Blair Thompson
Columbia · 2025–26 · 26 available game logs · Speculative compensation · Model-implied values by season · Linked seasons and observed career performance
Logged performance
830:18 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 26
- Minutes per game
- 31:56
- Points per game
- 11.5
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 4.7 / 1.2
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 11.5 | 4.7 | 1.2 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 0.8 | 2.0 |
| Per 40 minutes | 14.4 | 5.9 | 1.4 | 1.3 | 0.6 | 1.0 | 2.6 |
| Season totals | 299 | 123 | 30 | 27 | 12 | 21 | 53 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 110–219 | 50.2% | 8.4 | 10.6 |
| 2P | 69–115 | 60.0% | 4.4 | 5.5 |
| 3P | 41–104 | 39.4% | 4.0 | 5.0 |
| FT | 38–60 | 63.3% | 2.3 | 2.9 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 59.6% | 60.9% | 47.5% | 27.4% | 1.43 |
Accepted logged appearances only; absent games are not zeroes. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
Columbia · Low and other · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $0 (assumed opted out)
- 80% range $0 to $0 (assumption, not data)
- Tier
- Low and other
- low evidence
This school did not opt in to House-settlement revenue sharing (Sportico, 2025-07-18), so its modelled pool is exactly zero. Other schools may also have opted out; they are treated as opted in. Assumption "opt-out list": one press article names schools that did not opt in; it is unverified and other schools may differ. Speculative, not observed pay.
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. Tier prior from anonymous surveys and sources, scaled so that all non-Power budgets sum to the national total the College Sports Commission reported paid for 2025-26 ($1,770,453,776 over 307 schools) less the Power 4 total, times a men's basketball share; weak anchor.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
Columbia: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ
Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.
No modelled Team Pool (opted out). Enter a pool of your own.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Columbia | $0 (assumed opted out) | 80% range $0 to $0 (assumption, not data) | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | -0.5 | -1.7 to +0.6 | Sufficient evidence | +0.8 | -1.3 | +4.3range +3.6 to +4.9 | 2,718 | Season detail | |
| 2025 | Columbia | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | -0.6 | -1.7 to +0.4 | Sufficient evidence | +0.2 | -0.9 | +2.0range +1.7 to +2.5 | 2,020 | Season detail | |
| 2024 | Columbia | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | -0.6 | -1.7 to +0.3 | Sufficient evidence | +0.2 | -0.9 | +1.9range +1.4 to +2.3 | 1,680 | Season detail | |
| 2023 | Columbia | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | -1.2 | -2.2 to +0.2 | Sufficient evidence | -0.6 | -0.5 | +1.2range +0.9 to +1.5 | 1,721 | Season detail |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology
Game log
| Measure | Graphic | Last five | Listed games | Range |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minutes | 33:04 | 31:56 | 22:25–38:24 | |
| Points | 13.8 | 11.5 | 0.0–26.0 | |
| Game eFG% | 62.7% | 57.4% | 0.0%–96.2% |
| Date | Opponent | Result | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF | FG | 3P | FT | eFG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-06 | Harvard | L 71–81 | 38:24 | 18 | 8 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 8-14 | 0-3 | 2-2 | 57.1% |
| 2026-02-28 | Yale | L 54–60 | 30:50 | 7 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 3-10 | 0-4 | 1-1 | 30.0% |
| 2026-02-27 | Brown | W 80–62 | 29:53 | 17 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 7-10 | 2-4 | 1-2 | 80.0% |
| 2026-02-21 | Dartmouth | L 63–64 | 35:23 | 13 | 8 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 5-11 | 3-5 | 0-0 | 59.1% |
| 2026-02-14 | Princeton | W 75–65 | 30:52 | 14 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 6-8 | 2-3 | 0-0 | 87.5% |
| 2026-02-13 | Penn | L 67–76 | 31:12 | 11 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 5-10 | 0-5 | 1-4 | 50.0% |
| 2026-02-07 | Cornell | L 67–88 | 34:12 | 9 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 3-7 | 2-3 | 1-2 | 57.1% |
| 2026-01-31 | Princeton | L 68–80 | 30:05 | 7 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 3-6 | 1-4 | 0-1 | 58.3% |
| 2026-01-30 | Penn | W 72–67 | 36:50 | 16 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 7-11 | 2-5 | 0-0 | 72.7% |
| 2026-01-24 | Dartmouth | W 79–69 | 36:25 | 10 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 4-10 | 2-6 | 0-0 | 50.0% |
| 2026-01-19 | Yale | L 74–91 | 35:50 | 9 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 3-7 | 1-5 | 2-4 | 50.0% |
| 2026-01-17 | Brown | L 80–86 | 37:06 | 12 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 4-9 | 3-4 | 1-2 | 61.1% |
| 2026-01-10 | Harvard | L 54–79 | 33:29 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2-6 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 41.7% |
| 2026-01-05 | Cornell | W 104–99 | 35:43 | 26 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 6-10 | 2-5 | 12-12 | 70.0% |
| 2025-12-28 | North Florida | W 90–82 | 28:53 | 12 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3-6 | 1-3 | 5-6 | 58.3% |
| 2025-12-21 | California | L 56–74 | 29:40 | 7 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 3-5 | 1-3 | 0-1 | 70.0% |
| 2025-12-09 | Stony Brook | L 73–77 | 38:04 | 8 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 3-9 | 1-6 | 1-4 | 38.9% |
| 2025-12-06 | UAlbany | W 93–65 | 25:41 | 9 | 12 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3-8 | 1-3 | 2-4 | 43.8% |
| 2025-12-03 | Hofstra | W 72–70 | 33:46 | 11 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 3-6 | 1-2 | 4-7 | 58.3% |
| 2025-11-26 | Fairfield | W 106–77 | 27:53 | 23 | 6 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 9-12 | 4-6 | 1-1 | 91.7% |
| 2025-11-23 | Longwood | W 95–70 | 28:42 | 25 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 9-13 | 7-9 | 0-0 | 96.2% |
| 2025-11-21 | Lehigh | W 82–67 | 30:01 | 11 | 10 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 3-7 | 1-4 | 4-4 | 50.0% |
| 2025-11-18 | Boston U. | W 54–49 | 28:58 | 6 | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3-5 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 60.0% |
| 2025-11-13 | UMass Lowell | W 86–72 | 29:56 | 0 | 7 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0-7 | 0-2 | 0-2 | 0.0% |
| 2025-11-10 | UConn | L 62–89 | 30:05 | 10 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4-8 | 2-4 | 0-1 | 62.5% |
| 2025-11-07 | New Haven | W 71–53 | 22:25 | 3 | 6 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1-4 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 37.5% |