Rob Brown III
Stony Brook · 2025–26 · 30 available game logs · Speculative compensation · Model-implied values by season · Linked seasons and observed career performance
Logged performance
947:18 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 30
- Minutes per game
- 31:35
- Points per game
- 10.6
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 3.1 / 1.3
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 10.6 | 3.1 | 1.3 | 0.5 | 0.2 | 1.0 | 1.9 |
| Per 40 minutes | 13.5 | 3.9 | 1.6 | 0.6 | 0.3 | 1.3 | 2.4 |
| Season totals | 319 | 92 | 39 | 14 | 7 | 31 | 57 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 104–275 | 37.8% | 9.2 | 11.6 |
| 2P | 42–96 | 43.8%† | 3.2 | 4.1 |
| 3P | 62–179 | 34.6% | 6.0 | 7.6 |
| FT | 49–57 | 86.0% | 1.9 | 2.4 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 49.1% | 53.2% | 65.1% | 20.7% | 1.26 |
Accepted logged appearances only; absent games are not zeroes. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
Stony Brook · Low and other · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $30K
- 80% range $3K to $99K
- Median share of team pool
- 12.5%
- team pool $310K, 80% range $120K to $815K
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $29K to $30K
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $2K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 78.3%
- Sufficient evidence
- Range driven by assumption, not data
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. Tier prior from anonymous surveys and sources, scaled so that all non-Power budgets sum to the national total the College Sports Commission reported paid for 2025-26 ($1,770,453,776 over 307 schools) less the Power 4 total, times a men's basketball share; weak anchor.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
Stony Brook: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ
Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Stony Brook | $30Kspeculative | $3K to $99K | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | -0.3 | -1.2 to +0.8 | Sufficient evidence | +0.1 | -0.4 | +4.8range +4.2 to +5.3 | 2,952 | Season detail | |
| 2025 | Nicholls St | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | +1.1 | -0.0 to +2.2 | Sufficient evidence | +0.4 | +0.8 | +4.0range +3.3 to +4.7 | 2,371 | Season detail | |
| 2022 | Niagara | None: no budget that season | — | development: in model selection | -1.5 | -2.5 to -0.2 | Sufficient evidence | -1.0 | -0.5 | Not computed for this season | 1,326 |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology
Game log
| Measure | Graphic | Last five | Listed games | Range |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minutes | 31:14 | 31:35 | 14:06–41:42 | |
| Points | 13.0 | 10.6 | 3.0–24.0 | |
| Game eFG% | 53.9% | 48.1% | 15.0%–91.7% |
| Date | Opponent | Result | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF | FG | 3P | FT | eFG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-07 | Campbell | L 89–96 | 35:25 | 22 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 8-15 | 3-9 | 3-4 | 63.3% |
| 2026-03-03 | Towson | L 57–69 | 34:18 | 15 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5-11 | 3-9 | 2-2 | 59.1% |
| 2026-02-28 | Hofstra | L 58–67 | 23:58 | 5 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 1-6 | 1-4 | 2-2 | 25.0% |
| 2026-02-26 | Monmouth | L 69–82 | 31:25 | 14 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 5-9 | 4-8 | 0-0 | 77.8% |
| 2026-02-21 | Hampton | W 79–72 | 31:04 | 9 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 3-9 | 2-7 | 1-2 | 44.4% |
| 2026-02-16 | Drexel | W 72–69 | 34:29 | 8 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2-5 | 2-4 | 2-2 | 60.0% |
| 2026-02-12 | Towson | L 57–69 | 29:18 | 10 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 4-7 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 71.4% |
| 2026-02-07 | Northeastern | W 69–55 | 31:38 | 8 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1-6 | 0-4 | 6-6 | 16.7% |
| 2026-02-05 | Monmouth | L 75–76 | 33:19 | 5 | 6 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1-10 | 1-8 | 2-2 | 15.0% |
| 2026-01-31 | Elon | W 72–68 | 34:30 | 17 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 6-15 | 5-12 | 0-0 | 56.7% |
| 2026-01-29 | Campbell | W 81–69 | 24:13 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 1-3 | 0-1 | 2-2 | 33.3% |
| 2026-01-22 | Northeastern | W 95–80 | 34:10 | 5 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 2-5 | 1-4 | 0-0 | 50.0% |
| 2026-01-17 | Col. of Charleston | W 112–106 | 41:42 | 17 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 6-9 | 3-6 | 2-2 | 83.3% |
| 2026-01-15 | Hofstra | W 76–71 | 34:45 | 9 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3-7 | 2-4 | 1-2 | 57.1% |
| 2026-01-10 | UNCW | L 71–75 | 35:43 | 24 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 8-12 | 6-9 | 2-3 | 91.7% |
| 2026-01-08 | Drexel | L 37–56 | 34:15 | 9 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 3-11 | 3-10 | 0-0 | 40.9% |
| 2026-01-03 | N.C. A&T | W 81–80 | 33:46 | 11 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 4-8 | 3-6 | 0-1 | 68.8% |
| 2025-12-31 | William & Mary | L 57–76 | 31:08 | 15 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 5-12 | 5-10 | 0-1 | 62.5% |
| 2025-12-29 | Hampton | L 59–62 | 14:06 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1-5 | 1-4 | 0-0 | 30.0% |
| 2025-12-21 | Marist | L 51–70 | 19:34 | 7 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3-12 | 1-5 | 0-0 | 29.2% |
| 2025-12-17 | UAlbany | L 55–71 | 28:58 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2-7 | 0-3 | 2-3 | 28.6% |
| 2025-12-13 | Central Mich. | W 78–55 | 30:37 | 12 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 5-7 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 85.7% |
| 2025-12-09 | Columbia | W 77–73 | 41:24 | 12 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 5-13 | 0-4 | 2-2 | 38.5% |
| 2025-12-06 | Duquesne | L 75–84 | 37:34 | 12 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 4-11 | 2-5 | 2-2 | 45.5% |
| 2025-11-28 | LMU (CA) | W 71–68 | 33:55 | 7 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1-8 | 1-6 | 4-4 | 18.8% |
| 2025-11-25 | Bethune-Cookman | W 61–54 | 22:43 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1-7 | 1-5 | 1-1 | 21.4% |
| 2025-11-24 | Pacific | L 58–86 | 28:17 | 8 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3-7 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 57.1% |
| 2025-11-20 | Brown | W 80–70 | 36:45 | 12 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2-8 | 2-5 | 6-6 | 37.5% |
| 2025-11-15 | Yale | L 79–86 | 28:58 | 13 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 4-13 | 2-8 | 3-3 | 38.5% |
| 2025-11-08 | Maine | W 71–60 | 35:21 | 16 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 5-17 | 2-7 | 4-5 | 35.3% |