Marqui Worthy
UC Riverside · 2025–26 · 30 available game logs · Speculative compensation · Model-implied values by season
Logged performance
1055:51 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 30
- Minutes per game
- 35:12
- Points per game
- 16.6
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 4.7 / 3.0
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 16.6 | 4.7 | 3.0 | 1.3 | 0.3 | 3.4 | 2.5 |
| Per 40 minutes | 18.9 | 5.3 | 3.4 | 1.5 | 0.3 | 3.9 | 2.9 |
| Season totals | 498 | 140 | 90 | 39 | 9 | 103 | 76 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 156–360 | 43.3% | 12.0 | 13.6 |
| 2P | 110–222 | 49.5% | 7.4 | 8.4 |
| 3P | 46–138 | 33.3% | 4.6 | 5.2 |
| FT | 140–186 | 75.3% | 6.2 | 7.0 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 49.7% | 56.4% | 38.3% | 51.7% | 0.87 |
Accepted logged appearances only; absent games are not zeroes. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
UC Riverside · Low and other · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $29K
- 80% range $3K to $105K
- Median share of team pool
- 16.9%
- team pool $220K, 80% range $78K to $590K
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $27K to $34K
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $2K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 87.7%
- Sufficient evidence
- Range driven by assumption, not data
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. Tier prior from anonymous surveys and sources, scaled so that all non-Power budgets sum to the national total the College Sports Commission reported paid for 2025-26 ($1,770,453,776 over 307 schools) less the Power 4 total, times a men's basketball share; weak anchor.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
UC Riverside: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ
Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | UC Riverside | $29Kspeculative | $3K to $105K | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | -0.3 | -1.4 to +0.7 | Sufficient evidence | -0.2 | -0.1 | +4.1range +3.6 to +4.5 | 3,361 | Prior built from the box-score line only, without a prior-season value. Season detail |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology
Game log
| Measure | Graphic | Last five | Listed games | Range |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minutes | 36:10 | 35:12 | 21:08–40:00 | |
| Points | 19.8 | 16.6 | 0.0–38.0 | |
| Game eFG% | 64.0% | 49.5% | 0.0%–100.0% |
| Date | Opponent | Result | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF | FG | 3P | FT | eFG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-06 | Hawaii | L 74–93 | 39:21 | 17 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 6-18 | 3-7 | 2-2 | 41.7% |
| 2026-02-28 | CSUN | W 95–84 | 39:56 | 38 | 6 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 12-20 | 3-7 | 11-13 | 67.5% |
| 2026-02-26 | UC Santa Barbara | L 59–70 | 38:28 | 15 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 4-11 | 1-4 | 6-6 | 40.9% |
| 2026-02-21 | UC Davis | L 73–78 | 25:10 | 12 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 3-4 | 2-3 | 4-4 | 100.0% |
| 2026-02-19 | CSU Bakersfield | W 93–65 | 37:57 | 17 | 7 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 6-10 | 2-4 | 3-6 | 70.0% |
| 2026-02-14 | UC San Diego | L 66–72 | 39:56 | 15 | 7 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 4-16 | 2-10 | 5-6 | 31.3% |
| 2026-02-12 | UC Santa Barbara | L 68–76 | 37:52 | 14 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 6-9 | 1-3 | 1-2 | 72.2% |
| 2026-02-07 | CSUN | L 74–88 | 38:40 | 36 | 4 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 12-25 | 5-13 | 7-7 | 58.0% |
| 2026-02-05 | Cal St. Fullerton | L 72–78 | 31:29 | 18 | 8 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 7-13 | 3-5 | 1-4 | 65.4% |
| 2026-01-31 | Cal Poly | L 87–94 | 36:17 | 18 | 7 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 4-13 | 1-3 | 9-14 | 34.6% |
| 2026-01-29 | Long Beach St. | W 71–61 | 39:11 | 10 | 5 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3-15 | 0-4 | 4-4 | 20.0% |
| 2026-01-24 | UC Davis | L 66–74 | 32:33 | 18 | 8 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 4 | 7-14 | 2-3 | 2-3 | 57.1% |
| 2026-01-22 | UC Irvine | L 66–80 | 37:01 | 22 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 7-16 | 2-8 | 6-7 | 50.0% |
| 2026-01-17 | Cal St. Fullerton | W 81–72 | 38:20 | 22 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 6-15 | 0-6 | 10-13 | 40.0% |
| 2026-01-15 | Long Beach St. | L 73–88 | 36:02 | 23 | 9 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 8-17 | 1-4 | 6-9 | 50.0% |
| 2026-01-10 | UC San Diego | L 66–69 | 31:47 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0-3 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0.0% |
| 2026-01-08 | CSU Bakersfield | L 66–67 | 40:00 | 19 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 5 | 2 | 5-15 | 2-6 | 7-8 | 40.0% |
| 2026-01-01 | Hawaii | L 45–88 | 37:56 | 14 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3-11 | 1-3 | 7-10 | 31.8% |
| 2025-12-23 | UCLA | L 65–97 | 29:57 | 11 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 7 | 3 | 5-11 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 50.0% |
| 2025-12-20 | St. Thomas (MN) | L 78–92 | 34:15 | 9 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 3-10 | 1-5 | 2-2 | 35.0% |
| 2025-12-13 | BYU | L 53–100 | 21:08 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 5 | 2-5 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 50.0% |
| 2025-12-06 | Cal Poly | W 88–84 | 37:56 | 24 | 5 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 9-16 | 3-6 | 3-6 | 65.6% |
| 2025-12-04 | UC Irvine | L 60–73 | 35:01 | 26 | 8 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 3 | 6-13 | 3-6 | 11-14 | 57.7% |
| 2025-11-29 | Utah Tech | L 69–77 | 39:45 | 10 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 2-7 | 1-3 | 5-6 | 35.7% |
| 2025-11-24 | Grambling | W 83–74 | 34:19 | 10 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 2-5 | 1-2 | 5-7 | 50.0% |
| 2025-11-21 | San Diego | W 85–71 | 27:14 | 12 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 3-5 | 0-0 | 6-11 | 60.0% |
| 2025-11-18 | California Baptist | L 57–80 | 29:19 | 15 | 6 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 7 | 3 | 7-13 | 1-5 | 0-2 | 57.7% |
| 2025-11-15 · NCAA | North Dakota | L 74–76 | 38:42 | 20 | 6 | 7 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 2 | 6-12 | 2-6 | 6-7 | 58.3% |
| 2025-11-11 | New Mexico | L 68–82 | 32:24 | 7 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 2-9 | 1-4 | 2-2 | 27.8% |
| 2025-11-06 | North Dakota | W 74–70 | 37:55 | 21 | 5 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 6-9 | 0-2 | 9-11 | 66.7% |