High Point

2026 · descriptive season · nil-value-v3 · Team results

Roster valuesβ

Roster values for High Point, 2026: retrospective net points per 100 possessions and, for 2025–26 only, a speculative compensation best guess. Players are listed by possession share, not by value or dollars.
Player	Possession share	Net and range	Wins above replacement and range	Speculative compensation (best guess)	Compensation 80% range
Owen Aquino	70.5%	+2.5range +1.4 to +3.6Sufficient evidence	+4.5range +3.9 to +5.1Sufficient evidence	$33KspeculativeLoading	$11K to $91KLoading
Rob Martin	69.6%	+3.7range +2.3 to +5.0Sufficient evidence	+5.0range +4.3 to +5.7Sufficient evidence	$45KspeculativeLoading	$16K to $125KLoading
Terry Anderson	69.5%	+4.4range +2.8 to +5.8Sufficient evidence	+5.3range +4.4 to +6.0Sufficient evidence	$52KspeculativeLoading	$18K to $145KLoading
Conrad Martinez	52.7%	+2.9range +1.0 to +4.4Sufficient evidence	+3.3range +2.7 to +3.9Sufficient evidence	$28KspeculativeLoading	$9K to $78KLoading
Braden Hausen	51.2%	+3.5range +2.0 to +4.8Sufficient evidence	+3.4range +2.9 to +3.9Sufficient evidence	$31KspeculativeLoading	$11K to $83KLoading
Scotty Washington	47.5%	+3.2range +2.2 to +4.0Sufficient evidence	+3.0range +2.7 to +3.3Sufficient evidence	$27KspeculativeLoading	$10K to $71KLoading
Cam'Ron Fletcher	38.1%	+1.5range +0.3 to +2.5Sufficient evidence	+2.0range +1.7 to +2.2Sufficient evidence	$14KspeculativeLoading	$4K to $41KLoading
Chase Johnston	30.9%	+2.5range +1.4 to +3.4Sufficient evidence	+1.8range +1.6 to +2.0Sufficient evidence	$15KspeculativeLoading	$5K to $42KLoading
Vincent Brady II	29.1%	+1.0range -0.7 to +2.6Sufficient evidence	+1.4range +1.2 to +1.7Sufficient evidence	$10KspeculativeLoading	$2K to $29KLoading
Youssouf Singare	15.7%	+2.0range +1.0 to +3.1Sufficient evidence	+0.8range +0.7 to +0.9Sufficient evidence	$8KspeculativeLoading	$3K to $22KLoading
Caden Miller	10.2%	+1.8range +0.9 to +2.8Limited evidence	+0.5range +0.5 to +0.6Limited evidence	$5KspeculativeLoading	$2K to $15KLoading
Babacar Diallo	7.4%	+0.8range +0.1 to +1.5Limited evidence	+0.3range +0.3 to +0.4Limited evidence	$4KspeculativeLoading	$1K to $10KLoading
Josh Ibukunoluwa	5.3%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence	Not applicable	$2Kspeculative, floor onlyLoading	$1K to $5KLoading
David Fonville	1.5%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence	Not applicable	$2Kspeculative, floor onlyLoading	$1K to $5KLoading
Birgir Irving	0.8%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence	Not applicable	$2Kspeculative, floor onlyLoading	$1K to $5KLoading

Ranges are the 10th to 90th percentile of whole-game resampling draws. They are not calibrated intervals. Compensation is a speculative best guess of a share of the school's own revenue-sharing budget, not observed pay.

Team pool and per-player compensation · 2025–26β

Team Pool: $290K; 80% Range $110K to $750K
Tier: Low and other; low evidence
Team Pool, Scenarios Z1 to Z4: $270K to $330K; Scenario medians
Players with Figures: 15; 3 floor only

The widest scenario range, $125K to $845K, is wider than the 80% Range above (soft check S5). Methodology

Players in possession-share order
Player	Poss. Share	Speculative Best Guess	80% Range	Median % of Team Pool	Scenarios Z1 to Z4	Floor Part	Evidence and Flags
Owen Aquino	70.5%	$33K	$11K to $91K	12.5%	$31K to $38K	$2K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Rob Martin	69.6%	$45K	$16K to $125K	15.2%	$42K to $51K	$2K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Terry Anderson	69.5%	$52K	$18K to $145K	16.9%	$48K to $59K	$2K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Conrad Martinez	52.7%	$28K	$9K to $78K	10.2%	$26K to $31K	$2K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Braden Hausen	51.2%	$31K	$11K to $83K	10.7%	$29K to $36K	$2K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Scotty Washington	47.5%	$27K	$10K to $71K	9.5%	$25K to $31K	$2K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Cam'Ron Fletcher	38.1%	$14K	$4K to $41K	5.5%	$13K to $16K	$2K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Chase Johnston	30.9%	$15K	$5K to $42K	5.7%	$14K to $17K	$2K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Vincent Brady II	29.1%	$10K	$2K to $29K	4.0%	$9K to $11K	$2K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Youssouf Singare	15.7%	$8K	$3K to $22K	3.0%	$7K to $9K	$2K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Caden Miller	10.2%	$5K	$2K to $15K	2.1%	$5K to $6K	$2K	Limited evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Babacar Diallo	7.4%	$4K	$1K to $10K	1.4%	$3K to $4K	$2K	Limited evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Josh Ibukunoluwa	5.3%	$2K	$1K to $5K	0.7%	$2K in all four	$2K	Floor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimateRange driven by assumption, not data
David Fonville	1.5%	$2K	$1K to $5K	0.7%	$2K in all four	$2K	Floor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimateRange driven by assumption, not data
Birgir Irving	0.8%	$2K	$1K to $5K	0.7%	$2K in all four	$2K	Floor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimateRange driven by assumption, not data
Team Pool	—	$290K	$110K to $750K	100%	$270K to $330K	—

What-if calculator on the team page

School Finances · School-Reported (EADA)

Self-reported to the U.S. Department of Education. Expenses cover coaching, travel, aid and operations, not player pay.

School-reported finances, 2024-25, High Point University (NCAA Division I without football)
Measure	School-Reported Amount	Note
Men's basketball revenue	$5,483,080
Men's basketball expenses	$4,676,086
Athletics department expenses	$31,987,656
Athletics department revenue	$37,514,611

Coverage and exclusions

31 of 33 games passed lineup acceptance (94%). 100% of accepted on-court possessions are bound to registered players.

2 of 33 audited games did not pass lineup acceptance; per-game reasons are counted for the whole season (see methodology), not per team

Program revenueβ

EADA year 2024-25 (alternate pairing to repo season 2026; fiscal-year mapping unconfirmed) · self-reported by the school, no external review · EADA revenue is any money used to pay expenses

Reported revenue	$5,483,080	Reported by the school; not NIL pay and not a model output.
Reported expenses	$4,676,086	Reported by the school.

EADA link: matched to the registry school by a unique institution name and state.

No model-implied dollar range is shown (status: suppressed). The published dollar status could not be loaded; see NIL methodology for the reason.

Schedule loadβ

Counts are descriptive and associational, with neutral formatting. Consecutive away games is the only travel proxy; distance, time zones and injuries are not modeled.

Rest days before each game

Rest days	Games
First game (no rest value)	1
1 day	2
2 days	6
3 or more days	24

Rest is capped at three days. Descriptive count.

Load summary

Mean games in prior 7 days	1.3
Games with fewer rest days than the opponent	1
Longest run of consecutive away games	2

Association between rest and margin, all teams

Pooled association passes the declared test (gate S1); not causal and not specific to this team · 0.86 points of margin associated with each extra rest day, range +0.33 to +1.41

This is an association, not a causal lever, pooled across Division I and not specific to this team.

Manifest 13921361a27d · NIL methodology