Greyson Uelmen
North Dakota · 2025–26 · 32 available game logs · Speculative compensation · Model-implied values by season · Linked seasons and observed career performance
Logged performance
918:11 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 32
- Minutes per game
- 28:42
- Points per game
- 17.4
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 2.8 / 2.3
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 17.4 | 2.8 | 2.3 | 1.1 | 0.1 | 2.6 | 2.1 |
| Per 40 minutes | 24.3 | 4.0 | 3.3 | 1.6 | 0.1 | 3.6 | 3.0 |
| Season totals | 557 | 91 | 75 | 36 | 2 | 82 | 68 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 177–362 | 48.9% | 11.3 | 15.8 |
| 2P | 141–251 | 56.2% | 7.8 | 10.9 |
| 3P | 36–111 | 32.4% | 3.5 | 4.8 |
| FT | 167–209 | 79.9% | 6.5 | 9.1 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 53.9% | 61.3% | 30.7% | 57.7% | 0.91 |
Accepted logged appearances only; absent games are not zeroes. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
North Dakota · Low and other · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $18K
- 80% range $2K to $71K
- Median share of team pool
- 10.1%
- team pool $275K, 80% range $100K to $730K
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $16K to $19K
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $2K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 71.6%
- Sufficient evidence
- Range driven by assumption, not data
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. Tier prior from anonymous surveys and sources, scaled so that all non-Power budgets sum to the national total the College Sports Commission reported paid for 2025-26 ($1,770,453,776 over 307 schools) less the Power 4 total, times a men's basketball share; weak anchor.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
North Dakota: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ
Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | North Dakota | $18Kspeculative | $2K to $71K | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | -0.9 | -2.1 to +0.3 | Sufficient evidence | +0.9 | -1.8 | +3.7range +3.1 to +4.2 | 2,379 | Season detail |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology
Game log
| Measure | Graphic | Last five | Listed games | Range |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minutes | 30:18 | 28:42 | 20:06–36:39 | |
| Points | 24.8 | 17.4 | 6.0–41.0 | |
| Game eFG% | 61.9% | 54.4% | 25.0%–100.0% |
| Date | Opponent | Result | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF | FG | 3P | FT | eFG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-08 | North Dakota St. | L 62–70 | 28:31 | 24 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 7-11 | 2-2 | 8-8 | 72.7% |
| 2026-03-07 | St. Thomas (MN) | W 67–66 | 30:21 | 28 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 9-11 | 1-2 | 9-12 | 86.4% |
| 2026-03-06 | Denver | W 83–67 | 31:03 | 41 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 5 | 2 | 13-19 | 3-5 | 12-18 | 76.3% |
| 2026-02-28 | North Dakota St. | L 63–96 | 27:44 | 12 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 4-13 | 0-4 | 4-6 | 30.8% |
| 2026-02-21 | South Dakota St. | L 83–91 | 33:51 | 19 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 6-15 | 1-4 | 6-7 | 43.3% |
| 2026-02-19 | Kansas City | W 85–70 | 32:41 | 23 | 5 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 1 | 5-15 | 1-6 | 12-12 | 36.7% |
| 2026-02-14 | North Dakota St. | L 66–83 | 34:40 | 16 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 6-11 | 1-4 | 3-4 | 59.1% |
| 2026-02-11 | South Dakota | W 72–71 | 36:39 | 24 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 9-18 | 1-4 | 5-6 | 52.8% |
| 2026-02-07 | Denver | L 79–98 | 33:24 | 24 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 10-19 | 1-6 | 3-3 | 55.3% |
| 2026-02-05 | Omaha | W 76–73 | 36:37 | 21 | 8 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 7-20 | 1-5 | 6-6 | 37.5% |
| 2026-01-29 | St. Thomas (MN) | W 81–80 | 29:21 | 12 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 4-5 | 2-3 | 2-4 | 100.0% |
| 2026-01-24 | Denver | W 93–86 | 23:34 | 30 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 9-15 | 3-6 | 9-13 | 70.0% |
| 2026-01-22 | Oral Roberts | W 79–62 | 32:23 | 14 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3-9 | 0-1 | 8-8 | 33.3% |
| 2026-01-17 | South Dakota | W 96–80 | 29:37 | 26 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 10-17 | 4-8 | 2-2 | 70.6% |
| 2026-01-15 | St. Thomas (MN) | L 80–91 | 31:16 | 19 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 6 | 2 | 5-10 | 1-3 | 8-10 | 55.0% |
| 2026-01-10 | Kansas City | W 81–79 | 27:51 | 13 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 4-11 | 0-2 | 5-10 | 36.4% |
| 2026-01-08 | Omaha | L 79–90 | 25:45 | 19 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 5-9 | 3-4 | 6-6 | 72.2% |
| 2026-01-03 | South Dakota St. | W 90–87 | 28:50 | 17 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 4-10 | 1-7 | 8-8 | 45.0% |
| 2026-01-01 | Oral Roberts | W 72–61 | 20:06 | 9 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 1 | 3-6 | 0-1 | 3-3 | 50.0% |
| 2025-12-21 | Nebraska | L 55–78 | 28:31 | 8 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 3-12 | 2-7 | 0-0 | 33.3% |
| 2025-12-18 | Winthrop | W 90–88 | 25:29 | 11 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4-9 | 2-4 | 1-3 | 55.6% |
| 2025-12-13 | Western Ill. | L 66–69 | 27:59 | 13 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 4 | 3-7 | 0-1 | 7-8 | 42.9% |
| 2025-12-06 | Montana | L 75–79 | 25:14 | 12 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 4-10 | 0-1 | 4-4 | 40.0% |
| 2025-12-03 | Idaho | L 58–90 | 24:26 | 7 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 2-8 | 0-3 | 3-4 | 25.0% |
| 2025-11-29 | Hawaii | L 55–92 | 29:17 | 19 | 6 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 5 | 2 | 5-7 | 1-2 | 8-12 | 78.6% |
| 2025-11-23 | Western Ill. | W 78–69 | 31:51 | 16 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 5-8 | 1-2 | 5-6 | 68.8% |
| 2025-11-22 | Coastal Carolina | L 58–75 | 27:18 | 13 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 4-10 | 1-3 | 4-4 | 45.0% |
| 2025-11-19 · NCAA | Creighton | L 60–75 | 25:42 | 13 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 5-14 | 0-2 | 3-3 | 35.7% |
| 2025-11-15 · NCAA | UC Riverside | W 76–74 | 23:00 | 18 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 8-14 | 0-2 | 2-2 | 57.1% |
| 2025-11-09 · NCAA | CSUN | L 85–93 | 28:36 | 24 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 7-9 | 3-4 | 7-9 | 94.4% |
| 2025-11-06 | UC Riverside | L 70–74 | 22:34 | 6 | 3 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 2-5 | 0-2 | 2-4 | 40.0% |
| 2025-11-03 | Alabama | L 62–91 | 24:00 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 2-5 | 0-1 | 2-4 | 40.0% |