Torrin Andrews
Coppin St. · 2025–26 · 30 available game logs · Speculative compensation · Model-implied values by season · Linked seasons and observed career performance
Logged performance
558:52 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 30
- Minutes per game
- 18:38
- Points per game
- 4.8
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 1.4 / 1.4
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 4.8 | 1.4 | 1.4 | 0.4 | 0.1 | 1.9 | 1.1 |
| Per 40 minutes | 10.3 | 2.9 | 3.1 | 0.9 | 0.2 | 4.0 | 2.3 |
| Season totals | 144 | 41 | 43 | 13 | 3 | 56 | 32 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 45–121 | 37.2% | 4.0 | 8.7 |
| 2P | 23–47 | 48.9%† | 1.6 | 3.4 |
| 3P | 22–74 | 29.7% | 2.5 | 5.3 |
| FT | 32–41 | 78.0% | 1.4 | 2.9 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 46.3% | 51.8% | 61.2% | 33.9% | 0.77 |
Accepted logged appearances only; absent games are not zeroes. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
Coppin St · Low and other · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $3K
- 80% range $0 to $17K
- Median share of team pool
- 1.8%
- team pool $120K, 80% range $45K to $315K
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $2K to $3K
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $1K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 48.0%
- Sufficient evidence
- Range driven by assumption, not data
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. Tier prior from anonymous surveys and sources, scaled so that all non-Power budgets sum to the national total the College Sports Commission reported paid for 2025-26 ($1,770,453,776 over 307 schools) less the Power 4 total, times a men's basketball share; weak anchor.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
Coppin St: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ
Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Coppin St | $3Kspeculative | $0 to $17K | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | -3.4 | -4.6 to -2.3 | Sufficient evidence | -1.9 | -1.5 | +1.0range +0.8 to +1.2 | 1,800 | Season detail |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology
Game log
| Measure | Graphic | Last five | Listed games | Range |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minutes | 22:32 | 18:38 | 1:22–30:31 | |
| Points | 6.2 | 4.8 | 0.0–14.0 | |
| Game eFG% | 36.6% | 40.0% | 0.0%–125.0% |
| Date | Opponent | Result | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF | FG | 3P | FT | eFG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-05 | Morgan St. | L 66–70 | 28:21 | 14 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 5-12 | 3-8 | 1-2 | 54.2% |
| 2026-03-02 | Howard | L 70–90 | 8:59 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0.0% |
| 2026-02-28 | Norfolk St. | L 69–75 | 28:59 | 8 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3-5 | 1-3 | 1-2 | 70.0% |
| 2026-02-21 | UMES | W 71–65 | 25:17 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1-7 | 1-6 | 3-4 | 21.4% |
| 2026-02-16 | South Carolina St. | W 59–57 | 21:03 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 1-4 | 1-2 | 0-1 | 37.5% |
| 2026-02-14 | N.C. Central | W 58–56 | 22:31 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1-6 | 0-5 | 0-0 | 16.7% |
| 2026-02-07 | Delaware St. | W 65–47 | 1:22 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | — |
| 2026-02-02 | Howard | L 53–72 | 4:44 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0.0% |
| 2026-01-31 | Morgan St. | L 80–89 | 9:18 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | — |
| 2026-01-24 | Norfolk St. | L 76–103 | 20:54 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0-2 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0.0% |
| 2026-01-17 | UMES | L 67–70 | 26:11 | 13 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 3-5 | 2-4 | 5-5 | 80.0% |
| 2026-01-12 | South Carolina St. | L 72–74 | 28:52 | 12 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 3-6 | 2-4 | 4-4 | 66.7% |
| 2026-01-10 | N.C. Central | L 77–88 | 22:49 | 13 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4-4 | 2-2 | 3-4 | 125.0% |
| 2026-01-03 | Delaware St. | W 53–51 | 27:26 | 0 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0-5 | 0-2 | 0-1 | 0.0% |
| 2025-12-29 | UMBC | L 59–93 | 17:02 | 7 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2-5 | 1-3 | 2-2 | 50.0% |
| 2025-12-22 | Georgetown | L 67–97 | 25:04 | 6 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 3-7 | 0-3 | 0-0 | 42.9% |
| 2025-12-19 | Navy | L 55–88 | 30:31 | 11 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 5-8 | 1-4 | 0-0 | 68.8% |
| 2025-12-14 | Radford | L 77–107 | 27:47 | 9 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 5 | 4 | 3-7 | 3-5 | 0-0 | 64.3% |
| 2025-12-09 | Saint Joseph's | L 65–87 | 18:13 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 1-3 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 50.0% |
| 2025-12-06 | Liberty | L 50–92 | 8:39 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | — |
| 2025-12-03 | West Virginia | L 49–91 | 13:08 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 2-2 | 0.0% |
| 2025-11-30 | Loyola Maryland | L 84–95 | 20:45 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0-3 | 0-2 | 4-6 | 0.0% |
| 2025-11-25 | Rider | W 68–65 | 7:55 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | — |
| 2025-11-22 | VCU | L 58–101 | 20:35 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 1-6 | 0-3 | 0-0 | 16.7% |
| 2025-11-15 | South Alabama | L 62–72 | 13:45 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 1-4 | 1-4 | 0-0 | 37.5% |
| 2025-11-14 | Central Mich. | L 59–82 | 1:31 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0-3 | 0-3 | 0-0 | 0.0% |
| 2025-11-12 | South Fla. | L 50–100 | 19:41 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 1-2 | 1-2 | 1-2 | 75.0% |
| 2025-11-09 | James Madison | L 70–84 | 12:29 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 2-2 | — |
| 2025-11-05 | La Salle | L 59–87 | 25:37 | 11 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 3-6 | 1-4 | 4-4 | 58.3% |
| 2025-11-03 · NCAA | Maryland | L 61–83 | 19:24 | 9 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 4-7 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 64.3% |