Nijel Pack
Oklahoma · 2025–26 · 37 available game logs · Speculative compensation · Model-implied values by season · Linked seasons and observed career performance
Logged performance
1126:56 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 37
- Minutes per game
- 30:27
- Points per game
- 16.8
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 3.0 / 3.2
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 16.8 | 3.0 | 3.2 | 0.7 | 0.3 | 1.8 | 2.1 |
| Per 40 minutes | 22.0 | 4.0 | 4.2 | 1.0 | 0.4 | 2.4 | 2.7 |
| Season totals | 621 | 112 | 119 | 27 | 11 | 68 | 77 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 222–471 | 47.1% | 12.7 | 16.7 |
| 2P | 99–196 | 50.5% | 5.3 | 7.0 |
| 3P | 123–275 | 44.7% | 7.4 | 9.8 |
| FT | 54–63 | 85.7% | 1.7 | 2.2 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 60.2% | 62.3% | 58.4% | 13.4% | 1.75 |
Accepted logged appearances only; absent games are not zeroes. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
Oklahoma · Power 4 · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $640K
- 80% range $405K to $1.05M
- Median share of team pool
- 17.4%
- team pool $3.55M, 80% range $2.60M to $4.90M
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $640K in all four
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $27K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 76.2%
- Sufficient evidence
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. House-settlement $20.5M cap (College Sports Commission, 2026-10-01) times a modelled utilisation of about 97 percent times a men's basketball share of about 18 percent (school statements and an industry study); Power 4 schools are at or near the cap nationally.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
Oklahoma: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ
Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Oklahoma | $640Kspeculative | $405K to $1.05M | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | +3.0 | +1.7 to +4.0 | Sufficient evidence | +3.3 | -0.3 | +6.9range +6.2 to +7.6 | 3,573 | Season detail | |
| 2022 | Kansas St | None: no budget that season | — | development: in model selection | +3.6 | +2.4 to +5.0 | Sufficient evidence | +2.2 | +1.5 | Not computed for this season | 2,826 | ||
| 2021 | Kansas St | None: no budget that season | — | development: in model selection | +0.2 | -1.1 to +1.3 | Sufficient evidence | +1.0 | -0.8 | Not computed for this season | 2,072 | 2020-21 season, shortened by COVID-19 cancellations; kept in the model fit with this flag. |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology
Game log
| Measure | Graphic | Last five | Listed games | Range |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minutes | 35:20 | 30:27 | 21:25–43:40 | |
| Points | 19.6 | 16.8 | 5.0–27.0 | |
| Game eFG% | 56.8% | 61.5% | 23.1%–100.0% |
| Date | Opponent | Result | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF | FG | 3P | FT | eFG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-04-05 | West Virginia | L 82–89 | 43:40 | 24 | 2 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 9-18 | 4-8 | 2-2 | 61.1% |
| 2026-04-04 | Baylor | W 82–69 | 32:32 | 15 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 6-13 | 3-7 | 0-0 | 57.7% |
| 2026-04-01 | Colorado | W 90–86 | 36:20 | 20 | 2 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 7-18 | 3-10 | 3-4 | 47.2% |
| 2026-03-13 | Arkansas | L 79–82 | 36:16 | 19 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 6-15 | 2-5 | 5-5 | 46.7% |
| 2026-03-12 | Texas A&M | W 83–63 | 27:54 | 20 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 8-14 | 4-10 | 0-0 | 71.4% |
| 2026-03-11 | South Carolina | W 86–74 | 30:20 | 24 | 1 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 7-14 | 5-10 | 5-6 | 67.9% |
| 2026-03-07 | Texas | W 88–85 | 31:33 | 23 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 7-14 | 3-7 | 6-8 | 60.7% |
| 2026-03-03 | Missouri | W 80–64 | 22:07 | 8 | 1 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3-5 | 2-4 | 0-1 | 80.0% |
| 2026-02-28 | LSU | W 83–67 | 30:16 | 21 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 8-14 | 5-11 | 0-0 | 75.0% |
| 2026-02-24 | Auburn | W 91–79 | 28:56 | 22 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 8-13 | 6-8 | 0-0 | 84.6% |
| 2026-02-21 | Texas A&M | L 71–75 | 28:48 | 6 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2-9 | 2-5 | 0-0 | 33.3% |
| 2026-02-18 | Tennessee | L 66–89 | 31:48 | 20 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 7-9 | 4-5 | 2-2 | 100.0% |
| 2026-02-14 | Georgia | W 94–78 | 30:42 | 18 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 6-10 | 4-6 | 2-2 | 80.0% |
| 2026-02-07 | Vanderbilt | W 92–91 | 34:14 | 17 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 6-14 | 3-7 | 2-2 | 53.6% |
| 2026-02-04 | Kentucky | L 78–94 | 26:18 | 6 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2-8 | 2-6 | 0-0 | 37.5% |
| 2026-01-31 | Texas | L 69–79 | 34:46 | 23 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 9-22 | 3-8 | 2-2 | 47.7% |
| 2026-01-27 | Arkansas | L 79–83 | 32:03 | 22 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 8-15 | 6-11 | 0-0 | 73.3% |
| 2026-01-24 | Missouri | L 87–88 | 35:53 | 25 | 4 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 8-13 | 5-8 | 4-4 | 80.8% |
| 2026-01-20 | South Carolina | L 76–85 | 30:48 | 9 | 7 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 3-13 | 0-7 | 3-3 | 23.1% |
| 2026-01-17 | Alabama | L 81–83 | 28:25 | 12 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 5-18 | 2-10 | 0-0 | 33.3% |
| 2026-01-13 | Florida | L 79–96 | 21:25 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 2-8 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 31.3% |
| 2026-01-10 | Texas A&M | L 76–83 | 31:04 | 24 | 6 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 8-20 | 6-13 | 2-2 | 55.0% |
| 2026-01-07 | Mississippi St. | L 53–72 | 30:10 | 11 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 5-12 | 1-5 | 0-0 | 45.8% |
| 2026-01-03 | Ole Miss | W 86–70 | 28:31 | 15 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 7-11 | 0-3 | 1-3 | 63.6% |
| 2025-12-29 | Mississippi Val. | W 93–69 | 28:13 | 13 | 3 | 7 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4-7 | 2-5 | 3-3 | 71.4% |
| 2025-12-22 | Stetson | W 107–54 | 25:44 | 11 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 4-8 | 3-5 | 0-0 | 68.8% |
| 2025-12-16 · NCAA | Kansas City | W 89–67 | 27:36 | 15 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 6-12 | 3-8 | 0-0 | 62.5% |
| 2025-12-13 | Oklahoma St. | W 85–76 | 30:17 | 18 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 6-14 | 4-9 | 2-2 | 57.1% |
| 2025-12-06 | Arizona St. | L 70–86 | 28:48 | 7 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 3-8 | 1-5 | 0-1 | 43.8% |
| 2025-12-02 | Wake Forest | W 86–68 | 27:27 | 13 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 4-8 | 3-6 | 2-3 | 68.8% |
| 2025-11-28 | Marquette | W 75–74 | 35:05 | 24 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 9-14 | 5-7 | 1-1 | 82.1% |
| 2025-11-23 | Alcorn | W 72–53 | 35:30 | 17 | 2 | 5 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 5-17 | 5-12 | 2-2 | 44.1% |
| 2025-11-20 | Oral Roberts | W 95–71 | 27:00 | 18 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 6-10 | 4-5 | 2-2 | 80.0% |
| 2025-11-15 | Nebraska | L 99–105 | 33:56 | 27 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 10-18 | 6-12 | 1-1 | 72.2% |
| 2025-11-11 | Ark.-Pine Bluff | W 95–69 | 23:37 | 15 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 5-8 | 5-7 | 0-0 | 93.8% |
| 2025-11-08 | Gonzaga | L 68–83 | 29:33 | 18 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 7-15 | 2-9 | 2-2 | 53.3% |
| 2025-11-03 | Saint Francis | W 102–66 | 29:21 | 16 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 6-12 | 4-9 | 0-0 | 66.7% |