Texas A&M

2026 · descriptive season · nil-value-v3 · Team results

Roster valuesβ

Roster values for Texas A&M, 2026: retrospective net points per 100 possessions and, for 2025–26 only, a speculative compensation best guess. Players are listed by possession share, not by value or dollars.
Player	Possession share	Net and range	Wins above replacement and range	Speculative compensation (best guess)	Compensation 80% range
Rashaun Agee	65.4%	+4.3range +3.1 to +5.8Sufficient evidence	+5.7range +5.2 to +6.4Sufficient evidence	$665KspeculativeLoading	$435K to $1.15MLoading
Rylan Griffen	60.1%	+1.6range -0.2 to +3.5Sufficient evidence	+4.3range +3.6 to +5.1Sufficient evidence	$335KspeculativeLoading	$99K to $570KLoading
Ruben Dominguez	57.7%	+4.1range +2.3 to +5.8Sufficient evidence	+5.0range +4.3 to +5.6Sufficient evidence	$550KspeculativeLoading	$330K to $990KLoading
Marcus Hill	56.0%	+1.9range +0.4 to +3.3Sufficient evidence	+4.1range +3.5 to +4.7Sufficient evidence	$325KspeculativeLoading	$130K to $525KLoading
Pop Isaacs	52.4%	+0.2range -1.3 to +1.6Sufficient evidence	+3.3range +2.7 to +3.8Sufficient evidence	$185KspeculativeLoading	$29K to $355KLoading
Jacari Lane	46.5%	+3.0range +1.8 to +4.2Sufficient evidence	+3.8range +3.3 to +4.1Sufficient evidence	$360KspeculativeLoading	$225K to $555KLoading
Zach Clemence	40.3%	+0.7range -0.8 to +2.1Sufficient evidence	+2.7range +2.2 to +3.1Sufficient evidence	$175KspeculativeLoading	$36K to $315KLoading
Ali Dibba	37.6%	+2.6range +0.9 to +4.1Sufficient evidence	+2.9range +2.5 to +3.3Sufficient evidence	$250KspeculativeLoading	$125K to $425KLoading
Josh Holloway	32.7%	+2.0range +0.6 to +3.1Sufficient evidence	+2.4range +2.1 to +2.7Sufficient evidence	$200KspeculativeLoading	$91K to $315KLoading
Federiko Federiko	19.7%	+2.5range +1.1 to +4.0Sufficient evidence	+1.5range +1.3 to +1.8Sufficient evidence	$145KspeculativeLoading	$77K to $245KLoading
Jamie Vinson	14.3%	+2.5range +1.2 to +3.5Sufficient evidence	+1.1range +1.0 to +1.2Sufficient evidence	$110KspeculativeLoading	$62K to $175KLoading
Mackenzie Mgbako	10.3%	+0.9range +0.3 to +1.5Limited evidence	+0.7range +0.6 to +0.8Limited evidence	$62KspeculativeLoading	$30K to $99KLoading
Chris McDermott	3.1%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence	Not applicable	$23Kspeculative, floor onlyLoading	$13K to $37KLoading
Jeremiah Green	2.5%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence	Not applicable	$23Kspeculative, floor onlyLoading	$13K to $37KLoading
Noah Shelby	1.5%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence	Not applicable	$23Kspeculative, floor onlyLoading	$13K to $37KLoading

Ranges are the 10th to 90th percentile of whole-game resampling draws. They are not calibrated intervals. Compensation is a speculative best guess of a share of the school's own revenue-sharing budget, not observed pay.

Team pool and per-player compensation · 2025–26β

Team Pool: $3.55M; 80% Range $2.55M to $4.95M
Tier: Power 4; medium evidence
Team Pool, Scenarios Z1 to Z4: $3.55M in all four; Scenario medians
Players with Figures: 15; 3 floor only

Players in possession-share order
Player	Poss. Share	Speculative Best Guess	80% Range	Median % of Team Pool	Scenarios Z1 to Z4	Floor Part	Evidence and Flags
Rashaun Agee	65.4%	$665K	$435K to $1.15M	18.2%	$665K in all four	$23K	Sufficient evidence
Rylan Griffen	60.1%	$335K	$99K to $570K	10.0%	$335K in all four	$23K	Sufficient evidence
Ruben Dominguez	57.7%	$550K	$330K to $990K	15.2%	$550K in all four	$23K	Sufficient evidence
Marcus Hill	56.0%	$325K	$130K to $525K	9.6%	$325K in all four	$23K	Sufficient evidence
Pop Isaacs	52.4%	$185K	$29K to $355K	5.6%	$185K in all four	$23K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Jacari Lane	46.5%	$360K	$225K to $555K	10.0%	$360K in all four	$23K	Sufficient evidence
Zach Clemence	40.3%	$175K	$36K to $315K	5.2%	$175K in all four	$23K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Ali Dibba	37.6%	$250K	$125K to $425K	7.3%	$250K in all four	$23K	Sufficient evidence
Josh Holloway	32.7%	$200K	$91K to $315K	5.9%	$200K in all four	$23K	Sufficient evidence
Federiko Federiko	19.7%	$145K	$77K to $245K	4.2%	$145K in all four	$23K	Sufficient evidence
Jamie Vinson	14.3%	$110K	$62K to $175K	3.2%	$110K in all four	$23K	Sufficient evidence
Mackenzie Mgbako	10.3%	$62K	$30K to $99K	1.9%	$62K in all four	$23K	Limited evidence
Chris McDermott	3.1%	$23K	$13K to $37K	0.7%	$23K in all four	$23K	Floor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimate
Jeremiah Green	2.5%	$23K	$13K to $37K	0.7%	$23K in all four	$23K	Floor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimate
Noah Shelby	1.5%	$23K	$13K to $37K	0.7%	$23K in all four	$23K	Floor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimate
Team Pool	—	$3.55M	$2.55M to $4.95M	100%	$3.55M in all four	—

What-if calculator on the team page

School Finances · School-Reported (EADA)

Self-reported to the U.S. Department of Education. Expenses cover coaching, travel, aid and operations, not player pay.

School-reported finances, 2024-25, Texas A&M University-College Station (NCAA Division I-FBS)
Measure	School-Reported Amount	Note
Men's basketball revenue	$15,734,652
Men's basketball expenses	$14,312,941
Athletics department expenses	$228,301,283
Athletics department revenue	$235,498,020

Coverage and exclusions

34 of 34 games passed lineup acceptance (100%). 100% of accepted on-court possessions are bound to registered players.

No exclusions were recorded.

Program revenueβ

EADA year 2024-25 (alternate pairing to repo season 2026; fiscal-year mapping unconfirmed) · self-reported by the school, no external review · EADA revenue is any money used to pay expenses

Reported revenue	$15,734,652	Reported by the school; not NIL pay and not a model output.
Reported expenses	$14,312,941	Reported by the school.

EADA link: matched to the registry school by a unique institution name and state.

No model-implied dollar range is shown (status: suppressed). The published dollar status could not be loaded; see NIL methodology for the reason.

Schedule loadβ

Counts are descriptive and associational, with neutral formatting. Consecutive away games is the only travel proxy; distance, time zones and injuries are not modeled.

Rest days before each game

Rest days	Games
First game (no rest value)	1
2 days	1
3 or more days	32

Rest is capped at three days. Descriptive count.

Load summary

Mean games in prior 7 days	1.5
Games with fewer rest days than the opponent	0
Longest run of consecutive away games	2

Association between rest and margin, all teams

Pooled association passes the declared test (gate S1); not causal and not specific to this team · 0.86 points of margin associated with each extra rest day, range +0.33 to +1.41

This is an association, not a causal lever, pooled across Division I and not specific to this team.

Manifest 13921361a27d · NIL methodology