Patton Pinkins
Ole Miss · 2025–26 · 34 available game logs · Speculative compensation · Model-implied values by season · Linked seasons and observed career performance
Logged performance
855:41 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 34
- Minutes per game
- 25:10
- Points per game
- 9.3
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 1.9 / 0.9
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 9.3 | 1.9 | 0.9 | 0.5 | 0.1 | 0.3 | 1.4 |
| Per 40 minutes | 14.8 | 3.1 | 1.4 | 0.8 | 0.1 | 0.5 | 2.2 |
| Season totals | 316 | 66 | 30 | 17 | 3 | 10 | 48 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 104–225 | 46.2% | 6.6 | 10.5 |
| 2P | 62–125 | 49.6% | 3.7 | 5.8 |
| 3P | 42–100 | 42.0% | 2.9 | 4.7 |
| FT | 66–77 | 85.7% | 2.3 | 3.6 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 55.6% | 61.0% | 44.4% | 34.2% | 3.00 |
Accepted logged appearances only; absent games are not zeroes. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
Mississippi · Power 4 · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $445K
- 80% range $215K to $705K
- Median share of team pool
- 12.7%
- team pool $3.60M, 80% range $2.55M to $4.95M
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $445K in all four
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $23K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 62.2%
- Sufficient evidence
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. House-settlement $20.5M cap (College Sports Commission, 2026-10-01) times a modelled utilisation of about 97 percent times a men's basketball share of about 18 percent (school statements and an industry study); Power 4 schools are at or near the cap nationally.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
Mississippi: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ
Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Mississippi | $445Kspeculative | $215K to $705K | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | +1.8 | +0.5 to +3.2 | Sufficient evidence | +1.3 | +0.5 | +4.2range +3.7 to +4.7 | 2,690 | Season detail |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology
Game log
| Measure | Graphic | Last five | Listed games | Range |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minutes | 26:38 | 25:10 | 7:20–41:01 | |
| Points | 7.4 | 9.3 | 0.0–26.0 | |
| Game eFG% | 40.5% | 51.1% | 0.0%–100.0% |
| Date | Opponent | Result | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF | FG | 3P | FT | eFG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-14 | Arkansas | L 90–93 | 29:20 | 13 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 3-5 | 2-3 | 5-6 | 80.0% |
| 2026-03-13 | Alabama | W 80–79 | 30:18 | 13 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5-8 | 1-2 | 2-2 | 68.8% |
| 2026-03-12 | Georgia | W 76–72 | 21:14 | 4 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2-7 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 28.6% |
| 2026-03-11 | Texas | W 76–66 | 26:24 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0-4 | 0-1 | 3-4 | 0.0% |
| 2026-03-07 | South Carolina | L 61–64 | 25:52 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2-8 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 25.0% |
| 2026-03-03 | Vanderbilt | L 86–89 | 37:43 | 16 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 3-6 | 1-2 | 9-10 | 58.3% |
| 2026-02-28 | Auburn | W 85–79 | 38:14 | 26 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 8-10 | 4-5 | 6-7 | 100.0% |
| 2026-02-25 | LSU | L 99–106 | 34:06 | 8 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 2-7 | 0-4 | 4-4 | 28.6% |
| 2026-02-21 | Florida | L 75–94 | 36:01 | 10 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 3-8 | 0-3 | 4-4 | 37.5% |
| 2026-02-18 | Texas A&M | L 77–80 | 27:02 | 11 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4-5 | 2-3 | 1-2 | 100.0% |
| 2026-02-14 | Mississippi St. | L 78–90 | 20:41 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1-5 | 1-4 | 0-0 | 30.0% |
| 2026-02-11 | Alabama | L 74–93 | 24:18 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2-9 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 27.8% |
| 2026-02-07 | Texas | L 68–79 | 35:11 | 10 | 6 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4-9 | 1-3 | 1-1 | 50.0% |
| 2026-02-03 | Tennessee | L 66–84 | 35:21 | 15 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5-9 | 3-6 | 2-2 | 72.2% |
| 2026-01-31 | Vanderbilt | L 68–71 | 27:08 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3-6 | 1-2 | 2-2 | 58.3% |
| 2026-01-24 | Kentucky | L 63–72 | 29:55 | 9 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3-12 | 3-5 | 0-0 | 37.5% |
| 2026-01-20 | Auburn | L 66–78 | 29:40 | 15 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 6-9 | 1-3 | 2-2 | 72.2% |
| 2026-01-17 | Mississippi St. | W 68–67 | 27:57 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1-7 | 0-3 | 2-2 | 14.3% |
| 2026-01-14 | Georgia | W 97–95 | 41:01 | 18 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 7-9 | 3-3 | 1-2 | 94.4% |
| 2026-01-10 | Missouri | W 76–69 | 11:19 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-3 | 0-3 | 0-0 | 0.0% |
| 2026-01-07 | Arkansas | L 87–94 | 24:23 | 10 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 2-8 | 1-4 | 5-6 | 31.3% |
| 2026-01-03 | Oklahoma | L 70–86 | 29:54 | 25 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 9-11 | 4-6 | 3-3 | 100.0% |
| 2025-12-29 | Alcorn | W 79–43 | 26:55 | 13 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5-7 | 3-5 | 0-0 | 92.9% |
| 2025-12-21 | NC State | L 62–76 | 9:14 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-2 | 0-1 | 1-2 | 0.0% |
| 2025-12-17 | Alabama A&M | W 80–66 | 15:37 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1-4 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 37.5% |
| 2025-12-13 | Southern Miss. | W 71–67 | 21:29 | 12 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4-8 | 1-2 | 3-5 | 56.3% |
| 2025-12-06 | St. John's (NY) | L 58–63 | 9:27 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0-2 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0.0% |
| 2025-12-02 | Miami (FL) | L 66–75 | 27:23 | 11 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4-8 | 1-3 | 2-2 | 56.3% |
| 2025-11-27 | Utah | L 74–75 | 27:58 | 14 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5-9 | 2-4 | 2-2 | 66.7% |
| 2025-11-25 | Iowa | L 69–74 | 7:20 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2-3 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 83.3% |
| 2025-11-18 | Austin Peay | W 72–65 | 19:07 | 8 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3-5 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 80.0% |
| 2025-11-14 | CSU Bakersfield | W 82–60 | 15:05 | 8 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1-4 | 1-2 | 5-6 | 37.5% |
| 2025-11-11 | Memphis | W 83–77 | 16:52 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 1-1 | 50.0% |
| 2025-11-03 | Southeastern La. | W 88–58 | 16:12 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2-4 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 62.5% |