Loyola MD

2026 · descriptive season · nil-value-v3 · Team results

Roster valuesβ

Roster values for Loyola MD, 2026: retrospective net points per 100 possessions and, for 2025–26 only, a speculative compensation best guess. Players are listed by possession share, not by value or dollars.
Player	Possession share	Net and range	Wins above replacement and range	Speculative compensation (best guess)	Compensation 80% range
Braeden Speed	81.9%	-0.0range -1.1 to +1.1Sufficient evidence	+4.6range +4.1 to +5.2Sufficient evidence	$0 (assumed opted out)Loading	80% range $0 to $0 (assumption, not data)Loading
Jordan Stiemke	68.5%	-1.6range -2.8 to -0.5Sufficient evidence	+3.4range +2.8 to +3.9Sufficient evidence	$0 (assumed opted out)Loading	80% range $0 to $0 (assumption, not data)Loading
Tyson Commander	58.1%	-1.7range -2.7 to -0.8Sufficient evidence	+2.8range +2.4 to +3.2Sufficient evidence	$0 (assumed opted out)Loading	80% range $0 to $0 (assumption, not data)Loading
Emmett Adair	54.0%	-0.0range -1.5 to +1.4Sufficient evidence	+3.2range +2.7 to +3.7Sufficient evidence	$0 (assumed opted out)Loading	80% range $0 to $0 (assumption, not data)Loading
Jacob Theodosiou	48.5%	-1.2range -2.3 to +0.0Sufficient evidence	+2.5range +2.1 to +2.9Sufficient evidence	$0 (assumed opted out)Loading	80% range $0 to $0 (assumption, not data)Loading
Sam Springer	42.3%	-3.2range -4.8 to -1.5Sufficient evidence	+1.7range +1.2 to +2.2Sufficient evidence	$0 (assumed opted out)Loading	80% range $0 to $0 (assumption, not data)Loading
Sebastien Emenalo	35.9%	-0.9range -2.7 to +0.4Sufficient evidence	+2.0range +1.5 to +2.3Sufficient evidence	$0 (assumed opted out)Loading	80% range $0 to $0 (assumption, not data)Loading
Troy Cicero Jr.	33.3%	+2.6range +1.4 to +3.9Sufficient evidence	+2.5range +2.3 to +2.9Sufficient evidence	$0 (assumed opted out)Loading	80% range $0 to $0 (assumption, not data)Loading
Carter Berg-McLean	30.6%	-0.2range -1.6 to +0.9Sufficient evidence	+1.8range +1.5 to +2.0Sufficient evidence	$0 (assumed opted out)Loading	80% range $0 to $0 (assumption, not data)Loading
Jonas Sirtautas	27.7%	+0.0range -0.8 to +1.0Sufficient evidence	+1.7range +1.5 to +1.9Sufficient evidence	$0 (assumed opted out)Loading	80% range $0 to $0 (assumption, not data)Loading
Everett Barnes	15.1%	-1.4range -2.4 to -0.6Sufficient evidence	+0.8range +0.7 to +0.9Sufficient evidence	$0 (assumed opted out)Loading	80% range $0 to $0 (assumption, not data)Loading
Garrett Brennan	2.7%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence	Not applicable	$0 (assumed opted out)Loading	80% range $0 to $0 (assumption, not data)Loading
Peter Sposito	0.7%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence	Not applicable	$0 (assumed opted out)Loading	80% range $0 to $0 (assumption, not data)Loading
Ben Menker	0.6%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence	Not applicable	$0 (assumed opted out)Loading	80% range $0 to $0 (assumption, not data)Loading

Ranges are the 10th to 90th percentile of whole-game resampling draws. They are not calibrated intervals. Compensation is a speculative best guess of a share of the school's own revenue-sharing budget, not observed pay.

Team pool and per-player compensation · 2025–26β

Team Pool: $0 (assumed opted out); 80% Range $0 to $0 (assumed)
Tier: Low and other; low evidence

Assumed from one unverified press article that names schools that did not opt in. Methodology

No player figures. The Team Pool is $0.

What-if calculator on the team page

School Finances · School-Reported (EADA)

Self-reported to the U.S. Department of Education. Expenses cover coaching, travel, aid and operations, not player pay.

School-reported finances, 2024-25, Loyola University Maryland (NCAA Division I without football)
Measure	School-Reported Amount	Note
Men's basketball revenue	$2,130,645	Equals expenses (budget identity)
Men's basketball expenses	$2,130,645
Athletics department expenses	$23,484,724
Athletics department revenue	$23,484,724

Coverage and exclusions

30 of 30 games passed lineup acceptance (100%). 100% of accepted on-court possessions are bound to registered players.

No exclusions were recorded.

Program revenueβ

EADA year 2024-25 (alternate pairing to repo season 2026; fiscal-year mapping unconfirmed) · self-reported by the school, no external review · EADA revenue is any money used to pay expensesrevenue equals expenses

Reported revenue	$2,130,645	Reported by the school; not NIL pay and not a model output.
Reported expenses	$2,130,645	Reported by the school.

EADA link: matched to the registry school by a unique institution name and state.

No model-implied dollar range is shown (status: suppressed). The published dollar status could not be loaded; see NIL methodology for the reason.

Schedule loadβ

Counts are descriptive and associational, with neutral formatting. Consecutive away games is the only travel proxy; distance, time zones and injuries are not modeled.

Rest days before each game

Rest days	Games
First game (no rest value)	1
1 day	1
2 days	2
3 or more days	26

Rest is capped at three days. Descriptive count.

Load summary

Mean games in prior 7 days	1.4
Games with fewer rest days than the opponent	2
Longest run of consecutive away games	3

Association between rest and margin, all teams

Pooled association passes the declared test (gate S1); not causal and not specific to this team · 0.86 points of margin associated with each extra rest day, range +0.33 to +1.41

This is an association, not a causal lever, pooled across Division I and not specific to this team.

Manifest 13921361a27d · NIL methodology