TJ Power
Penn · 2025–26 · 29 available game logs · Speculative compensation · Model-implied values by season · Linked seasons and observed career performance
Logged performance
1027:46 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 29
- Minutes per game
- 35:26
- Points per game
- 16.8
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 7.6 / 2.4
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 16.8 | 7.6 | 2.4 | 1.1 | 0.6 | 2.2 | 2.1 |
| Per 40 minutes | 18.9 | 8.6 | 2.7 | 1.3 | 0.7 | 2.5 | 2.4 |
| Season totals | 486 | 220 | 70 | 33 | 18 | 63 | 62 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 174–381 | 45.7% | 13.1 | 14.8 |
| 2P | 95–203 | 46.8% | 7.0 | 7.9 |
| 3P | 79–178 | 44.4% | 6.1 | 6.9 |
| FT | 59–90 | 65.6% | 3.1 | 3.5 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 56.0% | 57.8% | 46.7% | 23.6% | 1.11 |
Accepted logged appearances only; absent games are not zeroes. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
Penn · Low and other · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $0 (assumed opted out)
- 80% range $0 to $0 (assumption, not data)
- Tier
- Low and other
- low evidence
This school did not opt in to House-settlement revenue sharing (Sportico, 2025-07-18), so its modelled pool is exactly zero. Other schools may also have opted out; they are treated as opted in. Assumption "opt-out list": one press article names schools that did not opt in; it is unverified and other schools may differ. Speculative, not observed pay.
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. Tier prior from anonymous surveys and sources, scaled so that all non-Power budgets sum to the national total the College Sports Commission reported paid for 2025-26 ($1,770,453,776 over 307 schools) less the Power 4 total, times a men's basketball share; weak anchor.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
Penn: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ
Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.
No modelled Team Pool (opted out). Enter a pool of your own.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Penn | $0 (assumed opted out) | 80% range $0 to $0 (assumption, not data) | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | +2.0 | +1.1 to +2.8 | Sufficient evidence | +0.7 | +1.3 | +6.3range +5.7 to +6.8 | 3,446 | Season detail | |
| 2025 | Virginia | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | -1.0 | -2.1 to +0.1 | Limited evidence | -1.1 | +0.1 | +0.6range +0.5 to +0.7 | 517 | Limited evidence: 300 to 599 on-court possessions. Season detail | |
| 2024 | Duke | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | +0.5 | -0.4 to +1.3 | Limited evidence | +0.8 | -0.3 | +0.5range +0.4 to +0.6 | 527 | Limited evidence: 300 to 599 on-court possessions. Season detail |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology
Game log
| Measure | Graphic | Last five | Listed games | Range |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minutes | 37:33 | 35:26 | 24:50–43:05 | |
| Points | 18.4 | 16.8 | 6.0–44.0 | |
| Game eFG% | 59.2% | 55.5% | 31.3%–77.3% |
| Date | Opponent | Result | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF | FG | 3P | FT | eFG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-19 | Illinois | L 70–105 | 29:37 | 6 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2-8 | 2-5 | 0-0 | 37.5% |
| 2026-03-15 | Yale | W 88–84 | 43:05 | 44 | 14 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 14-26 | 7-14 | 9-9 | 67.3% |
| 2026-03-14 | Harvard | W 62–60 | 42:57 | 16 | 12 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 6-13 | 3-8 | 1-2 | 57.7% |
| 2026-03-06 | Brown | W 82–61 | 33:52 | 17 | 8 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6-11 | 5-8 | 0-0 | 77.3% |
| 2026-02-28 | Harvard | W 64–61 | 38:12 | 9 | 9 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 2 | 3-8 | 3-6 | 0-0 | 56.3% |
| 2026-02-27 | Dartmouth | W 80–71 | 39:45 | 38 | 12 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 14-22 | 6-8 | 4-7 | 77.3% |
| 2026-02-21 | Yale | L 70–74 | 37:24 | 18 | 8 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 6-12 | 4-7 | 2-2 | 66.7% |
| 2026-02-14 | Cornell | W 82–76 | 36:09 | 17 | 8 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 7-14 | 2-7 | 1-1 | 57.1% |
| 2026-02-13 | Columbia | W 76–67 | 33:49 | 12 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 5-16 | 2-8 | 0-0 | 37.5% |
| 2026-02-07 | Princeton | W 61–60 | 36:10 | 18 | 7 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 6-11 | 3-6 | 3-6 | 68.2% |
| 2026-01-31 | Cornell | W 91–81 | 34:42 | 11 | 4 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 4-8 | 2-4 | 1-2 | 62.5% |
| 2026-01-30 | Columbia | L 67–72 | 37:41 | 23 | 7 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 8-20 | 5-12 | 2-5 | 52.5% |
| 2026-01-24 | Yale | L 60–77 | 35:18 | 12 | 7 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 4-14 | 2-7 | 2-2 | 35.7% |
| 2026-01-19 | Harvard | L 63–64 | 35:30 | 12 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 5-10 | 2-3 | 0-0 | 60.0% |
| 2026-01-17 | Dartmouth | W 84–74 | 27:12 | 27 | 8 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 10-17 | 3-5 | 4-6 | 67.6% |
| 2026-01-10 | Brown | W 81–73 | 37:28 | 9 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 4-8 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 56.3% |
| 2026-01-05 | Princeton | L 76–78 | 38:23 | 13 | 7 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 6-12 | 1-4 | 0-0 | 54.2% |
| 2025-12-31 | NJIT | W 80–61 | 39:37 | 13 | 11 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 4-16 | 2-9 | 3-4 | 31.3% |
| 2025-12-28 | George Mason | L 79–83 | 29:20 | 8 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 3-6 | 2-3 | 0-0 | 66.7% |
| 2025-12-20 | Rutgers | L 69–70 | 37:12 | 19 | 13 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 6 | 4 | 7-16 | 2-7 | 3-6 | 50.0% |
| 2025-12-08 | Lafayette | W 74–72 | 37:34 | 14 | 9 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 5-15 | 1-5 | 3-4 | 36.7% |
| 2025-12-06 | Villanova | L 63–90 | 27:27 | 11 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 4-10 | 3-6 | 0-3 | 55.0% |
| 2025-11-30 | Hofstra | L 60–77 | 29:03 | 10 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 3-10 | 2-5 | 2-2 | 40.0% |
| 2025-11-29 | La Salle | W 73–71 | 40:00 | 29 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 10-17 | 5-8 | 4-4 | 73.5% |
| 2025-11-28 | Merrimack | W 77–65 | 37:53 | 14 | 12 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 6-12 | 0-1 | 2-3 | 50.0% |
| 2025-11-21 | Drexel | W 84–68 | 37:03 | 18 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 5-11 | 1-4 | 7-10 | 50.0% |
| 2025-11-17 | Saint Joseph's | W 83–74 | 37:04 | 23 | 15 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 7-15 | 4-8 | 5-6 | 60.0% |
| 2025-11-11 | Providence | L 81–106 | 33:29 | 15 | 7 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 6-13 | 2-6 | 1-4 | 53.8% |
| 2025-11-09 | American | L 78–84 | 24:50 | 10 | 7 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 4-10 | 2-3 | 0-2 | 50.0% |