Tyler Betsey
Syracuse · 2025–26 · 31 available game logs · Speculative compensation · Model-implied values by season · Linked seasons and observed career performance
Logged performance
551:52 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 31
- Minutes per game
- 17:48
- Points per game
- 6.7
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 2.8 / 0.4
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 6.7 | 2.8 | 0.4 | 0.3 | 0.2 | 0.4 | 1.9 |
| Per 40 minutes | 15.0 | 6.3 | 0.8 | 0.7 | 0.4 | 0.9 | 4.2 |
| Season totals | 207 | 87 | 11 | 10 | 5 | 13 | 58 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 68–169 | 40.2% | 5.5 | 12.2 |
| 2P | 18–46 | 39.1%† | 1.5 | 3.3 |
| 3P | 50–123 | 40.7% | 4.0 | 8.9 |
| FT | 21–33 | 63.6% | 1.1 | 2.4 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 55.0% | 56.4% | 72.8% | 19.5% | 0.85 |
Accepted logged appearances only; absent games are not zeroes. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
Syracuse · Power 4 · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $170K
- 80% range $27K to $315K
- Median share of team pool
- 5.2%
- team pool $3.55M, 80% range $2.55M to $4.90M
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $170K in all four
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $25K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 42.2%
- Sufficient evidence
- Range driven by assumption, not data
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. House-settlement $20.5M cap (College Sports Commission, 2026-10-01) times a modelled utilisation of about 97 percent times a men's basketball share of about 18 percent (school statements and an industry study); Power 4 schools are at or near the cap nationally.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
Syracuse: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ
Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Syracuse | $170Kspeculative | $27K to $315K | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | -0.3 | -1.6 to +0.7 | Sufficient evidence | +0.9 | -1.2 | +2.4range +2.0 to +2.7 | 1,753 | Season detail | |
| 2025 | Cincinnati | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | -0.8 | -2.1 to +0.2 | Sufficient evidence | +0.0 | -0.9 | +1.1range +0.9 to +1.4 | 1,049 | Season detail |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology
Game log
| Measure | Graphic | Last five | Listed games | Range |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minutes | 19:24 | 17:48 | 6:33–29:48 | |
| Points | 6.2 | 6.7 | 0.0–18.0 | |
| Game eFG% | 49.0% | 55.3% | 0.0%–150.0% |
| Date | Opponent | Result | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF | FG | 3P | FT | eFG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-10 | SMU | L 69–86 | 28:05 | 15 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5-10 | 5-8 | 0-0 | 75.0% |
| 2026-03-07 | Pittsburgh | L 69–71 | 25:38 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1-5 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 30.0% |
| 2026-03-03 | Louisville | L 62–77 | 9:15 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0.0% |
| 2026-02-28 | Wake Forest | L 83–88 | 11:13 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1-3 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 50.0% |
| 2026-02-21 | North Carolina | L 64–77 | 22:51 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3-5 | 3-5 | 1-3 | 90.0% |
| 2026-02-16 | Duke | L 64–101 | 15:54 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2-8 | 1-5 | 0-0 | 31.3% |
| 2026-02-14 | SMU | W 79–78 | 16:47 | 8 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 3-8 | 2-7 | 0-0 | 50.0% |
| 2026-02-11 | California | W 107–100 | 13:22 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1-3 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 33.3% |
| 2026-02-07 | Virginia | L 59–72 | 16:30 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1-1 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 150.0% |
| 2026-02-02 | North Carolina | L 77–87 | 14:47 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0.0% |
| 2026-01-31 | Notre Dame | W 86–72 | 20:10 | 8 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3-6 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 66.7% |
| 2026-01-27 | NC State | L 68–88 | 20:05 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1-3 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 50.0% |
| 2026-01-24 | Miami (FL) | L 76–85 | 19:43 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1-3 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 50.0% |
| 2026-01-21 | Virginia Tech | L 74–76 | 18:04 | 9 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 2-3 | 2-3 | 3-3 | 100.0% |
| 2026-01-17 | Boston College | L 73–81 | 15:16 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0-2 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0.0% |
| 2026-01-13 | Florida St. | W 94–86 | 21:34 | 18 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 6-9 | 6-8 | 0-0 | 100.0% |
| 2026-01-10 | Pittsburgh | W 83–72 | 13:48 | 9 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3-4 | 3-4 | 0-0 | 112.5% |
| 2026-01-06 | Georgia Tech | W 82–72 | 8:13 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1-4 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 37.5% |
| 2025-12-31 | Clemson | L 61–64 | 15:12 | 8 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2-3 | 1-2 | 3-3 | 83.3% |
| 2025-12-22 | Stonehill | W 77–48 | 17:31 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 0-4 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0.0% |
| 2025-12-20 | Northeastern | W 91–83 | 23:36 | 14 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 4-6 | 1-2 | 5-6 | 75.0% |
| 2025-12-17 | Mercyhurst | W 76–62 | 14:43 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0-4 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0.0% |
| 2025-12-13 | Hofstra | L 69–70 | 18:37 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 2-5 | 1-4 | 0-0 | 50.0% |
| 2025-12-11 | Saint Joseph's | W 71–63 | 20:53 | 16 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 6-9 | 3-5 | 1-6 | 83.3% |
| 2025-12-02 | Tennessee | W 62–60 | 13:33 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1-3 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 33.3% |
| 2025-11-26 | Iowa St. | L 64–95 | 25:58 | 10 | 6 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3-14 | 2-10 | 2-2 | 28.6% |
| 2025-11-25 | Kansas | L 60–71 | 23:17 | 12 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 4-13 | 4-10 | 0-0 | 46.2% |
| 2025-11-24 | Houston | L 74–78 | 29:48 | 16 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 5-13 | 4-8 | 2-4 | 53.8% |
| 2025-11-15 | Drexel | W 80–50 | 6:33 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2-2 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 125.0% |
| 2025-11-08 | Delaware St. | W 83–43 | 15:48 | 7 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2-4 | 2-4 | 1-2 | 75.0% |
| 2025-11-03 | Binghamton | W 85–47 | 15:08 | 10 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3-10 | 1-7 | 3-4 | 35.0% |