Justin Allen
Green Bay · 2025–26 · 30 available game logs · Speculative compensation · Model-implied values by season · Linked seasons and observed career performance
Logged performance
819:34 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 30
- Minutes per game
- 27:19
- Points per game
- 14.2
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 3.8 / 1.7
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 14.2 | 3.8 | 1.7 | 0.5 | 0.1 | 1.3 | 1.8 |
| Per 40 minutes | 20.8 | 5.6 | 2.5 | 0.8 | 0.1 | 1.9 | 2.7 |
| Season totals | 427 | 115 | 51 | 16 | 3 | 39 | 55 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 154–317 | 48.6% | 10.6 | 15.5 |
| 2P | 132–232 | 56.9% | 7.7 | 11.3 |
| 3P | 22–85 | 25.9% | 2.8 | 4.1 |
| FT | 97–118 | 82.2% | 3.9 | 5.8 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 52.1% | 57.9% | 26.8% | 37.2% | 1.31 |
Accepted logged appearances only; absent games are not zeroes. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
WI Green Bay · Low and other · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $15K
- 80% range $2K to $52K
- Median share of team pool
- 10.4%
- team pool $190K, 80% range $69K to $515K
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $14K to $19K
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $1K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 68.1%
- Sufficient evidence
- Range driven by assumption, not data
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. Tier prior from anonymous surveys and sources, scaled so that all non-Power budgets sum to the national total the College Sports Commission reported paid for 2025-26 ($1,770,453,776 over 307 schools) less the Power 4 total, times a men's basketball share; weak anchor.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
WI Green Bay: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ
Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | WI Green Bay | $15Kspeculative | $2K to $52K | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | -0.3 | -1.4 to +0.9 | Sufficient evidence | +1.6 | -2.0 | +4.4range +3.8 to +5.0 | 2,492 | Season detail |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology
Game log
| Measure | Graphic | Last five | Listed games | Range |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minutes | 34:26 | 27:19 | 5:18–37:30 | |
| Points | 18.2 | 14.2 | 2.0–34.0 | |
| Game eFG% | 52.4% | 49.9% | 0.0%–90.0% |
| Date | Opponent | Result | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF | FG | 3P | FT | eFG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-08 | Northern Ky. | L 76–96 | 30:58 | 18 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 7-14 | 1-1 | 3-4 | 53.6% |
| 2026-03-03 | Purdue Fort Wayne | W 64–56 | 30:07 | 13 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4-12 | 0-4 | 5-6 | 33.3% |
| 2026-02-28 | Youngstown St. | W 85–63 | 37:18 | 22 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 9-13 | 0-2 | 4-5 | 69.2% |
| 2026-02-22 | Detroit Mercy | L 70–74 | 36:19 | 17 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 7-16 | 2-2 | 1-1 | 50.0% |
| 2026-02-20 | Oakland | W 73–68 | 37:30 | 21 | 4 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 9-17 | 1-2 | 2-2 | 55.9% |
| 2026-02-15 | Milwaukee | L 72–75 | 24:27 | 9 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3-7 | 0-2 | 3-3 | 42.9% |
| 2026-02-12 | Purdue Fort Wayne | W 76–59 | 36:25 | 34 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 13-20 | 2-5 | 6-7 | 70.0% |
| 2026-02-07 | Detroit Mercy | W 76–63 | 14:45 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0-4 | 0-1 | 2-4 | 0.0% |
| 2026-02-04 | Northern Ky. | W 87–84 | 35:35 | 9 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 3-9 | 1-4 | 2-2 | 38.9% |
| 2026-02-01 | Wright St. | L 75–83 | 27:53 | 8 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3-5 | 1-1 | 1-2 | 70.0% |
| 2026-01-30 | Cleveland St. | L 82–89 | 26:11 | 13 | 6 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 5 | 4-10 | 0-4 | 5-6 | 40.0% |
| 2026-01-24 | Robert Morris | W 71–67 | 30:50 | 17 | 9 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 7-10 | 1-1 | 2-2 | 75.0% |
| 2026-01-22 | Youngstown St. | L 81–88 | 26:12 | 14 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 4-11 | 0-1 | 6-6 | 36.4% |
| 2026-01-18 | Oakland | L 63–88 | 21:56 | 9 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 4-9 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 50.0% |
| 2026-01-15 | Cleveland St. | W 88–73 | 34:10 | 13 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 5-12 | 1-5 | 2-2 | 45.8% |
| 2026-01-11 | Northern Ky. | W 80–78 | 31:19 | 27 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 10-17 | 2-6 | 5-7 | 64.7% |
| 2026-01-09 | IU Indy | W 75–59 | 15:50 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1-4 | 0-2 | 2-2 | 25.0% |
| 2026-01-05 | Milwaukee | W 79–76 | 35:38 | 21 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 9-15 | 0-1 | 3-4 | 60.0% |
| 2026-01-01 | Purdue Fort Wayne | W 72–54 | 34:40 | 21 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 6-10 | 1-3 | 8-8 | 65.0% |
| 2025-12-23 | Campbell | L 79–102 | 12:19 | 9 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 4-6 | 0-0 | 1-2 | 66.7% |
| 2025-12-17 · NCAA | UC Santa Barbara | W 67–64 | 21:06 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2-9 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 22.2% |
| 2025-12-11 | IU Indy | W 85–75 | 9:58 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1-4 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 37.5% |
| 2025-12-07 | Wright St. | L 58–86 | 27:44 | 12 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 5 | 5-11 | 0-2 | 2-2 | 45.5% |
| 2025-12-04 | Robert Morris | L 78–80 | 33:25 | 20 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 6-12 | 0-3 | 8-10 | 50.0% |
| 2025-11-24 | Iona | W 80–75 | 35:43 | 28 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 8-16 | 4-9 | 8-13 | 62.5% |
| 2025-11-22 | Massachusetts | W 79–75 | 29:33 | 27 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 7-13 | 1-3 | 12-12 | 57.7% |
| 2025-11-21 | Yale | L 67–73 | 25:14 | 7 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3-10 | 0-5 | 1-1 | 30.0% |
| 2025-11-15 | Minnesota | L 65–72 | 36:19 | 12 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5-13 | 0-4 | 2-3 | 38.5% |
| 2025-11-13 | St. Thomas (MN) | L 61–80 | 14:52 | 9 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 4-5 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 90.0% |
| 2025-11-03 | Kansas | L 51–94 | 5:18 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1-3 | 1-3 | 1-2 | 50.0% |