Ilias Kamardine
Ole Miss · 2025–26 · 34 available game logs · Speculative compensation · Model-implied values by season · Linked seasons and observed career performance
Logged performance
1061:13 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 34
- Minutes per game
- 31:13
- Points per game
- 11.1
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 3.5 / 3.7
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 11.1 | 3.5 | 3.7 | 1.3 | 0.4 | 1.9 | 2.4 |
| Per 40 minutes | 14.3 | 4.5 | 4.7 | 1.7 | 0.5 | 2.5 | 3.1 |
| Season totals | 379 | 119 | 125 | 44 | 12 | 66 | 81 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 143–345 | 41.4% | 10.1 | 13.0 |
| 2P | 105–210 | 50.0% | 6.2 | 7.9 |
| 3P | 38–135 | 28.1% | 4.0 | 5.1 |
| FT | 55–72 | 76.4% | 2.1 | 2.7 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 47.0% | 50.3% | 39.1% | 20.9% | 1.89 |
Accepted logged appearances only; absent games are not zeroes. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
Mississippi · Power 4 · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $270K
- 80% range $26K to $525K
- Median share of team pool
- 8.1%
- team pool $3.60M, 80% range $2.55M to $4.95M
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $270K in all four
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $23K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 77.2%
- Sufficient evidence
- Range driven by assumption, not data
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. House-settlement $20.5M cap (College Sports Commission, 2026-10-01) times a modelled utilisation of about 97 percent times a men's basketball share of about 18 percent (school statements and an industry study); Power 4 schools are at or near the cap nationally.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
Mississippi: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ
Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Mississippi | $270Kspeculative | $26K to $525K | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | -0.4 | -1.7 to +0.9 | Sufficient evidence | +0.3 | -0.6 | +4.3range +3.8 to +4.8 | 3,337 | Season detail |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology
Game log
| Measure | Graphic | Last five | Listed games | Range |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minutes | 31:49 | 31:13 | 14:51–47:44 | |
| Points | 11.4 | 11.1 | 0.0–26.0 | |
| Game eFG% | 45.8% | 45.9% | 0.0%–89.3% |
| Date | Opponent | Result | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF | FG | 3P | FT | eFG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-14 | Arkansas | L 90–93 | 28:57 | 13 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 5 | 5-12 | 1-6 | 2-3 | 45.8% |
| 2026-03-13 | Alabama | W 80–79 | 29:06 | 16 | 6 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 7-15 | 2-5 | 0-0 | 53.3% |
| 2026-03-12 | Georgia | W 76–72 | 36:21 | 8 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 5 | 1 | 3-10 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 40.0% |
| 2026-03-11 | Texas | W 76–66 | 36:45 | 16 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 8-16 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 50.0% |
| 2026-03-07 | South Carolina | L 61–64 | 27:57 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 2-5 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 40.0% |
| 2026-03-03 | Vanderbilt | L 86–89 | 38:39 | 14 | 7 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 3 | 5-14 | 3-7 | 1-2 | 46.4% |
| 2026-02-28 | Auburn | W 85–79 | 28:37 | 7 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 3-11 | 1-4 | 0-0 | 31.8% |
| 2026-02-25 | LSU | L 99–106 | 47:44 | 26 | 5 | 10 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 9-18 | 1-3 | 7-7 | 52.8% |
| 2026-02-21 | Florida | L 75–94 | 31:47 | 14 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 5-10 | 0-2 | 4-4 | 50.0% |
| 2026-02-18 | Texas A&M | L 77–80 | 40:00 | 12 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 5-10 | 1-5 | 1-1 | 55.0% |
| 2026-02-14 | Mississippi St. | L 78–90 | 29:03 | 5 | 3 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 1-3 | 1-2 | 2-2 | 50.0% |
| 2026-02-11 | Alabama | L 74–93 | 25:13 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2-8 | 1-5 | 0-0 | 31.3% |
| 2026-02-07 | Texas | L 68–79 | 25:58 | 11 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 4-12 | 2-5 | 1-2 | 41.7% |
| 2026-02-03 | Tennessee | L 66–84 | 28:04 | 11 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 4-8 | 3-6 | 0-0 | 68.8% |
| 2026-01-31 | Vanderbilt | L 68–71 | 30:20 | 14 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 5-10 | 0-3 | 4-4 | 50.0% |
| 2026-01-24 | Kentucky | L 63–72 | 33:40 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 1-11 | 0-4 | 1-2 | 9.1% |
| 2026-01-20 | Auburn | L 66–78 | 35:01 | 8 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3-11 | 2-8 | 0-0 | 36.4% |
| 2026-01-17 | Mississippi St. | W 68–67 | 31:55 | 17 | 4 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 8-19 | 0-4 | 1-1 | 42.1% |
| 2026-01-14 | Georgia | W 97–95 | 29:49 | 13 | 3 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5-9 | 1-3 | 2-3 | 61.1% |
| 2026-01-10 | Missouri | W 76–69 | 29:21 | 7 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 3-8 | 1-5 | 0-0 | 43.8% |
| 2026-01-07 | Arkansas | L 87–94 | 25:47 | 16 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 6-12 | 2-6 | 2-2 | 58.3% |
| 2026-01-03 | Oklahoma | L 70–86 | 34:23 | 9 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2-7 | 1-3 | 4-6 | 35.7% |
| 2025-12-29 | Alcorn | W 79–43 | 21:05 | 6 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 2-6 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 50.0% |
| 2025-12-21 | NC State | L 62–76 | 14:51 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0-2 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0.0% |
| 2025-12-17 | Alabama A&M | W 80–66 | 32:03 | 9 | 5 | 8 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 3-4 | 0-1 | 3-5 | 75.0% |
| 2025-12-13 | Southern Miss. | W 71–67 | 32:52 | 4 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1-7 | 0-2 | 2-3 | 14.3% |
| 2025-12-06 | St. John's (NY) | L 58–63 | 32:50 | 16 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 6-13 | 2-5 | 2-2 | 53.8% |
| 2025-12-02 | Miami (FL) | L 66–75 | 25:18 | 4 | 3 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 1-11 | 1-4 | 1-2 | 13.6% |
| 2025-11-27 | Utah | L 74–75 | 33:34 | 15 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 5-7 | 1-2 | 4-4 | 78.6% |
| 2025-11-25 | Iowa | L 69–74 | 38:27 | 12 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 3 | 5-12 | 0-4 | 2-2 | 41.7% |
| 2025-11-18 | Austin Peay | W 72–65 | 37:40 | 15 | 7 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 5-11 | 2-5 | 3-3 | 54.5% |
| 2025-11-14 | CSU Bakersfield | W 82–60 | 26:55 | 10 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 4-10 | 1-4 | 1-2 | 45.0% |
| 2025-11-11 | Memphis | W 83–77 | 34:47 | 26 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 11-14 | 3-4 | 1-5 | 89.3% |
| 2025-11-03 | Southeastern La. | W 88–58 | 26:24 | 13 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 4-9 | 1-4 | 4-5 | 50.0% |