Hosana Kitenge
UC Santa Barbara · 2025–26 · 30 available game logs · Speculative compensation · Model-implied values by season · Linked seasons and observed career performance
Logged performance
643:17 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 30
- Minutes per game
- 21:27
- Points per game
- 7.6
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 4.5 / 1.8
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 7.6 | 4.5 | 1.8 | 0.8 | 0.6 | 2.2 | 3.7 |
| Per 40 minutes | 14.2 | 8.3 | 3.4 | 1.5 | 1.1 | 4.2 | 6.8 |
| Season totals | 228 | 134 | 54 | 24 | 18 | 67 | 110 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 93–166 | 56.0% | 5.5 | 10.3 |
| 2P | 91–159 | 57.2% | 5.3 | 9.9 |
| 3P | 2–7 | 28.6%† | 0.2 | 0.4 |
| FT | 40–66 | 60.6% | 2.2 | 4.1 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 56.6% | 58.4% | 4.2% | 39.8% | 0.81 |
Accepted logged appearances only; absent games are not zeroes. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
UC Santa Barbara · Low and other · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $27K
- 80% range $8K to $83K
- Median share of team pool
- 10.5%
- team pool $285K, 80% range $105K to $785K
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $26K to $30K
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $2K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 56.0%
- Sufficient evidence
- Range driven by assumption, not data
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. Tier prior from anonymous surveys and sources, scaled so that all non-Power budgets sum to the national total the College Sports Commission reported paid for 2025-26 ($1,770,453,776 over 307 schools) less the Power 4 total, times a men's basketball share; weak anchor.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
UC Santa Barbara: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ
Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | UC Santa Barbara | $27Kspeculative | $8K to $83K | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | +1.1 | +0.1 to +2.1 | Sufficient evidence | -1.0 | +2.0 | +4.3range +3.7 to +4.7 | 1,071 | Season detail | |
| 2024 | Louisiana | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | +4.4 | +3.3 to +5.7 | Sufficient evidence | +0.9 | +3.6 | +5.0range +4.3 to +5.7 | 2,412 | Season detail | |
| 2020 | Coastal Car | None: no budget that season | — | development: in model selection | -1.8 | -3.0 to -0.6 | Sufficient evidence | -0.4 | -1.4 | Not computed for this season | 825 |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology
Game log
| Measure | Graphic | Last five | Listed games | Range |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minutes | 24:04 | 21:27 | 12:11–33:48 | |
| Points | 7.8 | 7.6 | 2.0–16.0 | |
| Game eFG% | 70.0% | 58.9% | 0.0%–108.3% |
| Date | Opponent | Result | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF | FG | 3P | FT | eFG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-11 | UC Davis | L 73–79 | 25:47 | 15 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 6-6 | 0-0 | 3-4 | 100.0% |
| 2026-03-07 | UC San Diego | L 63–64 | 21:20 | 6 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 100.0% |
| 2026-02-28 | UC Irvine | L 60–64 | 21:51 | 2 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 1-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 20.0% |
| 2026-02-26 | UC Riverside | W 70–59 | 25:27 | 8 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4-8 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 50.0% |
| 2026-02-21 | Hawaii | L 75–78 | 25:53 | 8 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 5 | 4-5 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 80.0% |
| 2026-02-19 | CSUN | L 83–85 | 33:48 | 7 | 11 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 5-7 | 100.0% |
| 2026-02-14 · NCAA | Cal Poly | L 79–89 | 22:24 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 33.3% |
| 2026-02-12 | UC Riverside | W 76–68 | 26:21 | 8 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 4-10 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 40.0% |
| 2026-02-07 | UC Irvine | W 84–79 | 21:23 | 12 | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 3 | 6-10 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 60.0% |
| 2026-02-05 · NCAA | UC Davis | L 75–85 | 21:48 | 6 | 9 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 3-5 | 0-0 | 0-2 | 60.0% |
| 2026-01-31 · NCAA | Cal St. Fullerton | W 83–69 | 15:36 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 50.0% |
| 2026-01-29 | UC San Diego | W 62–48 | 17:46 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 1-3 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 33.3% |
| 2026-01-24 | Long Beach St. | W 74–71 | 12:11 | 7 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 2-3 | 0-0 | 3-4 | 66.7% |
| 2026-01-22 · NCAA | Cal Poly | W 107–67 | 18:06 | 6 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 3-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 100.0% |
| 2026-01-17 | Hawaii | W 77–62 | 22:14 | 12 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 6-6 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 100.0% |
| 2026-01-15 | CSU Bakersfield | W 75–69 | 20:31 | 8 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 3-5 | 0-0 | 2-3 | 60.0% |
| 2026-01-08 · NCAA | UC Davis | L 86–93 | 17:54 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 1-5 | 0-1 | 2-4 | 20.0% |
| 2026-01-03 · NCAA | CSUN | L 65–74 | 22:42 | 10 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 3-8 | 0-0 | 4-5 | 37.5% |
| 2026-01-01 · NCAA | Cal St. Fullerton | L 84–95 | 22:54 | 16 | 7 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 5 | 7-10 | 1-1 | 1-1 | 75.0% |
| 2025-12-22 · NCAA | Portland | W 79–61 | 17:12 | 14 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 6-6 | 1-1 | 1-1 | 108.3% |
| 2025-12-17 · NCAA | Green Bay | L 64–67 | 19:00 | 10 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 4-5 | 0-0 | 2-4 | 80.0% |
| 2025-12-13 · NCAA | Utah Valley | L 53–68 | 20:30 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 2-6 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 33.3% |
| 2025-12-06 · NCAA | CSU Bakersfield | W 109–84 | 18:00 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 2-4 | 0-1 | 2-3 | 50.0% |
| 2025-12-04 · NCAA | Long Beach St. | W 84–77 | 21:30 | 8 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 5 | 4-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 80.0% |
| 2025-11-29 · NCAA | Seattle U | W 74–71 | 25:54 | 4 | 6 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 0-3 | 0-0 | 4-4 | 0.0% |
| 2025-11-28 · NCAA | Lehigh | W 72–70 | 19:06 | 12 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 4-5 | 0-0 | 4-6 | 80.0% |
| 2025-11-22 | Nevada | L 64–77 | 17:27 | 12 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 5-7 | 0-0 | 2-6 | 71.4% |
| 2025-11-17 | LMU (CA) | L 74–78 | 25:10 | 2 | 7 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 5 | 1-9 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 11.1% |
| 2025-11-11 | Sacramento St. | W 92–87 | 21:43 | 5 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 2-7 | 0-0 | 1-2 | 28.6% |
| 2025-11-08 | San Jose St. | W 85–74 | 21:49 | 10 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 3-8 | 0-0 | 4-5 | 37.5% |