Jerquarius Stanback
Alabama St. · 2025–26 · 31 available game logs · Speculative compensation · Model-implied values by season · Linked seasons and observed career performance
Logged performance
767:00 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 31
- Minutes per game
- 24:45
- Points per game
- 8.7
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 5.9 / 0.6
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 8.7 | 5.9 | 0.6 | 1.0 | 2.0 | 1.5 | 2.8 |
| Per 40 minutes | 14.0 | 9.5 | 1.0 | 1.7 | 3.3 | 2.5 | 4.6 |
| Season totals | 269 | 182 | 19 | 32 | 63 | 48 | 88 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 103–201 | 51.2% | 6.5 | 10.5 |
| 2P | 100–181 | 55.2% | 5.8 | 9.4 |
| 3P | 3–20 | 15.0%† | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| FT | 60–88 | 68.2% | 2.8 | 4.6 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 52.0% | 56.1% | 10.0% | 43.8% | 0.40 |
Accepted logged appearances only; absent games are not zeroes. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
Alabama St · Low and other · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $39K
- 80% range $10K to $140K
- Median share of team pool
- 18.0%
- team pool $190K, 80% range $70K to $505K
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $33K to $41K
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $1K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 64.3%
- Sufficient evidence
- Range driven by assumption, not data
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. Tier prior from anonymous surveys and sources, scaled so that all non-Power budgets sum to the national total the College Sports Commission reported paid for 2025-26 ($1,770,453,776 over 307 schools) less the Power 4 total, times a men's basketball share; weak anchor.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
Alabama St: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ
Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Alabama St | $39Kspeculative | $10K to $140K | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | +0.9 | -0.5 to +2.3 | Sufficient evidence | -0.2 | +1.2 | +3.8range +3.2 to +4.3 | 2,739 | Season detail |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology
Game log
| Measure | Graphic | Last five | Listed games | Range |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minutes | 27:22 | 24:45 | 6:48–32:00 | |
| Points | 10.6 | 8.7 | 0.0–20.0 | |
| Game eFG% | 45.5% | 54.4% | 0.0%–100.0% |
| Date | Opponent | Result | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF | FG | 3P | FT | eFG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-09 | Alcorn | L 65–77 | 28:42 | 16 | 12 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 4 | 8-14 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 57.1% |
| 2026-03-05 | Grambling | L 63–65 | 25:50 | 11 | 9 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 3-5 | 0-0 | 5-7 | 60.0% |
| 2026-03-03 | Southern U. | L 64–71 | 28:34 | 9 | 8 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 3-7 | 0-0 | 3-4 | 42.9% |
| 2026-02-28 | Alabama A&M | W 89–88 | 30:24 | 8 | 7 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 3-10 | 0-0 | 2-2 | 30.0% |
| 2026-02-21 | Florida A&M | L 63–76 | 23:22 | 9 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 3-8 | 0-1 | 3-5 | 37.5% |
| 2026-02-19 | Bethune-Cookman | L 71–82 | 20:28 | 13 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 6-7 | 0-0 | 1-2 | 85.7% |
| 2026-02-16 | Mississippi Val. | W 92–55 | 25:47 | 13 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 3 | 5-9 | 1-1 | 2-2 | 61.1% |
| 2026-02-14 | Ark.-Pine Bluff | W 79–61 | 25:45 | 19 | 6 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 7-13 | 1-2 | 4-6 | 57.7% |
| 2026-02-09 | Southern U. | L 68–69 | 26:30 | 7 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 2-5 | 0-0 | 3-4 | 40.0% |
| 2026-02-07 | Grambling | L 47–57 | 24:28 | 2 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 1-7 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 14.3% |
| 2026-02-02 | Florida A&M | W 79–66 | 24:15 | 8 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 4-7 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 57.1% |
| 2026-01-31 | Bethune-Cookman | L 54–69 | 15:05 | 4 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 100.0% |
| 2026-01-27 | Texas Southern | L 64–96 | 21:01 | 13 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 4-8 | 0-2 | 5-7 | 50.0% |
| 2026-01-24 | Prairie View | W 95–80 | 22:07 | 13 | 8 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 4-6 | 0-0 | 5-6 | 66.7% |
| 2026-01-19 | Alabama A&M | L 69–73 | 32:00 | 20 | 7 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 8-9 | 1-1 | 3-4 | 94.4% |
| 2026-01-12 | Alcorn | W 81–66 | 18:11 | 7 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 3-4 | 100.0% |
| 2026-01-10 | Jackson St. | L 64–75 | 26:37 | 9 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 4-5 | 0-1 | 1-3 | 80.0% |
| 2026-01-05 | Ark.-Pine Bluff | L 79–90 | 24:21 | 6 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 0 | 3 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 2-5 | 50.0% |
| 2026-01-03 | Mississippi Val. | W 89–69 | 31:04 | 6 | 7 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 3-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 100.0% |
| 2025-12-29 | Mississippi St. | L 56–94 | 28:14 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1-8 | 0-2 | 1-1 | 12.5% |
| 2025-12-22 | Memphis | L 67–88 | 17:52 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 1-7 | 0-1 | 2-4 | 14.3% |
| 2025-12-17 | Cincinnati | L 51–88 | 25:45 | 6 | 7 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 2-6 | 0-1 | 2-3 | 33.3% |
| 2025-12-11 | Missouri | L 77–85 | 25:43 | 5 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2-4 | 0-1 | 1-2 | 50.0% |
| 2025-12-07 | UT Martin | L 64–74 | 28:20 | 12 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 4-7 | 0-2 | 4-7 | 57.1% |
| 2025-11-26 | New Mexico | L 87–93 | 29:36 | 13 | 9 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 5-7 | 0-1 | 3-4 | 71.4% |
| 2025-11-23 | SIUE | L 68–83 | 27:10 | 3 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 1-2 | 33.3% |
| 2025-11-21 | IU Indy | W 101–80 | 30:12 | 10 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 4-10 | 0-1 | 2-2 | 40.0% |
| 2025-11-19 | Air Force | L 64–66 | 25:23 | 8 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 3-3 | 0-0 | 2-2 | 100.0% |
| 2025-11-17 | Colorado | L 66–94 | 21:06 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 2-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 33.3% |
| 2025-11-11 | UAB | W 77–74 | 26:20 | 8 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 4-7 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 57.1% |
| 2025-11-07 · NCAA | Florida St. | L 64–101 | 6:48 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 0-2 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0.0% |