Thomas Bruce
Only corroborated player-season records; not complete career coverage.
Observed career performance
1836:41 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 64
- Minutes per game
- 28:42
- Points per game
- 8.3
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 6.5 / 1.0
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 8.3 | 6.5 | 1.0 | 0.6 | 1.7 | 1.6 | 2.5 |
| Per 40 minutes | 11.6 | 9.1 | 1.3 | 0.8 | 2.3 | 2.3 | 3.5 |
| Season totals | 532 | 418 | 61 | 36 | 106 | 104 | 162 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 211–398 | 53.0% | 6.2 | 8.7 |
| 2P | 211–395 | 53.4% | 6.2 | 8.6 |
| 3P | 0–3 | 0.0%† | 0.0 | 0.1 |
| FT | 110–200 | 55.0% | 3.1 | 4.4 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 53.0% | 54.7% | 0.8% | 50.3% | 0.59 |
Combined corroborated seasons only; not complete career coverage. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Linked seasons
| Season | Team | G | MPG | Pts | Reb | Ast | Pts/40 | 3P% | FT% | TS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 Thomas Bruce | Binghamton | 21 | 27:00 | 6.3 | 4.7 | 0.7 | 9.4 | — | 52.9% | 56.6%† |
| 2017 Thomas Bruce | Binghamton | 18 | 28:07 | 7.3 | 5.4 | 0.7 | 10.4 | 0.0%† | 61.4% | 48.1% |
| 2018 Thomas Bruce | Binghamton | 20 | 32:12 | 11.3 | 9.6 | 1.4 | 14.0 | — | 52.6% | 57.9% |
| 2021 Thomas Bruce | Binghamton | 5Few games | 23:55 | 8.6 | 6.0 | 0.8 | 14.4 | 0.0%† | 50.0%† | 56.3%† |
Career identity corroborated by repeated game, team and individual-statistic matches. Unlinked seasons are excluded.
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
No speculative compensation is published for this player: there is no current-season team to read a pool from.
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | Binghamton | None: no budget that season | — | development: in model selection | +2.0 | +1.1 to +3.0 | Limited evidence | +0.0 | +2.0 | Not computed for this season | 401 | Limited evidence: 300 to 599 on-court possessions. 2020-21 season, shortened by COVID-19 cancellations; kept in the model fit with this flag. | |
| 2018 | Binghamton | None: no budget that season | — | training: in model fit | +0.8 | -0.3 to +1.8 | Sufficient evidence | -0.6 | +1.5 | Not computed for this season | 2,081 | ||
| 2017 | Not applicable | None: no budget that season | — | training: in model fit | A point value exists for this season but no range is published, so none is shown. | Not applicable | |||||||
| 2016 | Not applicable | None: no budget that season | — | training: in model fit | A point value exists for this season but no range is published, so none is shown. | Not applicable | |||||||
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown; this identity has such a value in 2016, 2017. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology