Owen Aquino
High Point · 2025–26 · 33 available game logs · Speculative compensation · Model-implied values by season · Linked seasons and observed career performance
Logged performance
907:25 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 33
- Minutes per game
- 27:30
- Points per game
- 9.3
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 6.0 / 2.5
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 9.3 | 6.0 | 2.5 | 1.2 | 1.7 | 1.8 | 2.8 |
| Per 40 minutes | 13.6 | 8.7 | 3.7 | 1.8 | 2.5 | 2.6 | 4.0 |
| Season totals | 308 | 197 | 83 | 40 | 56 | 58 | 91 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 111–208 | 53.4% | 6.3 | 9.2 |
| 2P | 96–174 | 55.2% | 5.3 | 7.7 |
| 3P | 15–34 | 44.1%† | 1.0 | 1.5 |
| FT | 71–110 | 64.5% | 3.3 | 4.8 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 57.0% | 60.1% | 16.3% | 52.9% | 1.43 |
Accepted logged appearances only; absent games are not zeroes. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
High Point · Low and other · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $33K
- 80% range $11K to $91K
- Median share of team pool
- 12.5%
- team pool $290K, 80% range $110K to $750K
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $31K to $38K
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $2K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 70.5%
- Sufficient evidence
- Range driven by assumption, not data
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. Tier prior from anonymous surveys and sources, scaled so that all non-Power budgets sum to the national total the College Sports Commission reported paid for 2025-26 ($1,770,453,776 over 307 schools) less the Power 4 total, times a men's basketball share; weak anchor.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
High Point: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ
Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | High Point | $33Kspeculative | $11K to $91K | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | +2.5 | +1.4 to +3.6 | Sufficient evidence | +1.5 | +1.0 | +4.5range +3.9 to +5.1 | 3,138 | Season detail | |
| 2025 | Liberty | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | +0.9 | -0.4 to +2.2 | Sufficient evidence | -0.7 | +1.6 | +3.5range +2.9 to +4.2 | 2,686 | Season detail |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology
Game log
| Measure | Graphic | Last five | Listed games | Range |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minutes | 27:40 | 27:30 | 16:07–38:33 | |
| Points | 7.6 | 9.3 | 2.0–18.0 | |
| Game eFG% | 55.8% | 63.8% | 25.0%–125.0% |
| Date | Opponent | Result | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF | FG | 3P | FT | eFG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-21 | Arkansas | L 88–94 | 31:30 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1-4 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 25.0% |
| 2026-03-19 | Wisconsin | W 83–82 | 36:09 | 11 | 6 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 3-8 | 1-2 | 4-4 | 43.8% |
| 2026-03-08 | Winthrop | W 91–76 | 30:27 | 11 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 3-8 | 1-2 | 4-4 | 43.8% |
| 2026-03-07 | UNC Asheville | W 75–71 | 19:39 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 100.0% |
| 2026-03-06 | Gardner-Webb | W 81–59 | 20:36 | 10 | 9 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 4-6 | 0-0 | 2-3 | 66.7% |
| 2026-02-26 | Presbyterian | W 79–73 | 35:14 | 12 | 7 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 5-9 | 2-2 | 0-2 | 66.7% |
| 2026-02-21 | Winthrop | W 89–87 | 26:53 | 12 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 3-4 | 1-2 | 5-6 | 87.5% |
| 2026-02-19 | UNC Asheville | W 74–48 | 24:31 | 9 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 3-7 | 1-3 | 2-2 | 50.0% |
| 2026-02-14 | Gardner-Webb | W 112–87 | 30:10 | 11 | 9 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 4-4 | 2-2 | 1-2 | 125.0% |
| 2026-02-12 | USC Upstate | W 95–70 | 27:21 | 12 | 10 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4-7 | 2-3 | 2-4 | 71.4% |
| 2026-02-07 | Radford | W 86–77 | 35:47 | 17 | 12 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 6-11 | 0-0 | 5-7 | 54.5% |
| 2026-02-04 | Charleston So. | W 80–55 | 25:20 | 18 | 8 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 6-13 | 0-2 | 6-8 | 46.2% |
| 2026-01-31 | Longwood | W 71–59 | 31:17 | 12 | 7 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 6-9 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 66.7% |
| 2026-01-29 | Presbyterian | W 84–81 | 30:52 | 13 | 7 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4-12 | 0-2 | 5-7 | 33.3% |
| 2026-01-23 | Radford | W 93–83 | 38:33 | 9 | 2 | 8 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 2-4 | 1-1 | 4-6 | 62.5% |
| 2026-01-17 | USC Upstate | W 89–69 | 22:15 | 8 | 5 | 7 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 4 | 4-6 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 66.7% |
| 2026-01-14 | Winthrop | L 75–92 | 23:32 | 9 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 3-7 | 0-1 | 3-5 | 42.9% |
| 2026-01-10 | Charleston So. | W 84–82 | 23:57 | 14 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 5-10 | 1-2 | 3-4 | 55.0% |
| 2026-01-07 | Gardner-Webb | W 104–49 | 19:29 | 3 | 9 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1-4 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 37.5% |
| 2026-01-03 | Longwood | W 80–67 | 35:39 | 15 | 8 | 3 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 6-7 | 1-1 | 2-2 | 92.9% |
| 2025-12-31 | UNC Asheville | W 87–69 | 16:41 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 1-2 | 100.0% |
| 2025-12-22 | Bryant | W 93–47 | 16:07 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 50.0% |
| 2025-12-19 | La Salle | W 84–72 | 32:41 | 10 | 8 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 3-4 | 1-1 | 3-4 | 87.5% |
| 2025-12-14 | App State | L 78–86 | 20:00 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 3-6 | 0-1 | 2-5 | 50.0% |
| 2025-12-05 | NJIT | W 89–72 | 28:38 | 8 | 9 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 4-5 | 100.0% |
| 2025-12-03 | Southern Ill. | L 84–86 | 31:34 | 8 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 3-6 | 0-0 | 2-3 | 50.0% |
| 2025-11-29 | Western Caro. | W 93–73 | 30:18 | 7 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 3-6 | 0-0 | 1-3 | 50.0% |
| 2025-11-22 | UIW | W 91–80 | 26:48 | 11 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 3-8 | 0-1 | 5-9 | 37.5% |
| 2025-11-20 | UIC | W 90–80 | 29:51 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 100.0% |
| 2025-11-17 | Canisius | W 93–50 | 20:14 | 4 | 7 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 100.0% |
| 2025-11-14 | UAB | L 74–91 | 34:12 | 10 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 3 | 5-12 | 0-0 | 0-2 | 41.7% |
| 2025-11-11 | Jacksonville | W 85–64 | 19:54 | 4 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 2-5 | 0-0 | 0-2 | 40.0% |
| 2025-11-03 | Furman | W 97–71 | 31:16 | 17 | 6 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 6-10 | 0-1 | 5-7 | 60.0% |