Wei Lin
Oregon · 2025–26 · 30 available game logs · Speculative compensation · Model-implied values by season · Linked seasons and observed career performance
Logged performance
525:11 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 30
- Minutes per game
- 17:30
- Points per game
- 6.6
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 0.9 / 1.7
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 6.6 | 0.9 | 1.7 | 0.4 | 0.0 | 1.2 | 1.4 |
| Per 40 minutes | 15.0 | 2.1 | 3.8 | 0.8 | 0.0 | 2.7 | 3.1 |
| Season totals | 197 | 27 | 50 | 11 | 0 | 35 | 41 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 62–180 | 34.4% | 6.0 | 13.7 |
| 2P | 31–75 | 41.3%† | 2.5 | 5.7 |
| 3P | 31–105 | 29.5% | 3.5 | 8.0 |
| FT | 42–51 | 82.4% | 1.7 | 3.9 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 43.1% | 48.7% | 58.3% | 28.3% | 1.43 |
Accepted logged appearances only; absent games are not zeroes. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
Oregon · Power 4 · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $85K
- 80% range $17K to $250K
- Median share of team pool
- 2.6%
- team pool $3.55M, 80% range $2.55M to $4.95M
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $85K in all four
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $23K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 40.7%
- Sufficient evidence
- Range driven by assumption, not data
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. House-settlement $20.5M cap (College Sports Commission, 2026-10-01) times a modelled utilisation of about 97 percent times a men's basketball share of about 18 percent (school statements and an industry study); Power 4 schools are at or near the cap nationally.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
Oregon: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ
Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Oregon | $85Kspeculative | $17K to $250K | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | -1.7 | -3.1 to -0.4 | Sufficient evidence | -0.2 | -1.6 | +1.9range +1.6 to +2.3 | 1,685 | Season detail |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology
Game log
| Measure | Graphic | Last five | Listed games | Range |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minutes | 13:29 | 17:30 | 5:37–37:46 | |
| Points | 6.2 | 6.6 | 0.0–23.0 | |
| Game eFG% | 45.9% | 39.5% | 0.0%–87.5% |
| Date | Opponent | Result | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF | FG | 3P | FT | eFG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-10 | Maryland | L 60–70 | 11:15 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1-2 | 1-2 | 2-2 | 75.0% |
| 2026-03-07 | Washington | W 85–79 | 16:33 | 7 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2-6 | 2-4 | 1-2 | 50.0% |
| 2026-02-28 | Northwestern | L 62–63 | 14:21 | 6 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2-7 | 1-3 | 1-2 | 35.7% |
| 2026-02-25 | Wisconsin | W 85–71 | 19:41 | 13 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 5-8 | 1-2 | 2-2 | 68.8% |
| 2026-02-21 | Southern California | W 71–70 | 5:37 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0.0% |
| 2026-02-17 | Minnesota | L 44–61 | 23:48 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1-4 | 0-3 | 0-0 | 25.0% |
| 2026-02-14 | Penn St. | W 83–72 | 20:58 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 1-4 | 1-2 | 2-2 | 37.5% |
| 2026-02-09 | Indiana | L 74–92 | 21:16 | 15 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 6-12 | 3-5 | 0-0 | 62.5% |
| 2026-02-07 | Purdue | L 64–68 | 17:45 | 7 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 3-8 | 1-5 | 0-0 | 43.8% |
| 2026-02-01 | Iowa | L 66–84 | 11:34 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2-4 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 62.5% |
| 2026-01-28 | UCLA | L 57–73 | 20:26 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1-6 | 0-4 | 1-2 | 16.7% |
| 2026-01-25 | Washington | L 57–72 | 15:02 | 9 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1-4 | 1-2 | 6-6 | 37.5% |
| 2026-01-20 | Michigan St. | L 52–68 | 23:51 | 7 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 2-5 | 2-5 | 1-2 | 60.0% |
| 2026-01-17 | Michigan | L 71–81 | 32:32 | 11 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2-12 | 1-7 | 6-6 | 20.8% |
| 2026-01-13 | Nebraska | L 55–90 | 27:30 | 14 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 4-9 | 3-6 | 3-3 | 61.1% |
| 2026-01-08 | Ohio St. | L 62–72 | 37:46 | 10 | 1 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 4-14 | 1-10 | 1-1 | 32.1% |
| 2026-01-05 | Rutgers | L 85–88 | 32:36 | 23 | 1 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 8-14 | 6-12 | 1-2 | 78.6% |
| 2026-01-02 | Maryland | W 64–54 | 22:01 | 8 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 2-5 | 1-2 | 3-3 | 50.0% |
| 2025-12-28 | Omaha | W 80–57 | 14:50 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2-6 | 1-4 | 0-0 | 41.7% |
| 2025-12-21 | Gonzaga | L 82–91 | 16:25 | 9 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3-4 | 1-1 | 2-2 | 87.5% |
| 2025-12-17 | Portland | W 94–69 | 20:34 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1-5 | 0-2 | 1-2 | 20.0% |
| 2025-12-13 | UC Davis | W 104–62 | 20:13 | 8 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3-7 | 1-3 | 1-2 | 50.0% |
| 2025-12-06 | UCLA | L 63–74 | 6:20 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1-2 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 50.0% |
| 2025-12-02 | Southern California | L 77–82 | 7:12 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0-2 | 0-1 | 1-2 | 0.0% |
| 2025-11-25 | San Diego St. | L 80–97 | 9:59 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2-7 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 35.7% |
| 2025-11-24 | Auburn | L 73–84 | 9:09 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2-4 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 62.5% |
| 2025-11-17 | Oregon St. | W 87–75 | 7:34 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 2-2 | 0.0% |
| 2025-11-12 | South Dakota St. | W 83–69 | 8:13 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1-5 | 0-4 | 0-0 | 20.0% |
| 2025-11-07 | Rice | W 67–63 | 12:47 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0-5 | 0-2 | 3-4 | 0.0% |
| 2025-11-04 | Hawaii | W 60–59 | 17:23 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 0-7 | 0-4 | 2-2 | 0.0% |