Xzayvier Brown
Oklahoma · 2025–26 · 37 available game logs · Speculative compensation · Model-implied values by season · Linked seasons and observed career performance
Logged performance
1193:25 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 37
- Minutes per game
- 32:15
- Points per game
- 15.4
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 3.2 / 3.3
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 15.4 | 3.2 | 3.3 | 1.3 | 0.2 | 1.6 | 1.9 |
| Per 40 minutes | 19.1 | 4.0 | 4.1 | 1.6 | 0.2 | 2.0 | 2.4 |
| Season totals | 570 | 119 | 122 | 48 | 7 | 61 | 71 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 202–443 | 45.6% | 12.0 | 14.8 |
| 2P | 140–262 | 53.4% | 7.1 | 8.8 |
| 3P | 62–181 | 34.3% | 4.9 | 6.1 |
| FT | 104–119 | 87.4% | 3.2 | 4.0 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 52.6% | 57.5% | 40.9% | 26.9% | 2.00 |
Accepted logged appearances only; absent games are not zeroes. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
Oklahoma · Power 4 · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $330K
- 80% range $48K to $570K
- Median share of team pool
- 9.7%
- team pool $3.55M, 80% range $2.60M to $4.90M
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $330K in all four
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $27K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 79.9%
- Sufficient evidence
- Range driven by assumption, not data
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. House-settlement $20.5M cap (College Sports Commission, 2026-10-01) times a modelled utilisation of about 97 percent times a men's basketball share of about 18 percent (school statements and an industry study); Power 4 schools are at or near the cap nationally.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
Oklahoma: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ
Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Oklahoma | $330Kspeculative | $48K to $570K | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | +0.5 | -0.9 to +1.4 | Sufficient evidence | +2.1 | -1.7 | +5.9range +5.1 to +6.6 | 3,749 | Season detail | |
| 2025 | St Joseph's PA | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | +2.0 | +0.9 to +2.9 | Sufficient evidence | +1.8 | +0.2 | +5.4range +4.7 to +6.1 | 3,619 | Season detail | |
| 2024 | St Joseph's PA | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | +2.0 | +0.8 to +3.2 | Sufficient evidence | +2.4 | -0.4 | +4.4range +3.7 to +5.2 | 3,059 | Season detail |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology
Game log
| Measure | Graphic | Last five | Listed games | Range |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minutes | 35:01 | 32:15 | 25:02–40:02 | |
| Points | 14.2 | 15.4 | 0.0–24.0 | |
| Game eFG% | 37.9% | 53.5% | 0.0%–100.0% |
| Date | Opponent | Result | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF | FG | 3P | FT | eFG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-04-05 | West Virginia | L 82–89 | 40:02 | 13 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 1 | 6-15 | 0-4 | 1-2 | 40.0% |
| 2026-04-04 | Baylor | W 82–69 | 35:16 | 21 | 6 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 7-15 | 2-6 | 5-5 | 53.3% |
| 2026-04-01 | Colorado | W 90–86 | 38:18 | 17 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 5-14 | 1-7 | 6-8 | 39.3% |
| 2026-03-13 | Arkansas | L 79–82 | 30:01 | 4 | 7 | 8 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 2-10 | 0-3 | 0-0 | 20.0% |
| 2026-03-12 | Texas A&M | W 83–63 | 31:26 | 16 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 6-19 | 2-8 | 2-2 | 36.8% |
| 2026-03-11 | South Carolina | W 86–74 | 29:31 | 14 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 6-7 | 2-3 | 0-1 | 100.0% |
| 2026-03-07 | Texas | W 88–85 | 39:51 | 21 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 8-18 | 2-4 | 3-3 | 50.0% |
| 2026-03-03 | Missouri | W 80–64 | 30:53 | 12 | 2 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 4-8 | 2-4 | 2-5 | 62.5% |
| 2026-02-28 | LSU | W 83–67 | 31:59 | 20 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 6-10 | 2-3 | 6-6 | 70.0% |
| 2026-02-24 | Auburn | W 91–79 | 32:55 | 14 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 6-11 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 63.6% |
| 2026-02-21 | Texas A&M | L 71–75 | 29:10 | 10 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4-11 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 45.5% |
| 2026-02-18 | Tennessee | L 66–89 | 27:44 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 2-8 | 1-4 | 0-0 | 31.3% |
| 2026-02-14 | Georgia | W 94–78 | 30:21 | 5 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 2-8 | 0-2 | 1-2 | 25.0% |
| 2026-02-07 | Vanderbilt | W 92–91 | 27:45 | 20 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 8-12 | 2-5 | 2-2 | 75.0% |
| 2026-02-04 | Kentucky | L 78–94 | 30:23 | 21 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 6-11 | 5-9 | 4-4 | 77.3% |
| 2026-01-31 | Texas | L 69–79 | 34:24 | 15 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 6-16 | 3-8 | 0-0 | 46.9% |
| 2026-01-27 | Arkansas | L 79–83 | 37:25 | 13 | 6 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 6-15 | 1-5 | 0-0 | 43.3% |
| 2026-01-24 | Missouri | L 87–88 | 37:58 | 19 | 1 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 5-11 | 2-6 | 7-9 | 54.5% |
| 2026-01-20 | South Carolina | L 76–85 | 37:27 | 22 | 6 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 8-15 | 2-7 | 4-4 | 60.0% |
| 2026-01-17 | Alabama | L 81–83 | 37:57 | 21 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 6-17 | 1-4 | 8-9 | 38.2% |
| 2026-01-13 | Florida | L 79–96 | 37:20 | 24 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 7-13 | 3-5 | 7-8 | 65.4% |
| 2026-01-10 | Texas A&M | L 76–83 | 29:35 | 7 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 3-9 | 0-4 | 1-1 | 33.3% |
| 2026-01-07 | Mississippi St. | L 53–72 | 34:44 | 13 | 7 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 4-16 | 0-3 | 5-5 | 25.0% |
| 2026-01-03 | Ole Miss | W 86–70 | 25:02 | 23 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 8-11 | 4-5 | 3-3 | 90.9% |
| 2025-12-29 | Mississippi Val. | W 93–69 | 32:16 | 22 | 5 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 8-14 | 4-8 | 2-2 | 71.4% |
| 2025-12-22 | Stetson | W 107–54 | 25:54 | 18 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 7-9 | 2-3 | 2-2 | 88.9% |
| 2025-12-16 · NCAA | Kansas City | W 89–67 | 30:30 | 21 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 8-15 | 2-7 | 3-3 | 60.0% |
| 2025-12-13 | Oklahoma St. | W 85–76 | 32:06 | 21 | 3 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 6-9 | 3-5 | 6-6 | 83.3% |
| 2025-12-06 | Arizona St. | L 70–86 | 32:25 | 11 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 4-10 | 0-4 | 3-4 | 40.0% |
| 2025-12-02 | Wake Forest | W 86–68 | 32:23 | 11 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 3-11 | 0-6 | 5-6 | 27.3% |
| 2025-11-28 | Marquette | W 75–74 | 26:14 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0-9 | 0-4 | 0-0 | 0.0% |
| 2025-11-23 | Alcorn | W 72–53 | 26:10 | 11 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5-10 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 55.0% |
| 2025-11-20 | Oral Roberts | W 95–71 | 30:24 | 9 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4-9 | 1-4 | 0-0 | 50.0% |
| 2025-11-15 | Nebraska | L 99–105 | 35:17 | 20 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 6-10 | 4-8 | 4-4 | 80.0% |
| 2025-11-11 | Ark.-Pine Bluff | W 95–69 | 32:50 | 19 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 7-13 | 0-4 | 5-5 | 53.8% |
| 2025-11-08 | Gonzaga | L 68–83 | 30:46 | 21 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 3 | 8-14 | 2-4 | 3-4 | 64.3% |
| 2025-11-03 | Saint Francis | W 102–66 | 28:43 | 16 | 2 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 5-10 | 2-4 | 4-4 | 60.0% |