Cory Wells
Prairie View · 2025–26 · 33 available game logs · Speculative compensation · Model-implied values by season · Linked seasons and observed career performance
Logged performance
1115:30 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 33
- Minutes per game
- 33:48
- Points per game
- 13.2
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 6.9 / 1.9
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 13.2 | 6.9 | 1.9 | 1.2 | 1.2 | 2.2 | 3.5 |
| Per 40 minutes | 15.6 | 8.1 | 2.3 | 1.4 | 1.5 | 2.6 | 4.1 |
| Season totals | 436 | 227 | 63 | 39 | 41 | 72 | 114 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 145–381 | 38.1% | 11.5 | 13.7 |
| 2P | 104–269 | 38.7% | 8.2 | 9.6 |
| 3P | 41–112 | 36.6% | 3.4 | 4.0 |
| FT | 105–141 | 74.5% | 4.3 | 5.1 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 43.4% | 49.2% | 29.4% | 37.0% | 0.88 |
Accepted logged appearances only; absent games are not zeroes. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
Prairie View · Low and other · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $28K
- 80% range $4K to $86K
- Median share of team pool
- 17.3%
- team pool $180K, 80% range $66K to $480K
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $26K to $29K
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $1K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 83.9%
- Sufficient evidence
- Range driven by assumption, not data
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. Tier prior from anonymous surveys and sources, scaled so that all non-Power budgets sum to the national total the College Sports Commission reported paid for 2025-26 ($1,770,453,776 over 307 schools) less the Power 4 total, times a men's basketball share; weak anchor.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
Prairie View: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ
Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Prairie View | $28Kspeculative | $4K to $86K | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | +0.0 | -0.9 to +1.0 | Sufficient evidence | -0.9 | +0.9 | +5.2range +4.5 to +5.8 | 3,790 | Season detail | |
| 2025 | Utah Valley | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | -0.6 | -1.7 to +0.7 | Sufficient evidence | -1.2 | +0.6 | +1.1range +0.8 to +1.4 | 908 | Season detail |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology
Game log
| Measure | Graphic | Last five | Listed games | Range |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minutes | 37:46 | 33:48 | 15:39–44:53 | |
| Points | 16.6 | 13.2 | 4.0–25.0 | |
| Game eFG% | 48.0% | 42.5% | 20.0%–83.3% |
| Date | Opponent | Result | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF | FG | 3P | FT | eFG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-20 | Florida | L 55–114 | 31:04 | 9 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3-14 | 2-9 | 1-2 | 28.6% |
| 2026-03-18 | Lehigh | W 67–55 | 39:35 | 19 | 11 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 6-14 | 1-4 | 6-6 | 46.4% |
| 2026-03-14 | Southern U. | W 72–66 | 39:33 | 16 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 6-15 | 2-4 | 2-2 | 46.7% |
| 2026-03-13 | Alabama A&M | W 74–55 | 38:38 | 17 | 7 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 6-13 | 2-6 | 3-6 | 53.8% |
| 2026-03-11 · NCAA | Bethune-Cookman | W 71–67 | 40:00 | 22 | 10 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 7-14 | 4-5 | 4-6 | 64.3% |
| 2026-03-10 | Alcorn | W 65–56 | 31:45 | 7 | 8 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 2-6 | 1-1 | 2-2 | 41.7% |
| 2026-03-05 | Texas Southern | W 70–59 | 36:44 | 20 | 7 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 7-13 | 4-7 | 2-3 | 69.2% |
| 2026-02-28 | Alcorn | W 72–51 | 37:09 | 5 | 9 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 2-10 | 0-4 | 1-2 | 20.0% |
| 2026-02-26 | Jackson St. | W 85–76 | 44:53 | 23 | 9 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 8-20 | 7-13 | 0-0 | 57.5% |
| 2026-02-21 | Ark.-Pine Bluff | L 82–84 | 32:26 | 8 | 7 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 4-8 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 50.0% |
| 2026-02-19 | Mississippi Val. | W 72–62 | 39:40 | 8 | 9 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 3-11 | 0-4 | 2-4 | 27.3% |
| 2026-02-16 | Grambling | W 68–63 | 38:39 | 10 | 8 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 4-15 | 0-2 | 2-4 | 26.7% |
| 2026-02-14 | Southern U. | L 82–87 | 27:30 | 9 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 5 | 2-9 | 1-2 | 4-6 | 27.8% |
| 2026-02-09 | Florida A&M | L 96–100 | 36:10 | 8 | 6 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 3-6 | 0-1 | 2-2 | 50.0% |
| 2026-02-07 | Bethune-Cookman | L 76–82 | 36:36 | 10 | 10 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 3-13 | 0-3 | 4-4 | 23.1% |
| 2026-01-31 | Texas Southern | W 85–78 | 25:00 | 7 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 2-7 | 0-3 | 3-6 | 28.6% |
| 2026-01-27 | Alabama A&M | L 60–80 | 15:39 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2-7 | 0-1 | 1-2 | 28.6% |
| 2026-01-24 | Alabama St. | L 80–95 | 22:04 | 9 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 3-7 | 1-3 | 2-2 | 50.0% |
| 2026-01-19 | Alcorn | L 75–76 | 37:16 | 19 | 8 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 4 | 6-13 | 3-4 | 4-6 | 57.7% |
| 2026-01-17 | Jackson St. | L 78–82 | 35:35 | 23 | 11 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 5 | 7-15 | 2-4 | 7-9 | 53.3% |
| 2026-01-12 | Ark.-Pine Bluff | W 73–61 | 39:54 | 21 | 10 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 7-17 | 2-4 | 5-6 | 47.1% |
| 2026-01-10 | Mississippi Val. | W 70–69 | 35:31 | 14 | 8 | 5 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 4 | 5-15 | 1-2 | 3-6 | 36.7% |
| 2026-01-05 | Southern U. | W 89–85 | 36:44 | 17 | 6 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 7-16 | 1-2 | 2-3 | 46.9% |
| 2026-01-03 | Grambling | L 72–76 | 32:44 | 13 | 10 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 5 | 3-11 | 0-0 | 7-8 | 27.3% |
| 2025-12-29 | Texas A&M | L 82–111 | 38:02 | 25 | 9 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 4 | 9-12 | 2-4 | 5-6 | 83.3% |
| 2025-12-22 | LSU | L 90–104 | 20:42 | 7 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 3-6 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 58.3% |
| 2025-12-13 | South Dakota | L 85–97 | 26:36 | 4 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 2-7 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 28.6% |
| 2025-11-30 | North Texas | L 69–72 | 39:59 | 13 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 3-12 | 1-3 | 6-7 | 29.2% |
| 2025-11-23 | North Florida | W 85–82 | 25:50 | 11 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 3-9 | 2-4 | 3-4 | 44.4% |
| 2025-11-22 | UT Martin | L 68–69 | 34:28 | 22 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 5-13 | 1-4 | 11-14 | 42.3% |
| 2025-11-17 | Missouri | L 73–91 | 37:13 | 16 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 6-14 | 0-3 | 4-5 | 42.9% |
| 2025-11-12 | Oklahoma St. | L 67–94 | 23:44 | 4 | 6 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 2-6 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 33.3% |
| 2025-11-08 | Wichita St. | L 62–105 | 38:07 | 15 | 9 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4-13 | 0-2 | 7-8 | 30.8% |