Illinois St
2026 · descriptive season · nil-value-v3 · Team results
Roster valuesβ
| Player | Possession share | Net and range | Wins above replacement and range | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Johnny Kinziger | 80.8% | +1.5range +0.5 to +2.7Sufficient evidence | +7.1range +6.3 to +7.9Sufficient evidence | Loading | Loading |
| Boden Skunberg | 66.2% | +0.2range -1.0 to +1.4Sufficient evidence | +5.1range +4.3 to +5.8Sufficient evidence | Loading | Loading |
| Landon Wolf | 58.6% | +1.4range +0.1 to +2.6Sufficient evidence | +5.1range +4.4 to +5.8Sufficient evidence | Loading | Loading |
| Ty Pence | 58.1% | +2.7range +1.6 to +3.8Sufficient evidence | +5.7range +5.0 to +6.3Sufficient evidence | Loading | Loading |
| Ty'Reek Coleman | 55.4% | +3.4range +1.9 to +4.9Sufficient evidence | +5.7range +5.0 to +6.5Sufficient evidence | Loading | Loading |
| Chase Walker | 51.8% | +6.2range +4.9 to +7.4Sufficient evidence | +6.5range +5.9 to +7.1Sufficient evidence | Loading | Loading |
| Mason Klabo | 38.0% | +1.9range +0.7 to +3.1Sufficient evidence | +3.4range +3.0 to +3.8Sufficient evidence | Loading | Loading |
| Landon Moore | 33.9% | -0.2range -1.6 to +1.1Sufficient evidence | +2.5range +2.0 to +2.8Sufficient evidence | Loading | Loading |
| Brandon Lieb | 31.5% | -0.8range -1.8 to +0.4Sufficient evidence | +2.2range +1.8 to +2.5Sufficient evidence | Loading | Loading |
| Jack Daugherty | 20.3% | +0.2range -1.2 to +1.6Sufficient evidence | +1.5range +1.3 to +1.8Sufficient evidence | Loading | Loading |
| Cameron Barnes | 4.4% | Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence | Not applicable | Loading | Loading |
| Ty Blake | 1.0% | Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence | Not applicable | Loading | Loading |
Ranges are the 10th to 90th percentile of whole-game resampling draws. They are not calibrated intervals. Compensation is a speculative best guess of a share of the school's own revenue-sharing budget, not observed pay.
Team pool and per-player compensation · 2025–26β
School Finances · School-Reported (EADA)
Self-reported to the U.S. Department of Education. Expenses cover coaching, travel, aid and operations, not player pay.
Coverage and exclusions
34 of 35 games passed lineup acceptance (97%). 100% of accepted on-court possessions are bound to registered players.
- 1 of 35 audited games did not pass lineup acceptance; per-game reasons are counted for the whole season (see methodology), not per team
Program revenueβ
EADA year 2024-25 (alternate pairing to repo season 2026; fiscal-year mapping unconfirmed) · self-reported by the school, no external review · EADA revenue is any money used to pay expensesrevenue equals expenses
| Reported revenue | $3,167,173 | Reported by the school; not NIL pay and not a model output. |
|---|---|---|
| Reported expenses | $3,167,173 | Reported by the school. |
EADA link: matched to the registry school by a unique institution name and state.
No model-implied dollar range is shown (status: suppressed). The published dollar status could not be loaded; see NIL methodology for the reason.
Schedule loadβ
Counts are descriptive and associational, with neutral formatting. Consecutive away games is the only travel proxy; distance, time zones and injuries are not modeled.
Rest days before each game
| Rest days | Games |
|---|---|
| First game (no rest value) | 1 |
| 1 day | 1 |
| 2 days | 1 |
| 3 or more days | 32 |
Rest is capped at three days. Descriptive count.
Load summary
| Mean games in prior 7 days | 1.3 |
|---|---|
| Games with fewer rest days than the opponent | 1 |
| Longest run of consecutive away games | 2 |
Association between rest and margin, all teams
Pooled association passes the declared test (gate S1); not causal and not specific to this team · 0.86 points of margin associated with each extra rest day, range +0.33 to +1.41
This is an association, not a causal lever, pooled across Division I and not specific to this team.
Manifest 13921361a27d · NIL methodology