Algosys College Basketball

Search teams and players

Type a team or player name. Results are alphabetical; players show their 2026 team. Up and Down move, Enter opens the highlighted result or the first one, Esc closes.

Carter Gilmore

Wisconsin · 35 available appearances · 2025–2025 · Linked seasons and observed career performance

Available player-season logs · Partial career coverage

Logged performance

680:05 minutes logged

Games logged
35
Minutes per game
19:26
Points per game
3.9
Rebounds / assists per game
2.6 / 1.3
Box line on three bases
BasisPtsRebAstStlBlkTOPF
Per game3.92.61.30.30.50.52.2
Per 40 minutes8.15.42.80.60.91.04.6
Season totals138914710161778
Shooting with attempts
ShotMade–att.PctAtt/GAtt/40
FG49–10546.7%3.06.2
2P29–4761.7%†1.32.8
3P20–5834.5%1.73.4
FT20–2774.1%0.81.6
Derived rates (computed here from the box line, not published statistics)
eFG%Estimated TS%3PA / FGAFTA / FGAAST / TO
56.2%59.0%55.2%25.7%2.76

Accepted logged appearances only; absent games are not zeroes. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions

Speculative compensationβ

No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons. The logs on this page are from seasons before 2025–26. A speculative best guess with an 80% range exists for 2025–26 only, for players on a modelled team; this player's by-season table below shows it for 2025–26 if one is published, and the linked athlete page has the full card.

Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ

Loading Model-implied values by season

Game log

Game log, box line per game. eFG% is computed for the game from field goals and three-pointers; it is blank without a field-goal attempt.
Season and dateOpponentResultMinPtsRebAstStlBlkTOPFFG3PFTeFG
2025 · 2025-03-22BYUL 89–9122:2634020031-30-11-233.3%
2025 · 2025-03-16MichiganL 53–5923:2533010031-31-30-050.0%
2025 · 2025-03-15Michigan StW 77–7430:43105513024-72-30-071.4%
2025 · 2025-03-14UCLAW 86–7022:0523300021-30-20-033.3%
2025 · 2025-03-13NorthwesternW 70–6319:2322210120-30-32-40.0%
2025 · 2025-03-08Penn StL 75–8626:2041100031-30-22-233.3%
2025 · 2025-03-05MinnesotaW 74–6723:2482201141-20-16-650.0%
2025 · 2025-03-02Michigan StL 62–7116:0141111122-40-10-150.0%
2025 · 2025-02-25WashingtonW 88–6215:3120200121-30-20-033.3%
2025 · 2025-02-22OregonL 73–7724:4245210102-40-10-050.0%
2025 · 2025-02-18IllinoisW 95–7420:2752011122-31-20-083.3%
2025 · 2025-02-15PurdueW 94–8423:5521102031-20-10-050.0%
2025 · 2025-02-08IowaW 74–6323:3234200051-51-30-030.0%
2025 · 2025-02-04IndianaW 76–6423:48103101003-43-31-2112.5%
2025 · 2025-02-01NorthwesternW 75–6923:27157100025-73-52-292.9%
2025 · 2025-01-29MarylandL 68–7617:2125000021-20-10-050.0%
2025 · 2025-01-26NebraskaW 83–5521:0134300011-40-01-125.0%
2025 · 2025-01-21UCLAL 83–8523:3151100142-31-20-083.3%
2025 · 2025-01-18USCW 84–6924:2323300111-20-10-050.0%
2025 · 2025-01-14Ohio StW 70–6828:1153101132-31-10-083.3%
2025 · 2025-01-10MinnesotaW 80–596:4900100020-10-10-00.0%
2025 · 2025-01-06RutgersW 75–6321:3532002231-31-20-050.0%
2025 · 2025-01-03IowaW 116–8522:5262100132-32-20-0100.0%
2025 · 2024-12-22DetroitW 76–5310:4701100020-20-20-00.0%
2025 · 2024-12-14ButlerW 83–7421:2873300032-31-22-283.3%
2025 · 2024-12-10IllinoisL 80–8619:2274000153-51-20-070.0%
2025 · 2024-12-07MarquetteL 74–8819:3356510212-51-10-050.0%
2025 · 2024-12-03MichiganL 64–6710:1134000031-31-30-050.0%
2025 · 2024-11-30Chicago StW 74–5311:5221100001-20-10-050.0%
2025 · 2024-11-24PittsburghW 81–751:5400000000-10-10-00.0%
2025 · 2024-11-22UCFW 86–7020:2520202030-20-22-20.0%
2025 · 2024-11-18UTRGVW 87–8420:1105010130-00-00-2—
2025 · 2024-11-15ArizonaW 103–888:0700001130-00-00-0—
2025 · 2024-11-07Montana StW 79–6723:4542201012-30-10-066.7%
2025 · 2024-11-04Holy CrossW 85–617:3852000002-20-01-1100.0%

Secondary NCAA-derived SportsDataverse archive; reconstructed player statistics. Corroborated against Kaggle dates, participants, scores and overtime; incomplete identity coverage is retained.