Tai'Reon Joseph
Prairie View · 2025–26 · 25 available game logs · Speculative compensation · Model-implied values by season · Linked seasons and observed career performance
Logged performance
738:24 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 25
- Minutes per game
- 29:32
- Points per game
- 16.4
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 2.2 / 0.9
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 16.4 | 2.2 | 0.9 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 1.8 | 2.1 |
| Per 40 minutes | 22.2 | 3.0 | 1.2 | 1.4 | 0.0 | 2.4 | 2.8 |
| Season totals | 410 | 56 | 23 | 25 | 0 | 45 | 52 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 141–364 | 38.7% | 14.6 | 19.7 |
| 2P | 91–192 | 47.4% | 7.7 | 10.4 |
| 3P | 50–172 | 29.1% | 6.9 | 9.3 |
| FT | 78–103 | 75.7% | 4.1 | 5.6 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 45.6% | 50.1% | 47.3% | 28.3% | 0.51 |
Accepted logged appearances only; absent games are not zeroes. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
Prairie View · Low and other · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $3K
- 80% range $1K to $19K
- Median share of team pool
- 1.0%
- team pool $180K, 80% range $66K to $480K
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $3K in all four
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $1K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 58.4%
- Sufficient evidence
- Range driven by assumption, not data
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. Tier prior from anonymous surveys and sources, scaled so that all non-Power budgets sum to the national total the College Sports Commission reported paid for 2025-26 ($1,770,453,776 over 307 schools) less the Power 4 total, times a men's basketball share; weak anchor.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
Prairie View: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ
Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Prairie View | $3Kspeculative | $1K to $19K | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | -4.0 | -5.5 to -2.3 | Sufficient evidence | -0.8 | -3.2 | +2.1range +1.5 to +2.9 | 2,636 | Season detail | |
| 2025 | UT San Antonio | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | -2.1 | -2.8 to -1.3 | Sufficient evidence | -0.4 | -1.8 | +1.1range +0.9 to +1.4 | 1,246 | Season detail | |
| 2024 | Southern Univ | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | -0.9 | -2.0 to +0.4 | Sufficient evidence | +0.2 | -1.1 | +1.4range +1.0 to +1.8 | 1,743 | Season detail | |
| 2022 | Radford | None: no budget that season | — | development: in model selection | -1.8 | -2.7 to -0.7 | Sufficient evidence | -1.4 | -0.4 | Not computed for this season | 827 | ||
| 2021 | Austin Peay | None: no budget that season | — | development: in model selection | -1.0 | -2.0 to -0.1 | Sufficient evidence | -0.2 | -0.8 | Not computed for this season | 1,230 | 2020-21 season, shortened by COVID-19 cancellations; kept in the model fit with this flag. |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology
Game log
| Measure | Graphic | Last five | Listed games | Range |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minutes | 17:27 | 29:32 | 9:08–40:00 | |
| Points | 7.4 | 16.4 | 0.0–34.0 | |
| Game eFG% | 49.6% | 43.2% | 0.0%–73.7% |
| Date | Opponent | Result | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF | FG | 3P | FT | eFG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-20 | Florida | L 55–114 | 29:59 | 16 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 5-9 | 2-5 | 4-5 | 66.7% |
| 2026-03-18 | Lehigh | W 67–55 | 9:08 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2-4 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 62.5% |
| 2026-03-14 | Southern U. | W 72–66 | 9:36 | 10 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4-7 | 2-5 | 0-0 | 71.4% |
| 2026-03-13 | Alabama A&M | W 74–55 | 24:52 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2-6 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 33.3% |
| 2026-03-11 · NCAA | Bethune-Cookman | W 71–67 | 13:42 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1-7 | 0-3 | 0-0 | 14.3% |
| 2026-03-10 | Alcorn | W 65–56 | 13:34 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1-6 | 0-3 | 0-0 | 16.7% |
| 2026-02-14 | Southern U. | L 82–87 | 38:48 | 14 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 4-15 | 2-9 | 4-7 | 33.3% |
| 2026-02-09 | Florida A&M | L 96–100 | 29:30 | 32 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 10-18 | 6-11 | 6-8 | 72.2% |
| 2026-02-07 | Bethune-Cookman | L 76–82 | 40:00 | 8 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3-16 | 1-10 | 1-2 | 21.9% |
| 2026-01-31 | Texas Southern | W 85–78 | 39:56 | 31 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 11-23 | 5-12 | 4-4 | 58.7% |
| 2026-01-27 | Alabama A&M | L 60–80 | 37:54 | 15 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5-15 | 2-8 | 3-4 | 40.0% |
| 2026-01-24 | Alabama St. | L 80–95 | 29:12 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 2-9 | 0-2 | 2-3 | 22.2% |
| 2026-01-17 | Jackson St. | L 78–82 | 19:13 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0-6 | 0-5 | 0-0 | 0.0% |
| 2026-01-10 | Mississippi Val. | W 70–69 | 39:31 | 23 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 6-16 | 3-10 | 8-13 | 46.9% |
| 2026-01-05 | Southern U. | W 89–85 | 31:18 | 32 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 12-19 | 4-7 | 4-7 | 73.7% |
| 2026-01-03 | Grambling | L 72–76 | 21:49 | 21 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 6 | 1 | 8-22 | 3-11 | 2-2 | 43.2% |
| 2025-12-29 | Texas A&M | L 82–111 | 34:06 | 26 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 9-20 | 3-10 | 5-5 | 52.5% |
| 2025-12-22 | LSU | L 90–104 | 38:04 | 34 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 11-20 | 5-8 | 7-8 | 67.5% |
| 2025-12-13 | South Dakota | L 85–97 | 29:05 | 15 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 5 | 7-14 | 0-4 | 1-1 | 50.0% |
| 2025-11-30 | North Texas | L 69–72 | 39:20 | 19 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 8-18 | 1-5 | 2-2 | 47.2% |
| 2025-11-23 | North Florida | W 85–82 | 34:53 | 25 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 8-21 | 1-7 | 8-9 | 40.5% |
| 2025-11-22 | UT Martin | L 68–69 | 35:56 | 22 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 6-22 | 2-9 | 8-10 | 31.8% |
| 2025-11-17 | Missouri | L 73–91 | 35:31 | 17 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 7-19 | 3-9 | 0-0 | 44.7% |
| 2025-11-12 | Oklahoma St. | L 67–94 | 33:04 | 16 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 5-17 | 3-9 | 3-5 | 38.2% |
| 2025-11-08 | Wichita St. | L 62–105 | 30:23 | 15 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 4-15 | 1-7 | 6-8 | 30.0% |