Melo Baines
Norfolk St. · 2025–26 · 25 available game logs · Speculative compensation · Model-implied values by season · Linked seasons and observed career performance
Logged performance
250:17 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 25
- Minutes per game
- 10:01
- Points per game
- 3.1
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 1.6 / 0.0
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 3.1 | 1.6 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.5 | 1.8 |
| Per 40 minutes | 12.5 | 6.2 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.3 | 2.1 | 7.0 |
| Season totals | 78 | 39 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 13 | 44 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 29–46 | 63.0%† | 1.8 | 7.4 |
| 2P | 28–45 | 62.2%† | 1.8 | 7.2 |
| 3P | 1–1 | 100.0%† | 0.0 | 0.2 |
| FT | 19–26 | 73.1% | 1.0 | 4.2 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 64.1%† | 67.9%† | 2.2%† | 56.5%† | 0.08 |
Accepted logged appearances only; absent games are not zeroes. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25); the field-goal floor applies to the derived rates above. Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
Norfolk St · Low and other · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $4K
- 80% range $1K to $18K
- Median share of team pool
- 2.2%
- team pool $240K, 80% range $87K to $640K
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $4K in all four
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $2K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 21.8%
- Sufficient evidence
- Range driven by assumption, not data
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. Tier prior from anonymous surveys and sources, scaled so that all non-Power budgets sum to the national total the College Sports Commission reported paid for 2025-26 ($1,770,453,776 over 307 schools) less the Power 4 total, times a men's basketball share; weak anchor.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
Norfolk St: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ
Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Norfolk St | $4Kspeculative | $1K to $18K | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | -1.9 | -2.8 to -0.9 | Sufficient evidence | -0.1 | -1.8 | +0.9range +0.8 to +1.1 | 843 | Season detail |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology
Game log
| Measure | Graphic | Last five | Listed games | Range |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minutes | 10:30 | 10:01 | 2:03–19:02 | |
| Points | 2.6 | 3.1 | 0.0–9.0 | |
| Game eFG% | 61.7% | 66.0% | 0.0%–100.0% |
| Date | Opponent | Result | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF | FG | 3P | FT | eFG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-12 | South Carolina St. | L 82–88 | 3:05 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | — |
| 2026-03-05 | Howard | L 76–84 | 9:46 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 50.0% |
| 2026-03-02 | Morgan St. | L 84–90 | 4:54 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0.0% |
| 2026-02-28 | Coppin St. | W 75–69 | 15:41 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 100.0% |
| 2026-02-21 | South Carolina St. | W 90–71 | 19:02 | 9 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3-6 | 1-1 | 2-2 | 58.3% |
| 2026-02-16 | UMES | W 70–66 | 14:59 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 3-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 100.0% |
| 2026-02-14 | Delaware St. | W 75–58 | 3:48 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | — |
| 2026-02-07 | N.C. Central | W 75–68 | 13:50 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 4-4 | 50.0% |
| 2026-01-31 | Howard | L 60–88 | 3:16 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | — |
| 2026-01-26 | Morgan St. | L 78–79 | 11:17 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-2 | — |
| 2026-01-24 | Coppin St. | W 103–76 | 13:52 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 3-4 | 100.0% |
| 2026-01-17 | South Carolina St. | W 89–82 | 11:21 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 3-4 | 33.3% |
| 2026-01-12 | UMES | L 70–74 | 15:39 | 7 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 3-4 | 100.0% |
| 2025-12-28 | Louisiana | L 54–63 | 2:03 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | — |
| 2025-12-22 | UC Irvine | L 70–89 | 10:06 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 66.7% |
| 2025-12-21 | UTEP | W 72–71 | 3:39 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 100.0% |
| 2025-12-19 | Jackson St. | W 82–72 | 13:06 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 100.0% |
| 2025-12-18 | Grambling | L 68–80 | 4:27 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | — |
| 2025-12-06 | James Madison | L 67–68 | 6:40 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | — |
| 2025-11-29 | Arizona | L 61–98 | 12:19 | 8 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 4-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 80.0% |
| 2025-11-23 | Wyoming | L 67–75 | 10:47 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 2-2 | 50.0% |
| 2025-11-21 | Hampton | W 62–60 | 11:14 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 100.0% |
| 2025-11-14 | Towson | L 41–51 | 9:51 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 50.0% |
| 2025-11-11 | Old Dominion | L 57–60 | 12:34 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 50.0% |
| 2025-11-08 | William & Mary | L 78–81 | 13:01 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 2-4 | 0.0% |