Kenny Noland
Columbia · 2025–26 · 26 available game logs · Speculative compensation · Model-implied values by season · Linked seasons and observed career performance
Logged performance
890:01 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 26
- Minutes per game
- 34:14
- Points per game
- 17.7
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 3.5 / 3.6
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 17.7 | 3.5 | 3.6 | 1.4 | 0.0 | 2.6 | 1.4 |
| Per 40 minutes | 20.7 | 4.1 | 4.2 | 1.7 | 0.0 | 3.0 | 1.6 |
| Season totals | 461 | 91 | 94 | 37 | 1 | 67 | 36 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 161–362 | 44.5% | 13.9 | 16.3 |
| 2P | 92–179 | 51.4% | 6.9 | 8.0 |
| 3P | 69–183 | 37.7% | 7.0 | 8.2 |
| FT | 70–76 | 92.1% | 2.9 | 3.4 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 54.0% | 58.3% | 50.6% | 21.0% | 1.40 |
Accepted logged appearances only; absent games are not zeroes. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
Columbia · Low and other · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $0 (assumed opted out)
- 80% range $0 to $0 (assumption, not data)
- Tier
- Low and other
- low evidence
This school did not opt in to House-settlement revenue sharing (Sportico, 2025-07-18), so its modelled pool is exactly zero. Other schools may also have opted out; they are treated as opted in. Assumption "opt-out list": one press article names schools that did not opt in; it is unverified and other schools may differ. Speculative, not observed pay.
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. Tier prior from anonymous surveys and sources, scaled so that all non-Power budgets sum to the national total the College Sports Commission reported paid for 2025-26 ($1,770,453,776 over 307 schools) less the Power 4 total, times a men's basketball share; weak anchor.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
Columbia: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ
Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.
No modelled Team Pool (opted out). Enter a pool of your own.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Columbia | $0 (assumed opted out) | 80% range $0 to $0 (assumption, not data) | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | +1.3 | +0.4 to +2.2 | Sufficient evidence | +1.4 | -0.1 | +5.5range +4.9 to +6.0 | 2,893 | Season detail | |
| 2025 | Columbia | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | -0.5 | -1.3 to +0.3 | Sufficient evidence | +0.7 | -1.2 | +2.9range +2.5 to +3.4 | 2,813 | Season detail | |
| 2024 | Columbia | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | +0.2 | -0.8 to +1.1 | Sufficient evidence | +0.8 | -0.6 | +1.4range +1.2 to +1.7 | 1,100 | Season detail | |
| 2023 | Columbia | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | -0.8 | -2.2 to +0.5 | Sufficient evidence | -0.9 | +0.2 | +1.0range +0.7 to +1.3 | 1,373 | Season detail |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology
Game log
| Measure | Graphic | Last five | Listed games | Range |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minutes | 38:07 | 34:14 | 24:45–39:54 | |
| Points | 17.2 | 17.7 | 5.0–28.0 | |
| Game eFG% | 50.0% | 53.3% | 20.8%–78.6% |
| Date | Opponent | Result | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF | FG | 3P | FT | eFG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-06 | Harvard | L 71–81 | 37:53 | 17 | 3 | 7 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 8-20 | 1-7 | 0-0 | 42.5% |
| 2026-02-28 | Yale | L 54–60 | 39:54 | 20 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 7-18 | 3-11 | 3-3 | 47.2% |
| 2026-02-27 | Brown | W 80–62 | 39:45 | 23 | 1 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 8-14 | 3-6 | 4-4 | 67.9% |
| 2026-02-21 | Dartmouth | L 63–64 | 36:40 | 17 | 5 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 7-20 | 3-10 | 0-0 | 42.5% |
| 2026-02-14 | Princeton | W 75–65 | 36:23 | 9 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3-8 | 2-6 | 1-4 | 50.0% |
| 2026-02-13 | Penn | L 67–76 | 38:43 | 22 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 8-14 | 6-9 | 0-0 | 78.6% |
| 2026-02-07 | Cornell | L 67–88 | 30:40 | 21 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 9-14 | 3-5 | 0-0 | 75.0% |
| 2026-01-31 | Princeton | L 68–80 | 38:05 | 20 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8-20 | 3-11 | 1-1 | 47.5% |
| 2026-01-30 | Penn | W 72–67 | 35:44 | 7 | 9 | 8 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 3-10 | 1-4 | 0-0 | 35.0% |
| 2026-01-24 | Dartmouth | W 79–69 | 39:37 | 28 | 11 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 7-19 | 3-9 | 11-11 | 44.7% |
| 2026-01-19 | Yale | L 74–91 | 32:38 | 13 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5-13 | 1-6 | 2-2 | 42.3% |
| 2026-01-17 | Brown | L 80–86 | 32:29 | 18 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 5 | 7-12 | 3-6 | 1-2 | 70.8% |
| 2026-01-10 | Harvard | L 54–79 | 31:45 | 10 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 4-14 | 0-4 | 2-2 | 28.6% |
| 2026-01-05 | Cornell | W 104–99 | 37:25 | 23 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 5 | 1 | 8-13 | 3-6 | 4-5 | 73.1% |
| 2025-12-28 | North Florida | W 90–82 | 33:03 | 27 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 9-15 | 4-7 | 5-6 | 73.3% |
| 2025-12-21 | California | L 56–74 | 34:21 | 5 | 7 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 2-12 | 1-6 | 0-0 | 20.8% |
| 2025-12-09 | Stony Brook | L 73–77 | 38:49 | 24 | 4 | 9 | 3 | 0 | 5 | 4 | 6-14 | 3-9 | 9-9 | 53.6% |
| 2025-12-06 | UAlbany | W 93–65 | 30:56 | 16 | 5 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 5-12 | 0-4 | 6-6 | 41.7% |
| 2025-12-03 | Hofstra | W 72–70 | 35:24 | 19 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 6-12 | 5-8 | 2-2 | 70.8% |
| 2025-11-26 | Fairfield | W 106–77 | 25:35 | 20 | 1 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 6-11 | 2-4 | 6-6 | 63.6% |
| 2025-11-23 | Longwood | W 95–70 | 30:39 | 24 | 3 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 8-14 | 6-11 | 2-2 | 78.6% |
| 2025-11-21 | Lehigh | W 82–67 | 33:03 | 27 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 11-18 | 5-10 | 0-0 | 75.0% |
| 2025-11-18 | Boston U. | W 54–49 | 34:18 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 1-7 | 1-5 | 2-2 | 21.4% |
| 2025-11-13 | UMass Lowell | W 86–72 | 32:42 | 24 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 7-15 | 4-8 | 6-6 | 60.0% |
| 2025-11-10 | UConn | L 62–89 | 28:45 | 8 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3-11 | 1-5 | 1-1 | 31.8% |
| 2025-11-07 | New Haven | W 71–53 | 24:45 | 14 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 5-12 | 2-6 | 2-2 | 50.0% |