Algosys College Basketball

Search teams and players

Type a team or player name. Results are alphabetical; players show their 2026 team. Up and Down move, Enter opens the highlighted result or the first one, Esc closes.

Marcus Stout

Only corroborated player-season records; not complete career coverage.

Observed career performance

3620:00 minutes logged

Games logged
112
Minutes per game
32:19
Points per game
14.3
Rebounds / assists per game
3.0 / 2.8
Box line on three bases
BasisPtsRebAstStlBlkTOPF
Per game14.33.02.81.20.12.62.4
Per 40 minutes17.73.73.41.50.13.23.0
Season totals16013363091398294267
Shooting with attempts
ShotMade–att.PctAtt/GAtt/40
FG546–135040.4%12.114.9
2P302–68044.4%6.17.5
3P244–67036.4%6.07.4
FT265–36073.6%3.24.0
Derived rates (computed here from the box line, not published statistics)
eFG%Estimated TS%3PA / FGAFTA / FGAAST / TO
49.5%53.1%49.6%26.7%1.05

Combined corroborated seasons only; not complete career coverage. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions

Linked seasons

Linked seasons, per-game and shooting rates. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the declared floor.
SeasonTeamGMPGPtsRebAstPts/403P%FT%TS%
2005 Marcus StoutFordham 2531:1714.03.22.718.035.8%79.0%53.2%
2006 Marcus StoutFordham 3230:5813.03.02.816.837.8%77.0%52.1%
2007 Marcus StoutFordham 2933:1415.43.32.618.638.1%66.7%55.5%
2008 Marcus StoutFordham 2633:5814.82.42.917.434.4%73.2%51.3%

Career identity corroborated by repeated game, team and individual-statistic matches. Unlinked seasons are excluded.

Speculative compensation · 2025–26β

No speculative compensation is published for this player: there is no current-season team to read a pool from.

No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.

Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ

No model-implied value is published for this player: fewer than 300 on-court possessions in every season, or the team’s games were outside the lineup audit.

Seasons played, with no model-implied value published
SeasonTeamSpeculative compensation (best guess)Compensation 80% rangeSplit roleValue
2008Not applicabletraining: in model fitNo model-implied value is published.
2007Not applicabletraining: in model fitNo model-implied value is published.
2006Not applicabletraining: in model fitNo model-implied value is published.
2005Not applicabletraining: in model fitNo model-implied value is published.

NIL methodology