1.8 | 1.2 | 0.2 | 0.8 | 3.2 |
| Season totals | 158 | 79 | 24 | 16 | 2 | 11 | 42 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 53–139 | 38.1% | 4.2 | 10.5 |
| 2P | 15–35 | 42.9%† | 1.1 | 2.6 |
| 3P | 38–104 | 36.5% | 3.2 | 7.8 |
| FT | 14–29 | 48.3% | 0.9 | 2.2 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 51.8% | 52.1% | 74.8% | 20.9% | 2.18 |
Accepted logged appearances only; absent games are not zeroes. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
North Carolina · Power 4 · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $165K
- 80% range $45K to $285K
- Median share of team pool
- 4.9%
- team pool $3.60M, 80% range $2.60M to $5.00M
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $165K in all four
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $22K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 39.1%
- Sufficient evidence
- Range driven by assumption, not data
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. House-settlement $20.5M cap (College Sports Commission, 2026-10-01) times a modelled utilisation of about 97 percent times a men's basketball share of about 18 percent (school statements and an industry study); Power 4 schools are at or near the cap nationally.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
North Carolina: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ
Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | North Carolina | $165Kspeculative | $45K to $285K | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | +1.4 | +0.2 to +2.5 | Sufficient evidence | +0.6 | +0.8 | +2.8range +2.4 to +3.1 | 1,665 | Season detail | |
| 2025 | West Virginia | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | +0.9 | -0.3 to +1.9 | Sufficient evidence | -0.2 | +1.1 | +3.7range +3.2 to +4.4 | 3,088 | Season detail |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology
Game log
| Measure | Graphic | Last five | Listed games | Range |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minutes | 16:35 | 16:07 | 3:20–26:21 | |
| Points | 4.8 | 4.8 | 0.0–17.0 | |
| Game eFG% | 43.3% | 52.7% | 0.0%–150.0% |
| Date | Opponent | Result | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF | FG | 3P | FT | eFG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-19 | VCU | L 78–82 | 20:28 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1-6 | 0-5 | 1-1 | 16.7% |
| 2026-03-12 | Clemson | L 79–80 | 9:57 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1-3 | 1-3 | 0-2 | 50.0% |
| 2026-03-07 | Duke | L 61–76 | 12:15 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0-4 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0.0% |
| 2026-03-03 | Clemson | W 67–63 | 18:10 | 3 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1-5 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 30.0% |
| 2026-02-28 | Virginia Tech | W 89–82 | 22:03 | 15 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4-5 | 4-5 | 3-5 | 120.0% |
| 2026-02-23 | Louisville | W 77–74 | 9:22 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | — |
| 2026-02-21 | Syracuse | W 77–64 | 17:23 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2-5 | 2-3 | 0-0 | 60.0% |
| 2026-02-17 | NC State | L 58–82 | 26:21 | 9 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3-8 | 1-4 | 2-2 | 43.8% |
| 2026-02-14 | Pittsburgh | W 79–65 | 14:55 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2-3 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 83.3% |
| 2026-02-10 | Miami (FL) | L 66–75 | 19:39 | 5 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2-4 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 62.5% |
| 2026-02-07 | Duke | W 71–68 | 15:13 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1-3 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 50.0% |
| 2026-02-02 | Syracuse | W 87–77 | 12:49 | 12 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 4-5 | 3-4 | 1-2 | 110.0% |
| 2026-01-31 | Georgia Tech | W 91–75 | 9:11 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-3 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0.0% |
| 2026-01-24 | Virginia | W 85–80 | 9:38 | 0 | 7 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0.0% |
| 2026-01-21 | Notre Dame | W 91–69 | 19:39 | 5 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2-5 | 1-4 | 0-0 | 50.0% |
| 2026-01-17 | California | L 78–84 | 10:53 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1-1 | 1-1 | 0-2 | 150.0% |
| 2026-01-14 | Stanford | L 90–95 | 3:20 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1-2 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 50.0% |
| 2026-01-10 | Wake Forest | W 87–84 | 12:08 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2-2 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 150.0% |
| 2026-01-03 | SMU | L 83–97 | 9:57 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1-4 | 0-3 | 0-0 | 25.0% |
| 2025-12-30 | Florida St. | W 79–66 | 24:24 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2-6 | 2-6 | 0-0 | 50.0% |
| 2025-12-22 | East Carolina | W 99–51 | 19:25 | 7 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2-6 | 2-5 | 1-2 | 50.0% |
| 2025-12-20 | Ohio St. | W 71–70 | 14:25 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1-2 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 75.0% |
| 2025-12-16 | ETSU | W 77–58 | 24:00 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2-8 | 1-6 | 0-0 | 31.3% |
| 2025-12-13 | USC Upstate | W 80–62 | 23:28 | 17 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 6-9 | 3-6 | 2-3 | 83.3% |
| 2025-12-07 | Georgetown | W 81–61 | 13:26 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2-7 | 1-5 | 0-2 | 35.7% |
| 2025-12-02 | Kentucky | W 67–64 | 20:43 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2-3 | 2-3 | 0-0 | 100.0% |
| 2025-11-27 | Michigan St. | L 58–74 | 22:52 | 3 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1-5 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 30.0% |
| 2025-11-25 | St. Bonaventure | W 85–70 | 18:12 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 1-2 | 0.0% |
| 2025-11-18 | Navy | W 73–61 | 16:23 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0.0% |
| 2025-11-14 | N.C. Central | W 97–53 | 18:39 | 9 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2-6 | 2-6 | 3-4 | 50.0% |
| 2025-11-11 | Radford | W 89–74 | 21:10 | 8 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 3-6 | 2-4 | 0-2 | 66.7% |
| 2025-11-07 | Kansas | W 87–74 | 6:09 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1-4 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 37.5% |
| 2025-11-03 | Central Ark. | W 94–54 | 15:06 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1-6 | 1-6 | 0-0 | 25.0% |