Algosys College Basketball

Search teams and players

Type a team or player name. Results are alphabetical; players show their 2026 team. Up and Down move, Enter opens the highlighted result or the first one, Esc closes.

Zach Tow

Only corroborated player-season records; not complete career coverage.

Observed career performance

6:11 minutes logged Few gamesUnder 100 minutes

Games logged
9
Minutes per game
0:41
Points per game
0.4
Rebounds / assists per game
0.0 / 0.0
Box line on three bases
BasisPtsRebAstStlBlkTOPF
Per game0.40.00.00.00.00.00.1
Per 40 minutes25.90.00.00.00.00.06.5
Season totals4000001
Shooting with attempts
ShotMade–att.PctAtt/GAtt/40
FG1–1100.0%†0.16.5
2P0–0—0.00.0
3P1–1100.0%†0.16.5
FT1–250.0%†0.212.9
Derived rates (computed here from the box line, not published statistics)
eFG%Estimated TS%3PA / FGAFTA / FGAAST / TO
150.0%†106.4%†100.0%†200.0%†—

Combined corroborated seasons only; not complete career coverage. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25); the field-goal floor applies to the derived rates above. Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions

Linked seasons

Linked seasons, per-game and shooting rates. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the declared floor.
SeasonTeamGMPGPtsRebAstPts/403P%FT%TS%
2025 Zach TowKentucky 2Few games0:070.00.00.00.0———
2026 Zach TowKentucky 7Few games0:510.60.00.026.9100.0%†50.0%†106.4%†

Career identity corroborated by repeated game, team and individual-statistic matches. Unlinked seasons are excluded.

Speculative compensation · 2025–26β

Kentucky · Power 4 · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.

Speculative best guess
$25K
80% range $14K to $41K
Median share of team pool
0.7%
team pool $3.60M, 80% range $2.55M to $5.00M
Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
$25K in all four
the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
Floor part
$25K
shared by every player with possessions
Possession share
0.4%
Floor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimate
Point and 80% range on the team table's axis. Open circle: limited evidence or floor only.
  • Floor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimate

Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.

Budget anchor. House-settlement $20.5M cap (College Sports Commission, 2026-10-01) times a modelled utilisation of about 97 percent times a men's basketball share of about 18 percent (school statements and an industry study); Power 4 schools are at or near the cap nationally.

Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks

Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.

Kentucky: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player

No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.

Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ

No model-implied value is published for this player: fewer than 300 on-court possessions in every season, or the team’s games were outside the lineup audit.

Seasons played, with no model-implied value published
SeasonTeamSpeculative compensation (best guess)Compensation 80% rangeSplit roleValue
2026Not applicabledescriptive: not used in fit or gatesNo model-implied value is published.
2025Not applicableevaluation: examined, post hocNo model-implied value is published.

NIL methodology