JJ Harper
Liberty · 2025–26 · 31 available game logs · Speculative compensation · Model-implied values by season · Linked seasons and observed career performance
Logged performance
843:31 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 31
- Minutes per game
- 27:13
- Points per game
- 10.7
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 2.7 / 1.4
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 10.7 | 2.7 | 1.4 | 1.2 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 2.9 |
| Per 40 minutes | 15.8 | 4.0 | 2.1 | 1.8 | 1.5 | 0.8 | 4.3 |
| Season totals | 333 | 85 | 44 | 38 | 31 | 17 | 90 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 121–208 | 58.2% | 6.7 | 9.9 |
| 2P | 96–138 | 69.6% | 4.5 | 6.5 |
| 3P | 25–70 | 35.7% | 2.3 | 3.3 |
| FT | 66–87 | 75.9% | 2.8 | 4.1 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 64.2% | 67.6% | 33.7% | 41.8% | 2.59 |
Accepted logged appearances only; absent games are not zeroes. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
Liberty · Low and other · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $45K
- 80% range $13K to $125K
- Median share of team pool
- 12.5%
- team pool $390K, 80% range $140K to $1.00M
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $42K to $47K
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $3K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 67.9%
- Sufficient evidence
- Range driven by assumption, not data
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. Tier prior from anonymous surveys and sources, scaled so that all non-Power budgets sum to the national total the College Sports Commission reported paid for 2025-26 ($1,770,453,776 over 307 schools) less the Power 4 total, times a men's basketball share; weak anchor.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
Liberty: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ
Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Liberty | $45Kspeculative | $13K to $125K | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | +1.7 | +0.5 to +3.1 | Sufficient evidence | +1.3 | +0.5 | +5.6range +4.9 to +6.4 | 2,740 | Season detail |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology
Game log
| Measure | Graphic | Last five | Listed games | Range |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minutes | 22:22 | 27:13 | 15:42–36:10 | |
| Points | 6.4 | 10.7 | 2.0–20.0 | |
| Game eFG% | 41.8% | 61.6% | 0.0%–100.0% |
| Date | Opponent | Result | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF | FG | 3P | FT | eFG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-21 | Nevada | L 63–73 | 34:15 | 14 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 6-11 | 1-4 | 1-1 | 59.1% |
| 2026-03-17 | George Mason | W 77–71 | 19:34 | 8 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 4 | 3-4 | 0-0 | 2-2 | 75.0% |
| 2026-03-11 | Missouri St. | L 69–77 | 16:08 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1-2 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 75.0% |
| 2026-03-07 | Sam Houston | W 79–72 | 16:00 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0-4 | 0-2 | 2-2 | 0.0% |
| 2026-03-05 | Louisiana Tech | L 71–76 | 25:55 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0-5 | 0-2 | 5-6 | 0.0% |
| 2026-02-28 | Jacksonville St. | W 81–78 | 24:09 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 2-4 | 0-2 | 1-2 | 50.0% |
| 2026-02-26 | Kennesaw St. | L 65–74 | 33:42 | 14 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 5-7 | 0-2 | 4-6 | 71.4% |
| 2026-02-21 | Western Ky. | L 73–94 | 27:37 | 16 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 6-7 | 1-2 | 3-7 | 92.9% |
| 2026-02-19 | FIU | W 90–89 | 36:10 | 16 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 6-9 | 2-3 | 2-5 | 77.8% |
| 2026-02-14 | UTEP | W 73–64 | 30:05 | 18 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 8-11 | 2-4 | 0-1 | 81.8% |
| 2026-02-11 | New Mexico St. | W 77–75 | 32:15 | 19 | 1 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 7-11 | 2-4 | 3-3 | 72.7% |
| 2026-02-07 | Missouri St. | W 79–76 | 15:42 | 7 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 3-4 | 0-0 | 1-2 | 75.0% |
| 2026-02-04 | Delaware | W 75–69 | 25:10 | 13 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4-6 | 0-1 | 5-5 | 66.7% |
| 2026-01-29 | Middle Tenn. | W 81–65 | 32:54 | 13 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 5-8 | 0-1 | 3-4 | 62.5% |
| 2026-01-24 | Delaware | W 67–51 | 27:11 | 10 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 4-8 | 0-0 | 2-4 | 50.0% |
| 2026-01-21 | Western Ky. | W 76–69 | 29:50 | 16 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4-6 | 3-5 | 5-7 | 91.7% |
| 2026-01-17 | UTEP | W 80–69 | 30:59 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2-7 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 28.6% |
| 2026-01-15 | New Mexico St. | W 73–71 | 34:22 | 17 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 6-7 | 2-3 | 3-3 | 100.0% |
| 2026-01-10 | Sam Houston | W 82–74 | 25:53 | 20 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 7-10 | 3-5 | 3-4 | 85.0% |
| 2026-01-08 | Louisiana Tech | W 72–56 | 27:48 | 13 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4-7 | 1-4 | 4-4 | 64.3% |
| 2026-01-04 | Jacksonville St. | W 78–69 | 28:06 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 1-4 | 0-1 | 1-2 | 25.0% |
| 2026-01-02 | Kennesaw St. | W 81–73 | 26:06 | 12 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 4-7 | 1-3 | 3-4 | 64.3% |
| 2025-12-28 | FIU | W 97–94 | 16:48 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 2-5 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 40.0% |
| 2025-12-20 | Dayton | W 64–61 | 34:45 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1-5 | 0-1 | 2-2 | 20.0% |
| 2025-12-10 | NC State | L 45–85 | 29:48 | 12 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 6-9 | 0-3 | 0-0 | 66.7% |
| 2025-12-06 | Coppin St. | W 92–50 | 21:42 | 16 | 7 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 5-7 | 3-4 | 3-3 | 92.9% |
| 2025-11-26 | Bradley | L 64–74 | 25:11 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 3-8 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 43.8% |
| 2025-11-25 | Towson | L 69–72 | 33:06 | 14 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 5-8 | 0-2 | 4-4 | 62.5% |
| 2025-11-24 | Vermont | W 79–73 | 30:19 | 7 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 3-7 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 50.0% |
| 2025-11-09 | Fla. Atlantic | W 88–68 | 32:51 | 13 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 5-6 | 1-2 | 2-2 | 91.7% |
| 2025-11-07 | Col. of Charleston | W 90–75 | 19:10 | 8 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 3-4 | 0-0 | 2-2 | 75.0% |